In:Tense, Aspect, Modality, and Evidentiality: Crosslinguistic perspectives
Edited by Dalila Ayoun, Agnès Celle and Laure Lansari
[Studies in Language Companion Series 197] 2018
► pp. 83–108
Chapter 5Evidentiality and the TAM systems in English and Spanish
A cognitive and cross-linguistic perspective
Published online: 2 August 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.197.05mar
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.197.05mar
Abstract
This chapter examines and proposes plausible explanations for attested extensions of tense-aspect-modality (TAM) systems to inferential and reportative evidentiality based on the contrastive case study – British English (BrE) vs. Peninsular Spanish (PSp) – of some TAM markers realizing evidential functions: epistemic modals ‘must’, ‘must have’, and ‘deber (de)’, ‘deber (de) haber’; future perfect verbal forms ‘will have’, ‘habrá/n’; and conditional perfect verbal forms ‘would have’, ‘habría/n’. It is argued that the parameters playing a crucial role in facilitating these extensions include immediacy in relation to the ground and reality (cf. Langacker 2017) for inferential values, while irrealis (cf. Givon 1989) and frame-shifting to a counter point of view (Chilton 2014) are relevant for reportative evidentiality.
Keywords: evidentiality, inferential, reportative, modality, TAM systems
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Evidentiality and the TAM systems in English and Spanish
- 2.1Dimensions and parameters of evidentiality
- 2.2TAM systems in European languages: Epistemicity and inferentiality
- 2.3Temporality-aspectuality and epistemicity
- 2.4Temporality-aspectuality and reportativity
- 3.The case study: Hypotheses, research objectives and methodology
- 3.1Hypotheses and research objectives
- 3.2Case study: Corpora
- 3.3 Research design: Data collection and procedure
- 4.Results and discussion
- 4.1 Results: Epistemic modal > inferential evidentiality
- 4.2Results: Future perfect and conditional perfect > epistemic/inferential values
- 4.3Results: Conditional perfect > indirect reportative values
- 5.Conclusions
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (49)
Anderson, Lloyd B. 1986. Evidentials, paths of change, and mental maps: Typologically regular asymmetries. In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds), 273–312. Norwood NJ: Ablex.
Boye, Kasper. 2012. Epistemic Meaning: A Crosslinguistic and Functional-cognitive Study. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Boye, Kasper & Harder, Peter. 2009. Evidentiality. Linguistic categories and grammaticalization. Functions of Language 16(1): 9–43.
Brisard, Frank. 2013. An account of English tense and aspect in Cognitive Grammar. In Time. Language, Cognition and Reality, Kasia M. Jaszczolt & Louis de Saussure (eds), 210–235. Oxford: OUP.
Celle, Agnès. 2005. The French future tense and English will as markers of epistemic modality. Languages in Contrast 5(2): 181–218.
Celle, Agnès. 2008. Tense, modality and commitment in modes of mixed enunciation. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 22(1):15–36.
Chafe, Wallace. 1986. Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds), 261–272. Norwood NJ: Ablex.
Chilton, Paul. 2013. Frames of reference and the linguistic concepualization of time: Present and future. In Time. Language, Cognition and Reality, Kasia M. Jaszczolt & Louis de Saussure (eds), 236–258. Oxford: OUP.
Cornillie, Bert, Juana I. Marin-Arrese & Wiemer, Bjorn. 2015. Evidentiality and the semantics–pragmatics interface. An introduction. Belgium Journal of Linguistics 29: 1–18.
Cruschina, Silvio & Remberger, Eva-Maria. 2008. Hearsay and reported speech: Evidentiality in Romance. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 33: 95–116.
Dendale, Patrick. 1994. Devoir épistémique, marqueur modal ou évidentiel? Langue Française 102: 24–40.
. 2010.
Il serait à Paris en ce moment. Serait-il à Paris? A propos de deux emplois épistémiques du conditionnel. Grammaire, syntaxe, sémantique. In Liens linguistiques. Etudes sur la combinatoire et la hiérarchie des composants, Camino Alvarez Castro, Flor María Bango de la Campa & María Luisa Donaire Fernández (eds), 291–317. Bern: Peter Lang.
Diewald, Gabriele & Smirnova. 2010. Evidentiality in German. Linguistic Realization and Regularities in Grammaticalization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Givón, Talmy. 1982. Evidentiality and epistemic space. Studies in Language 6(1): 23–49.
