Cover not available

In:Functionalist and Usage-based Approaches to the Study of Language: In honor of Joan L. Bybee
Edited by K. Aaron Smith and Dawn Nordquist
[Studies in Language Companion Series 192] 2018
► pp. 17–58

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Constructional pressures on ‘sit’ in Modern Greek

 | San José State University
Published online: 1 March 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.192.02svo
Abstract
This study argues for a constructional account of the non-postural senses of Modern Greek verb kaθοme ‘I sit’. Corpus data provide a detailed account of the constructional pressures on kaθοme as V1 in conjunctive coordination of verbs (V1 and V2) and show that the non-postural senses emerge in syntactically compact versions of the string with shared subject and tense/aspect where locative adverbials and posture and disposition adjectives, characteristic of the postural interpretations, never occur. In such uses, the morphologically coded aspectual frame further determines a deliberate action or an extended duration interpretation framing V2 verbs, typically of mental activity or communication. Pragmatic inferences tied to the construction provide further motivation for considering the string a form-meaning composite.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The semantics and morphology of kaθοme ‘I sit’
  • 3.Coordination and pseudo-coordination
  • 4.Why corpus methodology?
  • 5.Contextual cues
    • 5.1Semantic types of coordination
    • 5.2Tense and aspect
    • 5.3Semantic types and tense/aspect correlation
    • 5.4Syntactic compactness of the string
    • 5.5Semantic types and their structural traces
      • Extended
      • Deliberate
      • Simultaneous
      • Sequential
      • Collection
    • 5.6Subject Person/Number
    • 5.7V2 verbs and their frames
    • 5.8Pragmatic confluences
    • 5.9Summary
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
  • Appendix
References (29)
References
Corpus of Modern Greek, Russian Academy of Sciences. <[URL]> (36 million tokens)
Corpus of Greek Texts. <[URL]> (30 million tokens)
Hellenic National Corpus, Institute of Language and Speech Processing. <[URL]> (1990-current) (47 million tokens)
Bybee, Joan L. 2015. Language Change. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013. Usage-based theory and exemplar representations of consrtuctions. In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, Thomas Hoffman & Graeme Trousdale (eds,), 49–69. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William & Cruise, D. Alan. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Vos, Mark Andrew. 2005. The Syntax of Verbal Pseudo-coordination in English and Afrikaans. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
FrameNet Glossary. 2016. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Hebb, Donald O. 2002[1949]. The Organization of Behavior: A Neuropsychological Theory. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania. 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin & Koops, Christian. 2009. A quantitative approach to the development of complex predicates: The case of Swedish pseudo-coordination with sitta ‘sit’. In Syntactic Complexity: Diachrony, Acquisition, Neuro-cognition, Evolution [Typological Studies in Languages 85], T. Givón & Masatyoshi Shibatani (eds), 145–162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuteva, Tania A. 1999. On ‘sit’/’stand’/’lie’ auxiliation. Linguistics 37(2): 191–213. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 2012. Elliptic coordination. Cognitive Linguistics 23(3): 555–599. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lemmens, Maarten. 2005. Aspectual posture verb constructions in Dutch. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 17(3): 183–217. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lødrup, Helge. 2002. The syntactic structures of Norwegian pseudocoordinations. Studia Linguistica 56(2): 121–143. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Newman, John (ed.). 2002. The Linguistics of Sitting, Standing, and Lying [Typological Studies in Language 51]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Newman, John & Rice, Sally. 2004. Pattern of usage of sit, stand, and lie: A cognitively inspired exploration in corpus linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics 15(3): 351–396. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Asymmetry in English multi-verb sequences: A corpus-based approach. In Asymmetric Events [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 11], Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (ed.), 3–22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ross, Daniel. 2016. Between coordination and subordination: Typological, structural and diachronic perspectives on pseudocoordination. In Coordination and Subordination: Form and Meaning – Selected Papers from CSI Lisbon 2014, Fernanda Pratas, Sandra Pereira & Clara Pinto (eds), 209–243. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruppenhoffer, Josef, Ellsworth, Michael, Petruck, Miriam R. L., Johnson, Christopher R. & Scheffczyk, Jan. 2010. FrameNet II: Extended Theory and Practice. <[URL]>
Svorou, Soteria. In press. Motion verb integration and cosubordination in Modern Greek. In Applying and Expanding Role and Reference Grammar [HPSL – NIHIN Studies], Rolf Kalluweit, Lisann Künkel & Eva Staudinger (eds),163–185. Freiburg: Freiburg University Press.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme. 2014. Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Τριανταφυλλίδης, Μανόλης. 1998. Λεξικό της Κοινής Νεοελληνικής. Ινστιτούτο Νεοελληνικών Σπουδών του Αριστοτελείου Πανεπιστημίου Θεσσαλονίκης. <[URL]>
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. 2007. Recent developments in the Role and Reference Grammar theory of clause linkage. Language and Linguistics 8(1): 71–93.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wiklund, Anna-Lena. 2007. The Syntax of Tenselessness: Tense/mood/aspect-agreeing Infinitivals. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Onufrieva, E. S.
2023. Modern Greek Constructions with Position Verb <i>κάθομαι</i>. Nauchnyi dialog 12:10 ► pp. 104 ff. DOI logo
Giusti, Giuliana, Vincenzo Nicolò Di Caro & Daniel Ross
2022. Pseudo-Coordination and Multiple Agreement Constructions. In Pseudo-Coordination and Multiple Agreement Constructions [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 274], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Logozzo, Felicia & Liana Tronci
2022. Pseudo-coordination and serial verbs in Hellenistic Greek?. Journal of Greek Linguistics 22:1 ► pp. 72 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue