Cover not available

In:Cross-linguistic Correspondences: From lexis to genre
Edited by Thomas Egan and Hildegunn Dirdal
[Studies in Language Companion Series 191] 2017
► pp. 221–252

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 9
A corpus-based analysis of genre-specific multi-word combinations

Minutes in English and Spanish

 | University of Valladolid
Published online: 23 November 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.191.09san
Abstract
English and Spanish minutes both contain two vocabulary sets, one that codifies the ‘field’ and belongs in a given content area, and another that codifies the discursive practices of the genre ‘minutes’. This paper sets out to explore which multi-word combinations can be identified as genre- and step-specific, and what correspondences can be identified across languages. The study draws on an English–Spanish comparable corpus of meeting minutes, tagged on the rhetorical level. A comparable corpus browser with a basic statistic feature has been used to obtain step subcorpora and WordSmith Tools was used to obtain n-grams within rhetorical steps in each language. N-grams were classified as genre-specific, step-specific, field-related, function-word combination or noise. Empirical findings show that for each rhetorical move, irrespective of text ‘field’, a number of n-grams have become readily associated in each of the languages. Since word choice is determined by genre-bound expectations and by context, selections across languages are not obvious and correspondences show different grams and number of grams.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
  • 3.Material and method
    • 3.1Corpus-based move analysis: The rhetorical structure of minutes of meetings
    • 3.2Materials: The corpus
    • 3.3N-grams
  • 4.Results and discussion
    • 4.1Discussion n-grams
      • 4.1.1Discussion n-grams: English
      • 4.1.2Discussion n-grams: Spanish
      • 4.1.3Discussion n-grams: English–Spanish comparison
    • 4.2Adjourn n-grams
      • 4.2.1Adjourn n-grams: English
      • 4.2.2Adjourn n-grams: Spanish
      • 4.2.3Adjourn n-grams: English–Spanish comparison
    • 4.3N-grams: Adjourn–Discussion comparison
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
References (46)
References
Ahmad, Khurshid & Rogers, Margaret. 2001. Corpus linguistics and terminology extraction. In Handbook of Terminology Management, Vol. 2: Application-Oriented Terminology Management, Sue E. Wright & Budin Gerhard (eds), 725–760. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Altenberg, Bengt. 1998. On the phraseology of spoken English: The evidence of recurrent word-combinations. In Phraseology: Theory, Analysis, and Applications, Anthony Paul Cowie (ed.), 101–122. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anthony, Laurence. 2014. AntConc (Version 3.4.3) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University. <[URL]>
Bhatia, Vijay K. 1993. Analyzing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004. Worlds of Written Discourse: A Genre-based View. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Conrad, Susan & Cortes, Viviana. 2004. If you look at…: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics 25(3): 371–405. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Connor, Ulla & Upton, Thomas A. (eds). 2007. Discourse on the Move: Using Corpus Analysis to Describe Discourse Structure [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 28]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bowker, Janet. 2012. From ‘Communities of Practice’ to ‘Communities of Learning’: Interdiscursivity in Changing Corporate Priorities. In Researching Discourse in Business Genres, Paul Gillaerts, Elizabeth de Groot, Sylvain Dieltjens, Priscilla Heynderickx and Geert Jacobs (eds), 115–138. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bowker, Lynne. 2015. Terminology and translation. In Handbook of Terminology, Hendrik J. Kockaert & Frieda Steurs (eds), 304–323. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Connor, Ulla. 2000. Variation in rhetorical moves in grant proposals of US humanists and scientists. Text and Talk 20(1): 1–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cortes, Viviana. 2004. Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology. English for Specific Purposes 23(4): 397–423. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. The purpose of this study is to: Connecting lexical bundles and moves in research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 12(1): 33–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crossley, Scott. 2007. A chronotopic approach to genre analysis: An exploratory study. English for Specific Purposes 26(1): 4–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ding, Huiling. 2007. Genre analysis of personal statements: Analysis of moves in application essays to medical and dental schools. English for Specific Purposes 26(3): 368–392. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ebeling, Jarle & Ebeling, Signe Oksefjell. 2013. Patterns in Contrast [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 58]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forchini, Pierfranca & Murphy, Amanda. 2010. N-grams in comparable specialized corpora: Perspectives on phraseology, translation, and pedagogy. In Patterns, Meaningful Units and Specialized Discourses, [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 35], Ute Römer & Rainer Schulze (eds), 87–103. