In:Changing Structures: Studies in constructions and complementation
Edited by Mark Kaunisto, Mikko Höglund and Paul Rickman
[Studies in Language Companion Series 195] 2018
► pp. 129–149
The use of optional complement markers in present-day English
The role of passivization and other complexity factors
Published online: 22 May 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.195.08roh
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.195.08roh
This paper reports on the results of a corpus-based study exploring several major types of omissible complement clause markers. Throughout, the distribution of rival variants with or without these markers is accounted for in terms of the Complexity Principle correlating processing complexity and grammatical explicitness. The focus is on the use of passivized matrix verbs as well as other complexity factors in the active, which favour the more explicit variants containing the function words in question. At the same time, the paper registers, wherever practical and instructive, any parallels and differences between British and American English. In most cases, the variation phenomena in question are the result of ongoing developments either introducing or reducing the use of the relevant function words.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The complementizer that
- 2.1Verb-dependent complement clauses
- 2.2Noun-dependent complement clauses
- 3.Infinitive marking
- 4.Modal should in mandative complements
- 5.The variable use of from introducing gerundial complements
- 5.1Negative verbs of causation like put off
- 5.2The particle verb hold off
- 6.Interrogative complement clauses
- 7.Conclusion
References
References (54)
Primary sources
d91-00, 02, 04-05 The Daily Telegraph and Sunday Telegraph on CD-ROM 1991–2000, 2002, 2004–2005. Chadwyck-Healey/ProQuest. (478,837,273 words)
D92-95 Detroit Free Press on CD-ROM 1992–1995. Knight Ridder Information Inc. (102,989,512 words)
g90-05 The Guardian (including The Observer 1994–2005) on CD-ROM 1990–2005. Chadwyck-Healey/ProQuest. (645,817,821 words)
i93-94, 02-05 The Independent and The Independent on Sunday on CD-ROM 1993–94, 2002–2005. ProQuest. (242,608,117 words)
L92-95 The Los Angeles Times on CD-ROM 1992–1995 Knight Ridder Information Inc. (320,016,164 words)
L96-99 The Los Angeles Times 1996–1999 (courtesy of The Los Angeles Times Editorial Library). (275,506,490 words)
LOB The Lancaster-Oslo/Bergen Corpus on CD-ROM 1961. ICAME. (1,000,000 words)
m93-00 The Daily Mail and The Mail on Sunday on CD-ROM 1993–2000. Chadwyck-Healey. (206,762,410 words)
N01 The New York Times on CD-ROM 2001. ProQuest. (52,132,979 words)
NCF Nineteenth Century Fiction 1999–2000 Chadwyck-Healey. (37,589,837 words)
t90-04 The Times and The Sunday Times on CD-ROM 1990–2004 Chadwyck-Healey/ProQuest. (729,848,339 words)
W90-92 The Washington Times (including Insight on the News 1990–1992) on CD-ROM 1990–1992. Wayzata Technology. (93,889,488 words)
Secondary sources
Atkinson, Martin, Kilby, David & Roca, Iggy. 1988. Foundations of General Linguistics, 2nd edn. London: Unwin Hyman.
Clark, Herbert & Clark, Eve. 1977. Psychology and Linguistics: An Introduction to Psycholinguistics. New York NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Davison, Alice & Lutz, Richard. 1985. Measuring syntactic complexity relative to discourse context. In Natural Language Parsing, David R. Dowty, Lauri Karttunen & Arnold M. Zwicky (eds), 26–66. Cambridge: CUP. doi:
Eitelmann, Matthias. 2016. Support for end-weight as a determinant of linguistic variation and change. English Language and Linguistics 20: 395–420.
Elsness, Johan. 1984.
That or zero? A look at the choice of object clause connective in a corpus of American English. English Studies 65: 519–533. doi:
Givón, Talmy. 1984/1990. Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction, Vols. I–II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:
Hawkins, John A. 1999. Processing complexity and filler-gap dependencies across grammars. Language 75: 244–285. doi:
Horn, Laurence R. 1978. Some aspects of negation. In Universals of Language, Vol. IV, Joseph Greenberg (ed.), 127–210. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
Hundt, Marianne. 2009.
Colonial lag, colonial innovation or simply language change?
In One Language, Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English, Günter Rohdenburg & Julia Schlüter (eds), 13–37. Cambridge: CUP. doi:
Iyeri, Yoko. 2010. Verbs of Implicit Negation and their Complements in the History of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:
Iyeri, Yoko. 2012. The complements of causative make in Late Middle English. In Middle and Modern English Corpus Linguistics: A Multi-Dimensional Approach [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 50], Manfred Markus, Yoko Iyeri, Reinhard Heuberger & Emil Chamson (eds), 59–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:
Kjellmer, Göran. 2009. The revived subjunctive. In One Language, Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English, Günter Rohdenburg & Julia Schlüter (eds.), 246–256. Cambridge: CUP. doi:
Lohse, Barbara, Hawkins, John A. & Wasow, Thomas. 2004. Processing domains in English verb-particle constructions. Language 80: 238–261. doi:
Mair, Christian. 1995. Changing patterns of complementation, and concomitant grammaticalisation, of the verb help in present-day English. In The Verb in Contemporary English: Theory and Description, Bas Aarts & Charles F. Meyer (eds), 258–272. Cambridge: CUP.
Mair, Christian. 2002. Three changing patterns of verb complementation in Late Modern English: A real-time study based on matching text corpora. English Language and Linguistics 6: 105–131. doi:
McDavid, Virginia. 1964. The alternation of “that” and zero in noun clauses. American Speech 39: 102–113. doi:
Mondorf, Britta. 2009. More support for more-support: The Role of Processing Constraints on the Choice between Synthetic and Analytic Comparative Forms [Studies in Language Variation 4]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:
Mustanoja, Tauno F. 1960. A Middle English Syntax, Part I: Parts of Speech. Helsinki: Societé Néophilologique.
Rohdenburg, Günter. 1996. Cognitive complexity and increased grammatical explicitness in English. Cognitive Linguistics 7: 149–182. doi:
Rohdenburg, Günter. 2000. The complexity principle as a factor determining grammatical variation and change in English. In , Language Use Language Acquisition and Language History: (Mostly) Empirical Studies in Honour of Rüdiger Zimmermann, Ingo Plag & Klaus Peter Schneider (eds), 25–44. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.
Rohdenburg, Günter. 2002. Processing complexity and the variable use of prepositions in English. In Perspectives on Prepositions, Hubert Cuyckens & Günter Radden (eds), 79–100. Tübingen: Niemeyer. doi:
Rohdenburg, Günter. 2003. Cognitive complexity and horror aequi as factors determining grammatical variation and change in English. In Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English, Günter Rohdenburg & Britta Mondorf (eds), 205–249. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi:
Rohdenburg, Günter. 2006a. The role of functional constraints in the evolution of the English complementation system. In Syntax, Style and Grammatical Norms: English from 1500–2000, Christiane Dalton-Puffer, Dieter Kastovsky, Nikolaus Ritt & Herbert Schendl (eds), 143–166. Bern: Peter Lang.
Rohdenburg, Günter. 2006b. Processing complexity and competing sentential variants in present-day English. In Linguistik International: Festschrift für Heinrich Weber, Wilfried Kürschner & Reinhard Rapp (eds), 51–67. Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.
Rohdenburg, Günter. 2007. Functional constraints in syntactic change: The rise and fall of prepositional constructions in Early and Late Modern English. English Studies 88: 217–233. doi:
Rohdenburg, Günter. 2009. Grammatical divergence between British and American English in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. In Current Issues in Late Modern English, Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade & Wim van der Wurff (eds), 301–329. Bern: Peter Lang.
Rohdenburg, Günter. 2012. Britisches und Amerikanisches Englisch: Eine Sprache, zwei Grammatiken? In Sprachmythen – Fiktion oder Wirklichkeit?, Lieselotte Anderwald (ed), 137–160. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Rohdenburg, Günter. 2014b. Relative clauses of reason in British and American English. American Speech 89: 288–311. doi:
Rohdenburg, Günter. 2015. The embedded negation constraint and the choice between more or less explicit clausal structures in English. In Perspectives on Complementation: Theory, Structure and Variation, Mikko Höglund, Paul Rickman, Juhani Rudanko & Jukka Havu (eds), 101–127. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rohdenburg, Günter. 2016. Testing two processing principles with respect to the extraction of elements out of complement clauses in English. English Language and Linguistics 20: 463–486.
Rohdenburg, Günter & Schlüter, Julia. 2000. Determinanten grammatischer Variation im Früh- und Spätneuenglischen. Sprachwissenschaft 25: 443–496.
Rohdenburg, Günter & Schlüter, Julia. 2009. New departures. In , One Language Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English, Günter Rohdenburg & Julia Schlüter (eds), 364–423. Cambridge: CUP. doi:
Schlüter, Julia. 2005. Rhythmic Grammar: The Influence of Rhythm on Grammatical Variation and Change in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi:
Schlüter, Julia. 2009. The conditional subjunctive. In , One Language Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English, Günter Rohdenburg & Julia Schlüter (eds), 277–305. Cambridge: CUP. doi:
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Smith, Jennifer. 2005.
No momentary fancy! The zero ‘complementizer’ in English dialects. English Language and Linguistics 9: 289–309. doi:
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
ROMASANTA, RAQUEL P.
Vosberg, Uwe
Rohdenburg, Günter
BERG, THOMAS, TIM ZINGLER & ARNE LOHMANN
García‐Castro, Laura
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
