Cover not available

In:Pragmatic Approaches to Latin and Ancient Greek
Edited by Camille Denizot and Olga Spevak
[Studies in Language Companion Series 190] 2017
► pp. 17–44

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 2
Illocutionary force and modality

How to tackle the issue in Ancient Greek

 | University Autónoma of Madrid
Published online: 1 November 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.190.02rev
Abstract
The first part of this chapter discusses the linguistic and non-linguistic tools available for studying illocutionary force and modality in Ancient Greek; the second part applies these findings to the study of the diachronic evolution of ó:phelon (ὤφελον) from a verb into an illocutionary particle. As I will try to prove, this diachronic evolution is driven by pragmatic principles and the different steps in this evolution have a formal reflection in the linguistic context (modal attraction of subordinate clauses, use of negations, word order and so on). The chapter follows the model of previous research that shows the usefulness of a pragmatic approach for explaining the linguistic data of so-called dead languages. This chapter adds a diachronic perspective.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Internal analysis of Greek data
    • 2.1Illocutionary and modality verbs
      • 2.1.1Performatives and metadirectives
        • a.Imperative sentences
        • b.Interrogatives
        • c.Declaratives
      • 2.1.2Verbs conveying modality
      • 2.1.3Verbal forms conflating illocutionary force and modality
      • 2.1.4Diachronic evolution: From verbs into particles
    • 2.2Particles
    • 2.3Discursive context
    • 2.4Subordinate mood selection
  • 3.Comparative and typological parallels
  • 4.Grammarians
  • 5.A case study: ó:phelon (ὤφελον)
    • 5.1Stages I–II: From lexical verb to modal verb
    • 5.2Stage III: Counterfactual assertions
    • 5.3Stage IV: From declarative to desiderative counterfactuals
    • 5.4Stage V: Development from verb into particle
    • 5.5Stage VI: Extension to non-counterfactual wishes
  • 6.Summary and conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (27)
References
Allan, Rutger J. 2013. Exploring modality’s semantic space. Grammaticalization, subjectification and the case of ὀφείλω. Glotta 89: 1–46. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Denniston, John Dewar. 1954. The Greek Particles. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Denizot, Camille. 2011. Donner des ordres en grec ancien: Étude linguistique des formes de l’injonction. Mont-Saint-Aignan: Publications des Universités de Rouen et du Havre.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Impolite orders in Ancient Greek? The οὐκ ἐρεῖς; type. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 13(1): 110–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dik, Simon C. 1997. The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part 1: The Structure of the Clause. Part 2: Complex and Derived Constructions, edited by Kees Hengeveld. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ernout, Alfred & Thomas, François. 1964 3. Syntaxe Latine. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Faure, Richard. 2010. Les Subordonnées interrogatives dans la prose grecque classique. Les questions constituantes. PhD dissertation, Université Paris-Sorbonne.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garrido Medina, Joaquín. 1999. Los actos de habla. Las oraciones imperativas. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua Española, Vol. III, Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds), 3879–928. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, William W. 1889. Syntax of the Moods and Tenses of the Greek Verb. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hofmann, Johann Baptist & Szantyr, Anton. 1965. Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2003 2. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horrocks, Geoffrey. 2010 2. Greek. A History of the Language and its Speakers. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kamerbeek, Jan C. 1967. Oedipus Tyrannus. The Plays of Sophocles, IV. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kissine, Mikhail. 2012. Sentences, utterances, and speech acts. In The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics, Keith Allan & Kasia M. Jaszczolt (eds), 169–91. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kroon, Caroline. 1995. Discourse Particles in Latin. A Study of nam, enim, autem, vero and at. Amsterdam: J. C. Gieben.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kühner, Raphael & Gerth, Bernhard. 1898–1904 3. Ausführliche Grammatik der griechischen Sprache, 2: Satzlehre, 2 Vols. Hannover: Hahnsche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1987 4. Pragmatics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mayser, Edwin. 1970. Grammatik der griechischen Papyri aus der Ptolemäerzeit mit Einschluss der gleichzeitigen Ostraka und der in Ägypten verfassten Inschriften, Vols I–VI. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Revuelta Puigdollers, Antonio R. 1994. El significado del subjuntivo deliberativo en griego antiguo. In Quid ultra faciam? Trabajos de griego, latín e indoeuropeo en conmemoración de los 25 años de la Universidad Autónoma, Luis M. Aparicio et al. (eds), 75–86. Madrid: Ediciones de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014. Particles (Syntactic features). In Encyclopedia of Ancient Greek Language and Linguistics, Vol. 3, Georgios Giannakis, Vit Bubenik, Chris Golston, Alexandra Lianeri, Silvia Luraghi & Stephanos Matthaios (eds.), 31–41. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2017. Ὤφελ(λ)ον in Ancient Greek counterfactual desiderative sentences: From verb to modal particle. In Variation and Change in Ancient Greek Tense, Aspect and Modality, Klaas Bentein, Mark Janse & Joric Soltic (eds) 158–188. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rijksbaron, Albert. 2002 3. The Syntax and Semantics of the Verb in Classical Greek. Amsterdam: Gieben.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Risselada, Rodie. 1993. Imperatives and Other Directive Expressions in Latin: A Study in the Pragmatics of a Dead Language. Amsterdam: J. C. Gieben.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sbisà, Marina & Turner, Ken (eds). 2013. Pragmatics of Speech Actions [Handbooks of Pragmatics, Vol. 2]. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, Carmen. 1995. Contextual conditions for the interpretation of poder and deber in Spanish. In Modality in Grammar and Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 32], Joan Bybee & Suzanne Fleischman (eds), 67–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Touratier, Christian. 1994. Syntaxe latine. Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wakker, Gerry. 1997. Emphasis and Affirmation: Some Aspects of μήν in Tragedy. In New Approaches to Greek Particles, Albert Rijksbaron (ed.), 209–31. Amsterdam: J. C. Gieben.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Verano, Rodrigo
2023. Los imperativos λέγε y εἰπέ en los diálogos de Platón: aproximación desde el Análisis de la Conversación. Emerita 91:1 ► pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
La Roi, Ezra
2020. The Variation of Classical Greek Wishes. Glotta 96:1 ► pp. 213 ff. DOI logo
la Roi, Ezra
2022. Weaving together the diverse threads of category change. Diachronica 39:2 ► pp. 159 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue