Cover not available

In:Pragmatic Approaches to Latin and Ancient Greek
Edited by Camille Denizot and Olga Spevak
[Studies in Language Companion Series 190] 2017
► pp. 113–136

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 6
Constituent order in directives with stative verbs in Latin

 | University of Santiago de Compostela
Published online: 1 November 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.190.06cab
Abstract
This paper considers constituent ordering in monovalent and bivalent constructions of two Latin stative verbs – sum ‘to be’ and fio ‘to become’ – when they appear in directives, assessing the degree of speaker-addressee interaction. We use Risselada’s classification of the different subtypes of directives based on the extent to which compliance with what the speaker expresses is obligatory. The findings reveal that, given (i) the difference in the number of arguments and in semantic content of monovalent and bivalent structures, and (ii) the incidence of modality (declarative/directive), the order of constituents different in each case. Furthermore, tendencies in constituent patterns are more uniform when expressions are more prototypically directive, although not in a wholly scalar way. Hence, the peculiarities or deviations observed require specific explanations, such as the structure of “world-creation”, the kind of proposal made, or the existence of expressions with different degrees of lexicalization.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction. Objectives, structure, and corpus
  • 2.Illocutionary force and verbal mood
  • 3.Brief overview of research
  • 4.Analysis
    • 4.1Monovalent constructions
      • 4.1.1‘Advice’ and ‘supplications’
      • 4.1.2‘Proposals’
    • 4.2Bivalent structures
      • 4.2.1‘Advice’
      • 4.2.2‘Proposals’
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (24)
References
Babič, Matjaz. 1992. Word order in Plautus: Interrogative and imperative sentences. Živa Antika 41(2): 56–63.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bauer, Brigitte L. M. 2009. Word order. In New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax, Vol. 1: Syntax of the Sentence, Philip Baldi & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds), 241–316. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cabrillana, Concepción. 1993. Posiciones relativas en la ordenación de constituyentes (I). Estudio de la posición de Sujeto, Objeto y Verbo. Habis 24: 249–266.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. Posiciones relativas en la ordenación de constituyentes (II). Estudio de la posición de Sujeto, Predicado nominal y Verbo. Habis 25: 451–460.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Locative structures in constructions with sum . In De lingua Latina novae quaestiones, Claude Moussy (ed.), 275–290. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Consideración sintáctico-semántica de esse. Santiago de Compostela: University of Santiago de Compostela.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016a. Directives in Latin comedy: Pragmatics, dramatic role and social status. Journal of Latin Linguistics 15(2): 179–214. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016b. Lexical domains in Latin predicative structures: ‘agentive’, fientive and stative types. In Latinitatis Rationes. Descriptive and Historical Accounts for the Latin Language, Paolo Poccetti (ed.), 312–331. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Devine, Andrew M. & Stephens, Laurence D. 2006. Latin Word Order. Structured Meaning and Information. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees. 1992. Non-verbal Predication. Theory, Typology, Diachrony. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lindsay, Wallace M. 1907. Syntax of Plautus. Oxford: James Parker and Co. (reprint 2002, London: Bristol Classical).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marouzeau, Jules. 1910. La phrase à verbe “être” en latin. Paris: Geuthner.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Panhuis, Dirk G. J. 1982. The Communicative Perspective in the Sentence. A Study of Latin Word Order [Studies in Language Companion Series 11]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinkster, Harm. 1995. Sintaxis y semántica del latín. Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Oxford Latin Syntax, Vol. 1: The Simple Clause. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Powell, Jonathan G. F. 2005. Cicero’s adaptation of legal Latin in the De legibus . In Aspects of the Language of Latin Prose, Tobias Reinhardt, Michael Lapidge & James N. Adams (eds), 117–150. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ridruejo, Emilio. 1999. Modo y modalidad. El modo en las subordinadas sustantivas. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Vol. II, I. Bosque & V. Demonte (eds), 3209–5321. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Risselada, Rodie. 1993. Imperatives and other Directive Expressions in Latin: A Study in the Pragmatics of a Dead Language. Amsterdam: J. C. Gieben.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salvi, Giampaolo. 2011. A formal approach to Latin word order. In Formal Linguistics and the Teaching of Latin. Theoretical and Applied Perspectives in Comparative Grammar, Renato Oniga, Rossella Iovino & Giuliana Giusti (eds), 23–50. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spevak, Olga. 2004. Verb-subject order in Latin: the case of existential and locative sentences. Classica et Mediaevalia 55: 381–386.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Constituent Order in Classical Latin Prose [Studies in Language Companion Series 117]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vairel-Carron, Hélène. 1975. Exclamation, ordre et défense: Analyse de deux systèmes syntaxiques en latin. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de la Villa, Jesús. 2003. Límites y alternancias de los marcos predicativos. In Praedicatiua. Complementación en griego y en latín, Anejo 53 de Verba, José Miguel Baños, Concepción Cabrillana, M. Esperanza Torrego & Jesús de la Villa (eds), 19–49. Santiago de Compostela: University of Santiago de Compostela.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Warner, Richard W. 1980. Word order in Old Latin: Copulative clauses. Orbis 29: 251–263.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Cabrillana, Concepción
2019. Expresiones directivas con verbos de uso copulativo en la comedia latina. Glotta 95:1 ► pp. 8 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue