Cover not available

In:Exploring Intensification: Synchronic, diachronic and cross-linguistic perspectives
Edited by Maria Napoli and Miriam Ravetto
[Studies in Language Companion Series 189] 2017
► pp. 33–54

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 2
Intensification and focusing

The case of pure(ly) and mere(ly)

 | University of Mons
Published online: 30 September 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.189.03ghe
Abstract
Intensification or degree modification by means of adverbs and adjectives has been the object of linguistic study for many years, yet there is still a need for clear delineation of this functional category. This study focuses on the differences and similarities between the functional domains of intensification and focusing. The latter function has mainly been described for adverbs, with little attention to its adjectival realizations and to its relation to intensification. By means of corpus studies of pure, purely, mere and merely, it is shown that intensification and focusing are similar to some extent, both engaging in interpersonal modification (McGregor 1997), yet also distinct with intensification being semantically scalar, attitudinal and inherently subjective and focusing being only potentially pragmatically scalar, rhetorical and textually intersubjective.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Intensification and focusing: A preliminary demarcation
  • 3. Pure(ly) and mere(ly) : A case study of intensification and focusing
    • 3.1Descriptive modification
    • 3.2Intensification
    • 3.3Focusing
      • 3.3.1Exclusive focus
      • 3.3.2Particularizing focus
      • 3.3.3Inclusive focus
      • 3.3.4The development of focusing pure(ly) and mere(ly)
  • 4.Intensification vs. focusing
    • 4.1Scalarity
    • 4.2Subjectivity and intersubjectivity
    • 4.3Diachrony of intensification and focusing
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
  • Corpora
  • Appendix
References (38)
References
Adamson, Sylvia. 2000. A lovely little example: Word order options and category shift in the premodifying string. In Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English [Studies in Language Companion Series 53], Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds), 39–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Athanasiadou, Angeliki. 2007. On the subjectivity of intensifiers. Language Sciences 29: 554–565. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1967. Adjectives in English: Attribution and predication. Lingua 18: 1–34. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1972. Degree Words. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Breban, Tine & Davidse, Kristin. 2016. The history of very: The directionality of functional-structural change and (inter)subjectification. English Language and Linguistics 20: 1–29. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carlier, Anne & De Mulder, Walter. 2010. The emergence of the definite article: ille in competition with ipse in Late Latin. In Subjectification, Intersubjectification, and Grammaticalization, Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 241–275. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davidse, Kristin & Ghesquière, Lobke. 2016. Content-purport, content-substance and structure: Focusing mere and merely. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 48(1): 85–109. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger. 2006. Demonstratives, joint attention, and the emergence of grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 17: 463–489. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eckardt, Regine. 2012. The many careers of negative polarity items. In Grammaticalization and Language Change: New Reflections [Studies in Language Companion Series 130], Kristin Davidse, Tine Breban, Lieselotte Brems & Tanja Mortelmans (eds), 299–326. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gehweiler, Elke. 2008. The grammaticalization of the German adjectives lauter (and eitel). In Grammaticalization: Current Views and Issues [Studies in Language Companion Series 119], Ekaterini Stathi, Elke Gehweiler & Ekkehard König (eds), 297–322. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gehweiler, Elke. 2011. The Grammaticalization of Privative Adjectives: Present-day Uses and Diachronic Development. PhD dissertation, FU Berlin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ghesquière, Lobke. 2014. The Directionality of (Inter)subjectification in the English Noun Phrase: Pathways of Change. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ghesquière, Lobke, Brems, Lieselotte & Van de Velde, Freek. 2014. Intersubjectivity and intersubjectification: Typology and operationalization. In Intersubjectivity and Intersubjectification in Grammar and Discourse: Theoretical and Descriptive Advances [Benjamins Current Topics 65], Lieselotte Brems, Lobke Ghesquière & Freek Van de Velde (eds), 129–153. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hischberg, Julia. 1991. A Theory of Scalar Implicature. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher & McNally, Louise. 2005. Scalar structure, degree modification, and the semantics of gradable predicates. Language 81: 345–381. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard. 1991. The Meaning of Focus Particles: A Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leisi, Elizabeth. 1967[1961]. Der Wortinhalt. Seine Struktur im Deutschen und Englischen, 3. Durchgesehene und erweiterte Auflage. Heidelberg: Quelle & Meyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McGregor, William. 1997. Semiotic Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murray, James A.H., Brodly, Henry, Craigie, W. A. & Onions, C. T. 1993. The Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu. 1991. BUT, ONLY, JUST. Focusing Adverbial Change in Modern English 1500–1900. Helsinki: Société Neophilologique.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu & Rissanen, Matti. 2002. Fairly pretty or pretty fair? On the development and grammaticalization of English downtoners. Language Sciences 24: 359–380. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paradis, Carita. 1997. Degree Modifiers of Adjectives in Spoken British English. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paradis, Carita. 2000. Reinforcing Adjectives: A cognitive semantic perspective on grammaticalization. In Generative Theory and Corpus Studies: A Dialogue from 10 ICEHL, Ricardo Bermudez-Otero, David Denison, Richard M. Hogg & Chris B. Mccully (eds), 233–258. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paradis, Carita. 2001. Adjectives and boundedness. Cognitive Linguistics 12: 47–65. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Partington, Alan. 1998. Patterns and Meanings. Using Corpora for English Language Research and Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 2]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peters, Hans. 1994. Degree adverbs in Early Modern English. In Studies in Early Modern English, Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), 269–288. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stoffel, Cornelis. 1901. Intensives and Down-toners: A Study in English Adverbs. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tognini-Bonelli, Elena. 1993. Interpretative nodes in discourse: Actual and actually . In Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair, Mona Baker & Elena Tognini-Bonelli (eds), 193–212. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1982. From propositional to textual and expressive meanings: Some semantic-pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. In Perspectives on Historical Linguistics, Christian Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (eds), 245–271. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2006. The Semantic Development of Scalar Focus Modifiers. In The Handbook of the History of English, Ans Van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (eds), 335–359. Oxford: Blackwell. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tribushinina, Elena. 2008. Cognitive Reference Points: Semantics beyond the Prototypes in Adjectives of Space and Colour. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vandewinkel, Sigi & Davidse, Kristin. 2008. The interlocking paths of development to emphasizer adjective pure . Journal of Historical Pragmatics 9: 255–287. doi: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corpora
Kroch, Anthony & Taylor, AnnPPCME2 = Kroch, Anthony & Taylor, Ann. 2000. Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English, second edition. <[URL]>
Kroch, Anthony, Santorini, Beatrice & Delfs, LaurenPPCEME = Kroch, Anthony, Santorini, Beatrice & Delfs, Lauren. 2004. Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English. <[URL]>
Diller, Hans-Jürgen, De Smet, Hendrik & Tyrkko, JukkaCLMET3.0 = The Corpus of Late Modern English Texts, version 3.0. Diller, Hans-Jürgen, De Smet, Hendrik & Tyrkko, Jukka. 2011. A European database of descriptors of English electronic texts. The European English Messenger 19: 21–35.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
WB = Wordbanks Online corpus. <[URL]>
Cited by (12)

Cited by 12 other publications

Andrushenko, Olena
2025. A Multilingual Corpus for European Studies: Unlocking Focus and Intensification Patterns in the EU Acquis. Dialogica 1:1 ► pp. 12 ff. DOI logo
Cotgrove, Louis
2025. 137Novel methods of intensification in young people’s digitally-mediated communication. In Exploring digitally-mediated communication with corpora, ► pp. 137 ff. DOI logo
Verdelli, Martina
2025. How to express extreme quantity through Italian adverbial partially filled constructions. Folia Linguistica DOI logo
Troughton, Faye
2024. Projected meaning in English and French. Languages in Contrast 24:2 ► pp. 248 ff. DOI logo
Silvennoinen, Olli O.
2023. Not Just Contrastive: Constructions with Negated Restrictives in English. Journal of English Linguistics 51:4 ► pp. 346 ff. DOI logo
Bardenstein, Ruti & Mira Ariel
2022. The missing link between truth and intensification. Studies in Language 46:2 ► pp. 285 ff. DOI logo
KALTENBÖCK, GUNTHER & ELNORA TEN WOLDE
2022. AJust SoStory: on the recent emergence of the purpose subordinatorjust so. English Language and Linguistics 26:4 ► pp. 889 ff. DOI logo
Wolde, Elnora ten & Thomas Schwaiger
2022. Modification as a linguistic ‘relationship’: Ajust soproblem in Functional Discourse Grammar. Open Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 699 ff. DOI logo
Ghesquière, Lobke
2021. “A Good Deal of Intensity”: On the Development of Degree and Quantity Modifier Good. Journal of English Linguistics 49:2 ► pp. 159 ff. DOI logo
Lau, Seng-hian
2021. Negator turned intersubjective speech-act adverbial. Concentric. Studies in Linguistics 47:1 ► pp. 113 ff. DOI logo
Blanco-Suárez, Zeltia
2020. Mortal hurryandmortal fine: on the rise of intensifyingmortal. Studia Neophilologica 92:3 ► pp. 271 ff. DOI logo
ten Wolde, Elnora
2018. Premodification in evaluative of-binominal noun phrases. In Recent developments in Functional Discourse Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series, 205], ► pp. 169 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue