Cover not available

In:Exploring Intensification: Synchronic, diachronic and cross-linguistic perspectives
Edited by Maria Napoli and Miriam Ravetto
[Studies in Language Companion Series 189] 2017
► pp. 147–170

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 7
Nulla sum, nulla sum: Tota, tota occidi

Repetition as a (rare) strategy of intensification in Latin

 | Università di Genova
Published online: 30 September 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.189.08fed
Abstract
Repetition of a linguistic form is a widespread strategy in the world’s languages to express a number of related functions, such as pluralization, distribution, collectivity and, crucially, intensification. This last function is the core meaning expressed by word repetition in Latin, a language where this copying process does not constitute a morphological rule, but rather an occasional mean to express intensification among the typical grammaticalized strategies (prefixes, the superlative suffix ‑issimus, and adverbs). This paper firstly provides a survey of forms and functions of repetition in Latin and suggests a distinction between degree and illocutionary intensification depending on their specific meaning, their scope, and the status of the source involved. Secondly, it contains a corpus-based study of word repetition based on the Plautine comedies, providing evidence about its uses and productivity effects across different lexical categories. The paper closes with a reassessment of the status of repetition as a pragmatic strategy of intensification in Latin, with a focus on Plautus, also offering some diachronic remarks.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Forms and functions of repetition in Latin
  • 3.A case study: Repetition as intensifying strategy in Plautus
    • 3.1Repetition of verbs
    • 3.2Nouns
    • 3.3Repetition of adverbs
    • 3.4Pragmatic markers
  • 4.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (47)
References
Abraham, Werner. 2005. Intensity and diminution triggered by reduplicating morphology: Janus-faced iconicity. In Studies on Reduplication, Bernard Hurch (ed.), 547–568. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Botha, Rudi P. 1988. Form and Meaning in Word Formation: A Study of Afrikaans Reduplication. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butler, H. E. 1966. Translation of Quintilian. The Institutio Oratoria , 4 Vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, Loeb Classical Library.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan & Kytö, Merja. 2000. Data in historical pragmatics: Spoken interaction (re)cast as writing. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1(2): 175–199. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cuzzolin, Pierluigi. 2011. Comparatives and superlatives. In New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax, Vol. 4: Complex Sentences, Grammaticalization, Typology, Philip Baldi & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds), 549–660. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cuzzolin, Pierluigi, Putzu, Ignazio & Ramat, Paolo. 2006. The Indo-European adverb in diachronic and typological perspective. Indogermanische Forschungen 111: 1–38.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cuzzolin, Pierluigi & Haverling, Gerd. 2009. Syntax, sociolinguistics, and literary genres. In New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax, Vol. 1: Syntax of the Sentence, Philip Baldi & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds), 19–64. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dell’Era, Antonio. 1970. La geminazione in Petronio. Giornale Italiano di Filologia 22: 22–31.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang & Merlini Barbaresi, Lavinia. 1994. Morphopragmatics. Diminutives and Intensifiers in Italian, German and Other Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Évrard-Gillis, Janine. 1976. La récurrence lexicale dans l’œuvre de Catulle. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fordyce, Christian James. 1961. Catullus. A Commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gil, David. 2005. From repetition to reduplication in Riau Indonesian. In Studies on Reduplication, Bernard Hurch (ed.), 31–64. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & the APiCS Consortium. 2013. Functions of reduplication. In The Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures, Susanne Michaelis, Philippe Maure, Martin Haspelmath & Magnus Huber (eds), 100–103. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hofmann, Johann Baptist & Szantyr, Anton. 1965. Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hofmann, Johann Baptist. 1985. La lingua d’uso latina, Italian version of Lateinische Umgangssprache, translated by L. Ricottilli. Bologna: Patron.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hurch, Bernard (ed.). 2005. Studies on Reduplication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hurch, Bernhard & Mattes, Veronika. 2009. Typology of reduplication: The Graz database. In Use of Databases in Cross-linguistic Studies, Martin Everaert, Simon Musgrave & Alexis Dimitriadis (eds), 301–328. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Inkelas, Sharon. 2014. Non-concatenative derivation: Reduplication. In The Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology, Rochelle Lieber & Pavel Stekauer (eds), 169–189. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Inkelas, Sharon & Zoll, Cheryl. 2005. Reduplication: Doubling in Morphology. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnston, Eva. 1905. Gemination in Terence. TAPhA 36: 44.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kallergi, Haritini. 2015. Reduplication at the Word Level: The Greek Facts in Typological Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiyomi, Setsuko. 1995. A new approach to reduplication: A semantic study of noun and verb reduplication in the Malayo-Polynesian languages. Linguistics 33: 1145–1167. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kouwenberg, Silvia. 1991. Reduplication in Berbice Dutch Creole. In Beiträge zum 6. Essener Kolloquium über Kontakt und Simplifikation, Norbert Boretzky, Werner Enninger & Thomas Stolz (eds), 75–102. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lindsay, Wallace Martin. 2010[1894]. The Latin Language: An Historical Account of Latin Sounds, Stems, and Flexions. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marouzeau, Jacques. 1946. Le redoublement expressif en latin. Latomus 5(1–2): 341–343.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Merone, Emilio. 1958. Precisazioni sulla funzione superlativa dell’aggettivo geminato in greco e in latino. Giornale Italiano di Filologia 11: 337–346.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Molinelli, Piera. 2008. Tra oralità e scrittura: Rogo nelle lettere private in latino. In Diachronica et synchronica. Studi in onore di Anna Giacalone Ramat, Romano Lazzeroni, Emanuele Banfi, Giuliano Bernini, Marina Chini & Giovanna Marotta (eds), 365–378. Pisa: ETS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moravscik, Edith. 1978. Reduplicative constructions. In Universals of Human Language, Vol. 3: Word structure, Joseph Greenberg (ed.), 297–334. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Napoli, Maria. 2014. Some remarks on intensification of nouns in Latin. Journal of Latin Linguistics 13(2): 243–266. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paradis, Carita. 2008. Configurations, construals and change: Expressions of degree . English Language and Linguistics 12(2): 317–343. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Piechnik, Iwona. 2015. Reduplicative syllables in Romance languages. Romanica Cracoviensia 15: 30–55.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poggi Salani, Teresa. 1971. Il tipo caffè caffè. Lingua nostra 32(3): 67–74.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rohlfs, Gerhard. 1968. Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti. Morfologia. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rönsch, Hermann. 1875. Itala und Vulgata, das Sprachidiom der urchristlichen Itala und der katholischen Vulgata unter Berücksichtigung der römischen Volkssprache. Marburg: Elwert.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rubino, Carl R. 2005. Reduplication: Form, function and distribution. In Studies on Reduplication, Bernard Hurch (ed.), 11–29. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1975. A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. In Language, Mind, and Knowledge, Keith Günderson (ed.), 344–369. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stolz, Thomas. 2004. A new mediterraneanism: Word iteration in an areal perspective. Mediterranean Language Review 15: 1–47.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Re: Duplication. Iconic vs. counter-iconic principles (and their areal correlates). In Europe and the Mediterranean as Linguistic Areas. Convergencies and Typological Perspectives [Studies in Language Companion Series 88], Paolo Ramat & Elisa Roma (eds), 317–350. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stolz, Thomas, Stroh, Cornelia & Urdze, Aina. 2011. Total Reduplication: The Areal Linguistics of a Potential Universal. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stotz, Peter. 1998. Handbuch zur lateinischen Sprache des Mittelalters. Vierter Band: Formenlehre, Syntax und Stilistik. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taavitasinen, Irma. 1995. Interjections in Early Modern English: From imitation of spoken to conventions of written language. In Historical Pragmatics. Pragmatic Developments in the History of English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 35], Andreas H. Jucker (ed.), 439–465. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traina, Alfonso. 1978. La ‘ripetizione’ in Catullo. Risultati e prospettive di un libro. Rivista di Filologia e di Istruzione Classica 106: 363–374.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wallace, Rex. 2011. The Latin alphabet and orthography. In A Companion to the Latin Language, James Clackson (ed.), 9–28. London: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1986. Italian reduplication: Cross-cultural pragmatics and illocutionary semantics. Linguistics 24: 287–315. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wills, Jeffrey. 1996. Repetition in Latin Poetry: Figures of Allusion. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
von Wölfflin, Eduard. 1882. Die Gemination im Lateinischen. Sitzungsberichte der k. Bayerischen Akademie 1882: 422–491.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Sojda, Sylwia
2022. The Intensifying Function of Reduplication in Contemporary Polish and Slovak. Journal of Linguistics/Jazykovedný casopis 73:2 ► pp. 161 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue