Cover not available

In:Pragmatic Approaches to Latin and Ancient Greek
Edited by Camille Denizot and Olga Spevak
[Studies in Language Companion Series 190] 2017
► pp. 114

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (65)
References
Abraham, Werner. 2016. Discourse marker = discourse particle = thetical = modal particle? A futile comparison. In Discourse Particles. Formal Approaches to their Syntax and Semantics [Linguistische Arbeiten 564], Josef Bayer & Volker Struckmeier (eds), 241–280. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Adams, James N. 1984. Female speech in Latin comedy. Antichthon 18: 43–77. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aijmer, Karin. 2013. Understanding Pragmatic Markers: A Variational Pragmatic Approach. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Allan, Keith & Jaszczolt, Kasia M. 2012 (eds). The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Austin, John L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakker, Stephanie. 2009. The Noun Phrase in Ancient Greek: A Functional Analysis of the Order and Articulation of NP Constituents in Herodotus [Amsterdam Studies in Classical Philology 15]. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakker, Stephanie & Wakker, Gerry (eds). 2009. Discourse Cohesion in Ancient Greek [Amsterdam Studies in Classical Philology 16]. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baños Baños, José Miguel (coord.). 2009. Sintaxis del latín clásico, Madrid: Liceus.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barrios-Lech, Peter G. 2016. Linguistic Interaction in Roman Comedy. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biraud, Michèle. 2010. Les interjections du théâtre grec antique. Étude sémantique et pragmatique. Louvain-la-Neuve: Peeters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolkestein, A. Machtelt. 1998. What to do with topic and focus? Evaluating pragmatic information. In Functional Grammar and Verbal Interaction [Studies in Language Companion Series 44], Mike Hannay & A. Machtelt, Bolkestein (eds), 193–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bonifazi, Anna, Drummen, Annemieke & de Kreij, Mark. 2016. Particles in Ancient Greek Discourse: Five Volumes Exploring Particle Use across Genres [Hellenic Studies Series 74]. Washington DC: Center for Hellenic Studies. <[URL]> (24 November 2016).
Broth, Mathias & Mondada, Lorenza. 2013. Walking away: The embodied achievement of activity closings in mobile interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 47(1): 41–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen C. 1987. Politeness, Some Universals in Language Usage, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cabrillana, Concepción. 1999. Type of text, pragmatic function and constituent order: A comparative study between the Mulomedicina Chironis and the Peregrinatio Egeriae . In Latin vulgaire-latin tardif V, Hubert Petersmann & Rudolf Kettemann (eds), 319–30. Winter: Heidelberg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crespo, Emilio, Conti, Luz & Maquieira, Helena. 2003. Sintaxis del griego clásico. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan (ed.). 2011. Historical Sociopragmatics [Benjamins Current Topics 31]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Denizot, Camille. 2011. Donner des ordres en grec ancien: Étude linguistique des formes de l’injonction. Mont-Saint-Aignan: Publications des Universités de Rouen et du Havre.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Impolite orders in Ancient Greek? The οὐκ ἐρεῖς; type. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 13(1): 110–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Denniston, John D. 1954. The Greek Particles, revised by Kenneth J. Dover. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Devine, Andrew M. & Stephens, Laurence D. 2006. Latin Word Order. Structured Meaning and Information. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dickey, Eleanor. 1996. Greek Forms of Address: From Herodotus to Lucian. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Latin Forms of Address: From Plautus to Apuleius. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. The rules of politeness and Latin request formulae. In Laws and Rules in Indo-European, Philomen Probert & Andreas Willi (eds), 313–28. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dik, Helma. 1995. Word Order in Ancient Greek: A Pragmatic Account of Word Order Variation in Herodotus. Amsterdam: J. C. Gieben.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Word Order in Greek Tragic Dialogue. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dik, Simon. 1997. The Theory of Functional Grammar, 2 Vols., 2nd edn revised by Kees Hengeveld. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dostie, Gaétane. 2004. Pragmaticalisation et marqueurs discursifs: Analyse sémantique et traitement lexicographique. Brussels: De Boeck-Duculot. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald. 1998. Dire et ne pas dire. Principes de sémantique linguistique, 3rd edn. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 1998. Pragmatic research: Methodological issues. In Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics, Jacob L. Mey (ed.), 710–12. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics 31: 931–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldstein, David. 2016. Classical Greek Syntax: Wackernagel’s Law in Herodotus. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds), 41–58. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hall, Jon. 2009. Politeness and Politics in Cicero’s Letters. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hand, Ferdinand G. 1829–1845. Tursellinus seu de particulis Latinis commentarii, 4 Vols. Leipzig: Weidmann (reprint 1969, Amsterdam, Hakkert).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herring, Susan C., van Reenen, Pieter & Schøsler, Lene. 2000. Textual Parameters in Older Languages [Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science. Series 4; Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 195]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. 1994. The feasibility of historical pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics 22: 533–536. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. & Taavitsainen, Irma. 2010. Historical Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine. 1990–1992. Les Interactions verbales. Paris: A. Colin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kroon, Caroline. 1995. Discourse Particles in Latin: A Study of nam, enim, autem, vero and at. Amsterdam: Gieben.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mey, Jacob L. 1998. Pragmatics. In Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics, Jacob L. Mey (ed.), 716–34. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muchnová, Dagmar. 2011. Entre conjonction, connecteur et particule: Le cas de ἐπεί en grec ancien. Étude syntaxique, sémantique et pragmatique. Prague: Karolinum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Panhuis, Dirk. 1982. The Communicative Perspective in the Sentence: A Study of Latin Word Order [Studies in Language Companion Series 11]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinkster, Harm. 1991. Evidence for SVO in Latin? In Latin and the Romance Languages in the Early Middle Ages, Roger Wright (ed.), 69–82. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1990/1995. Sintaxis y semántica del latín, revised and enhanced edn. of Latin Syntax and Semantics . Madrid: Ed. Clásicas. <[URL]> (3 January 2017).
. 2015. The Oxford Latin Syntax, Vol.1: The Simple Clause. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (In preparation). The Oxford Latin Syntax, Vol. 2.
Rijksbaron, Albert (ed.). 1997. New Approaches to Greek Particles. Proceedings of the Colloquium held in Amsterdam, January 4–6, 1996, to Honour C. J. Ruijgh. Amsterdam: Gieben.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Risselada, Rodie. 1993. Imperatives and Other Directive Expressions in Latin: A Study in the Pragmatics of a Dead Language. Amsterdam: Gieben.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosén, Hannah. 2009. Coherence, sentence modification, and sentence-part modification: The contribution of particles. In New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax, Philip Baldi & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds), Vol. 1, 317–441. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold. 2004. Speech acts. In The Handbook of Pragmatics, Laurence R. Horn & Gregory Ward (eds), 53–73. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scheppers, Frank. 2011. The Colon Hypothesis: Word Order, Discourse Segmentation and Discourse Coherence in Ancient Greek. Brussels: VUB Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schrickx, Josine. 2011. Lateinische Modalpartikeln: Nempe, quippe, scilicet, videlicet und nimirum [Amsterdam Studies in Classical Philology 19]. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1979. Expression and Meaning. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spevak, Olga. 2010. Constituent Order in Classical Latin Prose [Studies in Language Companion Series 117]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. The Noun Phrase in Classical Latin Prose [Amsterdam Studies in Classical Philology 21]. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2004. Historical Pragmatics. In The Handbook of Pragmatics, Laurence R. Horn & Gregory Ward (eds), 538–61. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torrego, Esperanza. 2009. Coordination. In New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax, Vol.1, Philip Baldi & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds), 443–87, Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Unceta Gómez, Luis. 2014. La politesse linguistique en latin: Bilan d’une étude en cours. Dictionnaire Historique et Encyclopédie Linguistique du Latin, Paris-Sorbonne. <[URL]> (15 March 2017)
Vanderveken, Daniel. 1988. Les Actes de discours. Liège: Mardaga.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watts, Richard J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weil, Henri. 1844. Question de grammaire générale: De l’ordre des mots dans les langues anciennes comparées aux langues modernes. Paris: de Crapelet (reprint Paris, Didier 1991; The Order of Words in the Ancient Languages Compared with the Modern Languages [Amsterdam Classics in Linguistics, 1800–1925, 14]; new ed. with an introduction by Aldo Scaglione. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1978).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Willi, Andreas. 2003. The Languages of Aristophanes. Aspects of Linguistic Variation in Classical Attic Greek. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Berger, Łukasz
2020. Greeting in Roman comedy: register and (im)politeness. Journal of Latin Linguistics 19:2  pp. 145 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue