Cover not available

In:Germanic Genitives
Edited by Tanja Ackermann, Horst J. Simon and Christian Zimmer
[Studies in Language Companion Series 193] 2018
► pp. 312

References (22)
References
Abraham, Werner. 1997. The interdependence of case, aspect, and referentiality in the history of German: The case of the genitive. In Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, Ans van Kemenade & Nigel Vincent (eds), 29–61. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Datives: Structural vs. inherent — Abstract vs. morphological — Autonomous vs. combinatory — Universally vs. language-specifically configured? In Datives and Other Cases: Between Argument Structure and Event Structure [Studies in Language Companion Series 75], Daniel Hole, André Meinunger & Werner Abraham (eds), 3–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Abraham, Werner & Leiss, Elisabeth. 2012. The case differential: Syntagmatic versus paradigmatic case – Its status in synchrony and diachrony. Transactions of the Philological Society 110: 316–341. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. 2013. The marker of the English “Group Genitive” is a special clitic, not an inflection. In Börjars, Denison & Scott (eds), 193–217.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blake, Barry J. 2004. Case, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Börjars, Kersti, Denison, David & Scott, Alan K. (eds). 2013. Morphosyntactic Categories and the Expression of Possession. [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 199]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carlier, Anne & Verstraete, Jean-Christophe (eds). 2013. The Genitive. [Case and Grammatical Relations across Languages 5]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Donaldson, Bruce C. 2008. Dutch: A Comprehensive Grammar, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Donhauser, Karin. 1990. Moderne Kasuskonzeptionen und die Kasussetzung im Althochdeutschen. Überlegungen zur Stellung des Objektgenitivs im Althochdeutschen. In Neuere Forschungen zur historischen Syntax des Deutschen. Referate der Internationalen Fachkonferenz Eichstätt 1989 [Reihe Germanistische Linguistik 103], Anne Betten (ed.), 98–112. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. Das Genitivproblem und (k)ein Ende? Anmerkungen zur aktuellen Diskussion um die Ursachen des Genitivschwundes im Deutschen. In Historische germanische und deutsche Syntax. Akten des Internationalen Symposiums anläßlich des 100. Geburtstages von Ingerid Dal. Oslo, 27.9.-1.10.1995 [Osloer Beiträge Zur Germanistik 21], John Ole Askedal (ed.), 69–86. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fleischer, Jürg & Simon, Horst J. 2013. Vom Wert sprachwandelvergleichenden Arbeitens. In Sprachwandelvergleich – Comparing Diachronies [Linguistische Arbeiten 550], Jürg Fleischer & Horst J. Simon (eds), 1‒14. Berlin: De Gruyter Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heindl, Olga. 2017. Aspekt und Genitivobjekt: Eine kontrastiv-typologische Untersuchung zweier Phänomene der historischen germanischen Syntax [Stauffenburg Mediävistik 1]. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli & Eythórsson, Thórhallur. 2011. Structured exceptions and case selection in Insular Scandinavian. In Expecting the Unexpected: Exceptions in Grammar [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 216], Horst J. Simon & Heike Wiese (eds), 213–241. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli. 2013. Two types of case variation. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 36: 5–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leiss, Elisabeth. 1991. Grammatische Kategorien und sprachlicher Wandel: Erklärung des Genitivschwunds im Deutschen. In Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Linguists. Berlin/DDR, 10.–15. August 1987, Werner Bahner, Joachim Schildt & Dieter Viehweger (eds.), 1406–1409. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leiss, Elisabeth. 2000. Artikel und Aspekt. Die grammatischen Muster von Definitheit [Studia Linguistica Germanica 55]. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosenbach, Anette. 2014. English genitive variation – The state of the art. English Language and Linguistics 18: 215–262. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schrodt, Richard. 1992. Die Opposition von Objektsgenitiv und Objektsakkusativ in der deutschen Sprachgeschichte: Syntax oder Semantik oder beides? Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur (PBB) 114: 361–394. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scott, Alan K. 2011. Everyday language in the spotlight: The decline of the genitive case. German as a Foreign Language 12: 53–70.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014. The Genitive Case in Dutch and German. A Study of Morphosyntactic Change in Codified Languages [Brill’s Studies in Historical Linguistics 2]. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szczepaniak, Renata. 2014. Sprachwandel und sprachliche Unsicherheit. Der formale und funktionale Wandel des Genitivs seit dem Frühneuhochdeutschen. In Sprachverfall? Dynamik – Wandel – Variation [Institut für Deutsche Sprache Jahrbuch 2013], Albrecht Plewnia & Andreas Witt (eds), 33–49. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weerman, Fred & De Wit, Petra. 1999. The decline of the genitive in Dutch. Linguistics 37: 1155–1192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue