In:Essays on Linguistic Realism:
Edited by Christina Behme and Martin Neef
[Studies in Language Companion Series 196] 2018
► pp. 1–6
Chapter 1The ontology of natural language
Published online: 26 July 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.196.01pos
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.196.01pos
Abstract
This chapter discusses natural language ontology, focusing on the nature of sentences. Two contrasting views about such elements are considered. First, the naturalistic view takes sentences to be elements of the physical world. There are two variants. One, which regards sentences as utterances, has few if any current advocates. The other, which views sentences as mental/biological things, is currently dominant, defining the position of Noam Chomsky. Second, there is the nonnaturalistic, Platonist view advocated intensively by Jerrold J. Katz, which takes sentences to be abstract objects. This view is consistent with the fact that sentences are timeless, locationless entities entering into no causal relations. Only the naturalistic view is inconsistent with actual linguistics, where sentences are uniformly treated in set-theoretical terms.
Keywords: sentence, ontology, Platonist view, biolinguistics, naturalistic imperative
References (12)
. 2012. Chomsky’s foundational admission. lingbuzz/001569 <[URL]>.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Swiggers, Pierre
2023. Review of Aarssen, Genis & van der Veken (2018–2020). Historiographia Linguistica 50:2-3 ► pp. 353 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