2013. Temporality and epistemic commitment: An unresolved question. In Time. Language, Cognition and Reality, Kasia M. Jaszczolt & Louis de Saussure (eds), 193–209. Oxford: OUP.
Kronning, Hans. 2015. El condicional epistémico de atribución en francés, italiano y español: Aspectos diafásicos, diatópicos y diacrónicos. In Les variations diasystématiques et leurs interdépendances dans les langues romanes, Kirsten Jeppesen Kragh & Jan Lindschouw (eds), 507–521. Strasbourg: Société de linguistique romane/ÉLiPhi.
Laca, Brenda. 2005. Tiempo, aspecto y la interpretación de los verbos modales en español. Lingüística ALFAL 17: 9–44.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 2. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
2013. Modals: Striving for control. In English Modality: Core, Periphery and Evidentiality, Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Marta Carretero, Jorge Arús & Johan van der Auwera (eds), 3–55. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
2017. Evidentiality in Cognitive Grammar. In Evidentiality Revisited: Cognitive Grammar, Functional and Discourse-pragmatic Perspectives [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 271], Juana I. Marín Arrese, Gerda Hassler & Marta Carretero (eds), 13–55. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Marín Arrese, Juana I. 2013. Stancetaking and inter/subjectivity in the Iraq inquiry: Blair vs. Brown. English Modality: Core, Periphery and Evidentiality, Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Marta Carretero, Jorge Arús & Johan van der Auwera (eds), 411–445. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Marín-Arrese, Juana I. 2017a. Stancetaking and inter/subjectivity in journalistic discourse: the engagement system revisited. Evaluation in Media Discourse: European Perspectives, Ruth Breeze & Inés Olza (eds), 21–48. Bern: Peter Lang.
2017b. Multifunctionality of evidential expressions in discourse domains and genres: evidence from cross-linguistic case studies. Evidentiality Revisited: Cognitive Grammar, Functional and Discourse-pragmatic Perspectives [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 271], Juana I. Marín Arrese, Gerda Hassler & Marta Carretero (eds), 195–223. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Oliveira, Teresa. 2015. Between evidentiality and epistemic modality: The case of the future and the conditional in European Portuguese. Evidentiality and the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface, Bert Cornillie & Juana I. Marín-Arrese (eds). Special issue of Belgium Journal of Linguistics 29: 101–121.
Peirce, Charles S. 1955. Philosophical writings of Peirce, Justus Buchler (ed.). New York NY: Dover.
Plungian, Vladimir. 2001. The place of evidentiality within the universal grammatical space. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 349–357.
Sanders, José & Spooren, Wilbert. 1996. Subjectivity and certainty in epistemic modality: A study of Dutch epistemic modifiers. Cognitive Linguistics 7(3): 241–264.
de Saussure, Louis. 2013. Perspectival interpretations of tenses. In Time. Language, Cognition and Reality, Kasia M. Jaszczolt & Louis de Saussure (eds), 46–69. Oxford: OUP.
de Saussure, Louis & Morency, Patrick. 2012. A cognitive-pragmatic view of the French epistemic future. French Language Studies 22: 207–223.
Smirnova, Anastasia. 2013. Evidentiality in Bulgarian: Temporality, epistemic modality, and information source. Journal of Semantics 30: 479–532.
Squartini, Mario. 2001. The internal structure of evidentiality in Romance. Studies in Language 25(2): 297–334.
Sthioul, Bertrand. 1998. Temps verbaux et points de vue. In Le temps des événements, Jacques Moeschler, Jacques Jayez, Monika Kozlowska, Jean-Marc Luscher, Bertrand Sthioul & Louis de Saussure (eds), 197–220. Paris: Kimé.
Sweetser, Eve. 1982. Root and epistemic modals: Causality in two worlds. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 8: 484–507.
Tasmowski, Liliane. 2001. Questions au conditionnel. Le conditionnel en français, Patrick Dendale & Liliane Tasmowski (eds), 331–343. Recherches Linguistiques 25. Metz: Université de Metz.
Tournadre, Nicolas & LaPolla, Randy J. 2014. Towards a new approach to evidentiality. Issues and directions for research. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37(2): 240–263.
van der Auwera, Johan & Vladimir Plungian. 1998. Modalityʹs semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2(1): 79–124.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Veiga, Alexandre
Kratochvílová, Dana
Marín-Arrese, Juana I.
2021. Variation of evidential values in discourse domains. In Corpora in Translation and Contrastive Research in the Digital Age [Benjamins Translation Library, 158], ► pp. 233 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
