Cover not available

In:Exploring Intensification: Synchronic, diachronic and cross-linguistic perspectives
Edited by Maria Napoli and Miriam Ravetto
[Studies in Language Companion Series 189] 2017
► pp. 15–32

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 1
The comparative basis of intensification

 | Freie Universität Berlin | Universität Freiburg
Published online: 30 September 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.189.02kon
Abstract
This paper argues that the ubiquitous cognitive process of comparing and the resultant judgements of similarity and dissimilarity also underlie the semantic processes of intensification and grading to a large extent. This comparative basis is visible both in the formal properties of many intensifiers and in central aspects of their semantics: Intensifiers may overtly encode a comparison (e.g. crystal clear, royally, outstanding) and an emotional reaction to a comparison (surprisingly, frightfully), or they may imply a comparison with a covert standard in endocentric expansions of simple adjectival predications. In order to gain a new perspective on their meaning, the relations between intensifiers, on the one hand, and demonstratives, exclamatives and comparative constructions, on the other, are analyzed and a semantic typology of comparative constructions is outlined and discussed in relation to the central hypothesis.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Demonstratives and (interrogative) exclamatives as exophoric expressions of comparison
  • 3.Comparison and comparatives: Standard not given in external situation
    • Parameter D: number of dimensions: (n ≤ 1)
  • 4.Comparison as basis for intensification and intensifiers
  • 5.Subjectivity
  • 6.Measurement as comparison
  • 7.Summary and conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (24)
References
Alder, Ken. 2014. The Measure of all Things. Reprinted. New York NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Athanasiadou, Angeliki. 2007. On the subjectivity of intensifiers. Language Sciences 29: 554–565. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barsalou, Lawrence W. 2008. Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 59: 617–645. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bierwisch, Manfred. 1987. The semantics of gradation. In Dimensional Adjectives: Grammatical Structure and Conceptual Interpretation, Manfred Bierwisch & Ewald Lang (eds), 71–261. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1972. Degree Words. The Hague: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Cesare, Anna-Maria. 2001. Sulla semantica di alcuni tipi di intensificazione in italiano: ‘Davvero è molto interessante!’. Romanisches Jahrbuch 51: 87–107.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fuchs, Catherine. 2014. La comparaison et son expression en Français. Paris: Editions Ophrys.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Buchholz, Oda. 1998. Equative and similative constructions in the languages of Europe. In Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe, Johan van der Auwera (ed.), 277–334. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2017. Equative Constructions in world-wide perspective. InSimilative and Equative Constructions: A Crosslinguistic Perspective [Typological Studies in Language 117], Yvonne Treis & Martine Vanhove (eds), 9–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus. 1997. Deiktikon, Artikel, Nominalphrase: Zur Emergenz syntaktischer Struktur. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of English. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ito, Rika & Tagliamonte, Sali. 2003. Well weird, right dodgy, very strange, really cool: Layering and recycling in English intensifiers. Language in Society 32: 257–279. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher. 1999. Projecting the Adjective: The Syntax and semantics of Gradability and Comparison. New York, NY: Garland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher & McNally, Louise. 2005. Scale structure, degree modification, and the semantics of gradable predicate. Language 81(2): 345–381. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard. 2015. Manner deixis as a source of grammatical markers in Indo-European languages. In Perspectives on Historical Syntax [Studies in Language Companion Series 169], Carlotta Viti (ed), 35–60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Napoli, Maria. 2015. The syntax of excess: On the Italian (essere) troppo per construction. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 100(1): 51–84.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paradis, Carita. 1997. Degree Modifiers of Adjectives in Spoken British English [Lund Studies in English 92]. Lund: Lund University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Configurations, construals and change: Expressions of DEGREE. English Language and Linguistics 12(2): 317–343. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rett, Jessica. 2011. Exclamatives, degrees and speech acts, Linguistics and Philosophy 34(5): 411–442. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. The Semantics of Evaluativity. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stassen, Leon. 1985. Comparison and Universal Grammar. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Comparative Constructions. In The World Atlas of Language Structures, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), 490–493. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Pycia-Košćak, Paulina
2025. Engleski intenzifikator very i njegovi hrvatski, srpski i poljski prijevodni ekvivalenti (na primjeru „Winnie the Pooh” A. A. Milnea i hrvatskog, srpskog te dvaju poljskih prijevoda). Przekłady Literatur Słowiańskich ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Roels, Linde
2025. La evolución reciente del intensificador mazo (de) en el lenguaje juvenil madrileño. Revue Romane. Langue et littérature. International Journal of Romance Languages and Literatures DOI logo
Hendrikx, Isa, Kristel Van Goethem & Natacha Buntinx
2024. Intensification strength in speech: language-specific preferences and differences between native and learner language. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 13 DOI logo
Van Olmen, Daniel
2024. Adjectival intensification in West Germanic. Studies in Language 48:2 ► pp. 436 ff. DOI logo
Melissaropoulou, Dimitra & Christos Papanagiotou
2021. Language variation and change in the formation of Greek superlative constructions. Dialectologia et Geolinguistica 29:1 ► pp. 55 ff. DOI logo
Van Goethem, Kristel & Isa Hendrikx
2021. Intensifying constructions in second language acquisition. In Constructions in Contact 2 [Constructional Approaches to Language, 30], ► pp. 375 ff. DOI logo
Blanco-Suárez, Zeltia
2020. Mortal hurryandmortal fine: on the rise of intensifyingmortal. Studia Neophilologica 92:3 ► pp. 271 ff. DOI logo
Schweinberger, Martin
2020. Analyzing change in the American English amplifier system in the fiction genre. In Corpora and the changing society [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 96], ► pp. 223 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue