In:Essays on Linguistic Realism:
Edited by Christina Behme and Martin Neef
[Studies in Language Companion Series 196] 2018
► pp. 139–184
Chapter 6Languages and other abstract structures
Published online: 26 July 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.196.06nef
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.196.06nef
Abstract
My aim in this chapter is to extend the Realist account of the foundations of linguistics offered by Postal, Katz and others. I first argue against the idea that naive Platonism can capture the necessary requirements on what I call a ‘mixed realist’ view of linguistics, which takes aspects of Platonism, Nominalism and Mentalism into consideration. I then advocate three desiderata for an appropriate ‘mixed realist’ account of linguistic ontology and foundations, namely (1) linguistic creativity and infinity, (2) linguistics as a theory of types (and not tokens) and (3) independence but structural respect between language and the linguistic competence thereof. My own brand of mixed realism, what I call ante rem realism, is defended along the lines of an ante rem or non-eliminative structuralism, the likes of which has been offered for mathematics by Resnik (1997) and Shapiro (1997). In other words, grammars describe a mind-independent (but not necessarily unconnected) linguistic reality in terms of linguistic patterns or structures also known as natural languages. I further amend this picture to allow for the possibility of a naturalistic account of language acquisition and evolution by arguing against a particular view of the type-token distinction.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Three desiderata for Mixed Realism
- 2.1Linguistic creativity and infinity
- 2.1.1Creativity
- 2.1.2Rule-following and infinity
- 2.2Of tokens and types
- 2.3Mixed Realism and respect
- 2.4Taking stock
- 2.4.1Mixed Realism and Modified Realism
- 2.1Linguistic creativity and infinity
- 3.Against Platonism
- 3.1The right kind of ‘wrong view’
- 3.2Benacerraf’s dilemma and respect
- 3.3Conceptual distinctness
- 4.
Ante Rem realism and the foundations of linguistics
- 4.1Mathematical structuralism
- 4.2Linguistic structures
- 4.3Natural types
- 5.Conclusion
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (85)
Awodey, Steven. 1996. Structure in mathematics and logic: A categorical perspective. Philosophia Mathematica (3)4: 209–237.
Boolos, Geoffrey. 2000. Must we believe in set theory? In Between Logic and Intuition: Essays in Honor of Charles Parsons, Gila Sher & Richard Tieszen (eds), 257–268. Cambridge: CUP.
Bromberger, Sylvain. 1989. Types and tokens in linguistics. In Reflections on Chomsky, Alexander L. George (ed.), 58–90. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
. 1964. Current issues in linguistic theory. In The Structure of Language, Jerry A. Fodor & Jerrold J. Katz (eds), 50–118. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall.
. 1966. Cartesian Linguistics: A Chapter in the History of Rationalist Thought. New York NY: Harper & Row.
Chomsky, Noam. 1982. A note on the creative aspect of language use. The Philosophical Review XCI(3): 423–434.
. 1990. Language and the problems of knowledge. In The Philosophy of Language, Aloysius P. Matinich (ed.), 581–598. Oxford: OUP.
Drach, Margaret. 1981. The creative aspect of Chomsky’s use of the notion of creativity. Philosophical Review 90: 44–65.
Evans, Gareth. 1981[1985]. Semantic theory and tacit knowledge. In Gareth Evans: Collected Papers, Antonia Philipps (ed.), 322–342. Oxford: Clarendon.
Fodor, Jerrold A. 1981. Some notes on what linguistics is about. In Readings in the Philosophy of Psychology, Vol. II, Ned Block (ed.), 197–207. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Greenberg, Joseph. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Universals of Language, Joseph Greenberg (ed.), 73–113. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Hellman, Geoffrey. 1989. Mathematics without Numbers: Towards a Modal-Structural Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hilbert, David. 1899. Grundlagen der Geometrie. Leipzig: Teubner; Foundations of Geometry, trans. by E. J. Townsend. 1959. La Salle Il: Open Court.
Iemhoff, Rosalie. 2015. Intuitionism in the philosophy of mathematics. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.). <[URL]>
Katz, Jerrold J. 1971. Linguistic Philosophy: The Underlying Reality of Language and its Philosophical Import. London: Allen & Unwin.