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan T. 2008. Phraseology and linguistic theory. In Phraseology: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, Sylviane Granger & Fanny Meunier (eds), 3–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Handford, Michael. 2010. The Language of Business Meetings. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Henry, Alex & Roseberry, Robert L. 2001. A narrow-angled corpus analysis of moves and strategies of the genre: ‘Letter of application’. English for Specific Purposes 20(2): 153–167. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan & Francis, Gill. 2000. Pattern grammar: A Corpus-driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 4]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan. 2002. Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2004. Genre and Second Language Writing. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes 27(1): 4–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kageura, Kyo. 2015. Terminology and Lexicography. In Handbook of Terminology, Hendrik J. Kockaert & Frieda Steurs (eds), 45–59. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kashiha, Hadi & Heng, Chan Swee. 2014. Structural analysis of lexical bundles in university lectures of politics and chemistry. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature 3(1): 224–230. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kwan, Becky S. C. 2006. The schematic structure of literature reviews in doctoral theses of applied linguistics. English for Specific Purposes 25(1): 30–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lindquist, Hans & Levin, Magnus. 2008. Foot and mouth: The phrasal patterns of two frequent nouns. In Phraseology: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, Sylviane Granger & Fanny Meunier (eds), 143–158. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paltridge, Brian. 1994. Genre analysis and the identification of textual boundaries. Applied Linguistics 15(3): 288–299. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rabadán, Rosa & Izquierdo, Marlén. 2012. Designing writing materials for the business English language class. In Intercultural Inspirations for Language Education: Spaces for Understanding, Ilona Semrádová (ed.), 46–55. Hradec Králové: University of Hradec Králové.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rabadán, Rosa, Pizarro, Isabel & Izquierdo, Marlén. 2013a. Generador de actas de reuniones en lengua inglesa (GARE). <[URL]>
. 2013b. C-GARE corpus <[URL]> (14 December 2015).
Saber, Anthony. 2012. Phraseological patterns in a large corpus of biomedical articles. In Corpus-Informed Research and Learning in ESP: Issues and applications, Alex Boulton, Shirley Carter-Thomas & Elizabeth Rowley-Jolivet (eds), 45–81. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salazar, Danika. 2014. Lexical Bundles in Native and Non-native Scientific Writing [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 65]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Samraj, Betty. 2014. Move structure. In Pragmatics of Discourse, Klaus P. Schneider & Anne Barron (eds), 385–406. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scott, Mike & Tribble, Christopher. 2006. Textual patterns: Key Words and Corpus Analysis in Language Education. [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 22]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scott, Mike. 2008. WordSmith tools (Version 5) [Computer Software]. Stroud: Lexical Analysis Software. <[URL]>
Stubbs, Michael. 2002. Two quantitative methods of studying phraseology in English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 7(1): 215–244. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swales, John M. 1981. Aspects of Article Introductions. Birmingham: The University of Aton, Language Studies Unit.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1990. Genre analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004. Research Genres: Exploration and Applications. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tardy, Christine M. & Swales, John M. 2014. Genre analysis. In Pragmatics of Discourse, Klaus P. Schneider & Anne Barron (eds), 165–188. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Upton, Thomas A. 2002. Understanding direct mail letters as a genre. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 7(1): 65–85. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Warburton, Kara. 2015. Managing terminology in commercial environments. In Handbook of Terminology, Hendrik J. Kockaert & Frieda Steurs (eds), 360–392. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolfe, Joanna. 2006. Meeting minutes as a rhetorical genre: Discrepancies between professional writing textbooks and workplace practice tutorial. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 49(4): 354–364. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Rabadán, Rosa, Isabel Pizarro & Hugo Sanjurjo-González
2021. Authoring support for Spanish language writers. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 34:2 ► pp. 671 ff. DOI logo
Ramón, Noelia & Belén Labrador
2018. Selling cheese online. Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication 24:2 ► pp. 210 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue