In:Tense, Aspect, Modality, and Evidentiality: Crosslinguistic perspectives
Edited by Dalila Ayoun, Agnès Celle and Laure Lansari
[Studies in Language Companion Series 197] 2018
► pp. 1–18
Chapter 1Introduction
On the gradience of TAM-E categories
Published online: 2 August 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.197.01ayo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.197.01ayo
Article outline
- 1.Categorization in tense, aspect, modality and evidentiality: Theoretical issues and state of the art
- 1.1Futurity, modality and conditionals
- 1.2Evidentiality and epistemicity
- 1.3Aspect
- 2.Presentation of the volume
- 2.1Part I: Futurity, modality, conditionals
- 2.2Part II: Evidentiality and epistemicity
- 2.3Part III: Aspect and past temporality
Notes References
References (66)
Abraham, Werner. 1998. The morphological and semantic classification of ‘evidentials’ and modal verbs in West Germanic: The perfect(ive) catalyst. Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik 42: 192–206.
Abraham, Werner & Kulikov, Leonid (eds). 1999. Tense-aspect, Transitivity and Causativity. Essays in honor of Vladimir Nedjalkov [Studies in Language Companion Series 50]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Abraham, Werner & Leiss, Elisabeth (eds). 2008. Modality-Aspect Interfaces: Implications and Typological Solutions [Typological Studies in Language 79]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2014. The grammar of knowledge: A cross-linguistic view of evidentials and the expression of information source. In The Grammar of Knowledge. A Cross-Linguistic Typology, Alexandra Aikhenvald & Robert M. W. Dixon (eds), 1–51. Oxford: OUP.
Anderson, Lloyd. 1986. Evidentials, paths of change, and mental maps: Typologically regular asymmetries. In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds), 273–312. Norwood NJ: Ablex.
Bertinetto, Pier Marco & Delfitto, Denis. 2000. Aspect vs. actionality: Why they should be kept apart. In Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, Östen Dahl (ed.), 189–225. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Boye, Kasper. 2012. Epistemic Meaning: A Crosslinguistic and Functional-cognitive Study. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Boye Kasper & Harder, Peter. 2009. Evidentiality: Linguistics categories and grammaticalization. Functions of Language 16: 9–43
Bres, Jacques. 2003. Temps verbal, aspect et point de vue: De la langue au discours. Cahiers de Praxématique 41: 55–84.
Bres, Jacques, Azzopardi, Sophie & Sarrazin, Sophie. 2012. Présentation générale: Ultériorité du passé et valeurs modales. Faits de Langues 40: 5–11.
Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Bybee, Joan & Dahl, Östen. 1989. The creation of tense and aspect systems in the languages of the world. Studies in Language 13(1): 51–103.
Bybee Joan. 1985. Morphology. A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form [Typological Studies in Language 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Chafe, Wallace & Nichols, Johanna (eds). 1986. Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood NJ: Ablex.
Celle, Agnès. 1997. Etude contrastive du futur français et de ses réalisations en anglais. Paris: Ophrys.
. 2009. Hearsay adverbs and modality. In Modality in English: Theory and Description, Raphael Salkie, Pierre Busuttil & Johan van der Auwera (eds), 269–293. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Celle, Agnès & Tsangalidis, Anastasios. 2017. Introduction. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, The Linguistic Expression of Mirativity 15(2): 305–311.
Dahl, Östen. 2000. The tense-aspect systems of European languages in a typological perspective. In Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, Östen Dahl (ed.), 3–25. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
de Haan, Ferdinand. 1999. Evidentiality and epistemic modality: Setting boundaries. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 18: 83–101.
. 2005. Semantic distinctions of evidentiality. In The World Atlas of Language Structures, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), 314–317. Oxford: OUP.
de Swart, Henriëtte. 2000. Tense, aspect and coercion in a cross-linguistic perspective. In Proceedings of the Berkeley Formal Grammar Conference, Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway (eds), 1–20. Stanford CA: CSLI.
Diewald, Gabriele & Smirnova, Elena. 2010. Linguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Du Bois, John. 2007. The stance triangle. In Stancetaking in Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 164], Robert Englebretson (ed.), 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Faller, Martina. 2002. Semantics and Pragmatics of Evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.
Fleischman, Suzanne. 1982. The Future in Thought and Language: Diachronic Evidence from Romance. Cambridge: CUP.
Gosselin, Laurent, Enjalbert, Patrice, Mathet, Yann & Becher, Gérard. 2013. Aspect de l’itération. L’expression de la répétition en français: Analyse linguistique et formalisation. Bern: Peter Lang.
Guentchéva, Zlatka. 2016. Introduction. In Aspectuality and Temporality: Descriptive and Theoretical Issues [Studies in Language Companion Series 172], Zlatka Guentchéva (ed.), 1–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.
Johanson, Lars. 2000. Viewpoint operators in European Languages. In Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, Östen Dahl (ed.), 27–187. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Klein, Wolfgang. 2009. How time is encoded. In The Expression of Time, Wolfgang Klein & Ping Li (eds), 39–82. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Korotkova, Natalia. 2016. Heterogeneity and Uniformity in the Evidential Domain. PhD dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles.
LaPolla, Randy J. Forthcoming. On categorization: Stick to the facts of the languages. Linguistic Typology.
Leiss, Elisabeth & Abraham, Werner (eds). 2014. Modes of Modality. Modality, Typology, and Universal Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series 149]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Manning, Liliann, Cassel, Daniel & Cassel, Jean-Christophe. 2013. St Augustine’s reflections on memory and time and the current concept of subjective time in mental time travel. Behavioral Sciences 3(2): 232–243.
2004. Type shifting in Construction Grammar: An integrated approach to aspectual coercion. Cognitive Linguistics 15: 1–67.
Michaelis, Laura. 2006. Tense in English. In The Handbook of English Linguistics, Bas Aarts & April McMahon (eds), 220–243. Oxford: Blackwell.
Mithun, Marianne. 1986. Semantics and Pragmatics of Evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. PhD dissertation, Stanford Universty.
Mortelmans, Tanya. 2000. On the ‘evidential’ nature of the ‘epistemic’ use of the German modals müssen and sollen
. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 14: 131–148.
Mushin, Ilana. 2001. Evidentiality and Epistemological Stance: Narrative Retelling [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 87]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Nuyts, Jan. 2017. Evidentiality reconsidered. In Evidentiality Revisited [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 271], Juana Isabel Marίn Arrese, Gerda Haβler & Marta Carretero (eds), 57–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sahoo, Kalyanamalini & Lemmens, Maarten. 2017. Degrees of mirativity. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, The Linguistic Expression of Mirativity 15(2): 343–384.
Ultan, Russell. 1978. The nature of future tenses. In
Universals of Human Language, IV: Word Structure
, Joseph Greenberg (ed.), 83–123. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
van der Auwera, Johan & Plungian, Vladimir. 1998. Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2: 79–124.
van Wassenhove, Virginie. 2017. Time consciousness in a computational mind/brain. Journal of Consciousness Studies 24(3–4): 177–202.
von Fintel, Kai & Gillies, Anthony S. 2010. Must … stay … strong! Natural Language Semantics 18(4): 351–383.
Willett, Thomas. 1988. A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality. Studies in Language 12(1): 51–97