1984. An outline of Platonist grammar. In Talking Minds: The Study of Language in the Cognitive Sciences, Thomas G. Bever, John M. Carroll & Lance A. Miller (eds.), 17–48. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Katz, Jerrold J. & Postal, Paul M.. 1991. Realism vs. conceptualism in linguistics. Linguistics and Philosophy 14(5): 515–554.
Kaufman, Daniel. 2002. Composite objects and the abstract/concrete distinction. Journal of Philosophical Research 27: 215–238.
Kirby, Simon. 1999. Learning, bottlenecks and infinity: A working model of evolution of syntactic communication. In Proceedings of the AISB’99 Symposium on Imitation in Animals and Artifacts, Kerstin Dautenhahn & Chrystopher Nehaniv (eds). Hove: Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behavior.
Langendoen, Terence. 2003. Merge. In Formal Approaches to Functional Phenomena: In Honor of Eloise Jelinek [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 62], Andrew Carnie, Mary Willie & Heidi Harley (eds), 307–318. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Langendoen, D. Terence. 2018. Languages as complete and distinct systems of reference. In Essays on Linguistic Realism, Christina Behme & Martin Neef (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume).
Lawrence, Stephen. 2003. Is linguistics a branch of psychology? In Epistemology of Language, Alex Barber (ed.), 69–106. Oxford: OUP.
Lewis, David. 1975. Languages and language. In The Philosophy of Language, Aloysius P. Matinich (ed.), 3–35. Oxford: OUP.
Lieb, Hans-Heinrich. 1992. The case for a New Structuralism. In Prospects for a New Structuralism [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 96], Hans-Heinrich Lieb (ed.), 33–72. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2018. Describing linguistic objects in a realist way. In Essays on Linguistic Realism, Christina Behme & Martin Neef (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume).
Linsky, Bernhard & Edward N. Zalta. 1995. Naturalized Platonism vs. Platonized naturalism. Journal of Philosophy xcii(10): 525–555.
Neef, Martin. 2018. Autonomous declarative phonology: A realist approach to the phonology of German. In Essays on Linguistic Realism, Christina Behme & Martin Neef (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume).
Nefdt, Ryan. 2016a. Linguistic modelling and the scientific enterprise. Language Sciences 54: 43–57.
. 2016b. Scientific modelling in generative grammar and the dynamic turn in syntax. Linguistics and Philosophy 39(5): 357–394.
Peirce, Charles. 1958. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol. 4. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Pullum, Geoffrey. 2011. On the mathematical foundations of syntactic structures. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 20(3): 277–296.
Pullum, Geoffrey & Scholz, Barbara. 2010. Recursion and the infinitude claim. In Recursion in Human Language [Studies in Generative Grammar 104], Harry van der Hulst (ed.), 113–138. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Pylyshyn, Zenon. 1973. What the mind’s eye tells the mind’s brain: A critique of mental imagery. Psycholological Bulletin 80: 1–24.
Quine, Willard. 1972. Methodological reflections on current linguistic theory. In Semantics of Natural Language, Donald Davidson & Gilbert Harman (eds), 442–454. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Rey, Georges. 2006. Conventions, intuitions and linguistic inexistents: A reply to Devitt. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 6: 549–569.
Shieber, Stuart. 1985. Evidence against the context-freeness of natural language. In The Formal Complexity of Natural Language [Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 33], Walter J. Savitch, Emmon Bach, William E. Marsh & Gila Safran-Naveh (eds), 320–334. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Shieber, Stuart & Schabes, Yves. 1991. Synchronous tree-adjoining grammars. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Hans Karlgren (ed.). Helsinki: Helsingiensis Universitas.
Stainton, Robert. 2014. Philosophy of Linguistics. Oxford Handbooks Online. <[URL]>
Stanley, Jason & Szabó, Zoltan. 2000. On quantifier domain restriction. Mind & Language 15(2–3): 219–261.
Wetzel, Linda. 2014. Types and Tokens. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta, (ed.). <[URL]>
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Forker, Diana
Lieb, Hans-Heinrich
2021. Theories of language, language comparison, and grammatical description. In Linguistic Categories, Language Description and Linguistic Typology [Typological Studies in Language, 132], ► pp. 137 ff.
Nefdt, Ryan M.
Nefdt, Ryan M.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
