Cover not available

In:Space in Diachrony
Edited by Silvia Luraghi, Tatiana Nikitina and Chiara Zanchi
[Studies in Language Companion Series 188] 2017
► pp. 329–346

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Source-Location ambiguity and incipient decline in the recent evolution of the English directional particle away

 | Aix Marseille University / LERMA Research Centre
Published online: 14 August 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.188.12lew
This chapter reports on a corpus-based investigation of the evolution of spatial away over the Modern English period in the light of recent work on the expression of motion events. Three observations are made: firstly, a directional-locative polysemy develops, secondly productivity seems to stagnate, and thirdly, for a range of verbs, directional V-away seems to be being gradually replaced by V-off. The likely mechanisms behind these changes are discussed, and it is suggested that away may be an atypical directional particle in decline, possibly in the context of a reorganization or regularization of English directional particles.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2. Away in present-day English
  • 3.The corpus and the data on away
  • 4.Recent evolution of away
    • 4.1Origins and trends
    • 4.2The development of locative away
  • 5.Potential decline of directional away
    • 5.1Idiomatization / lexicalization of V-away
    • 5.2Decline of V-away and autonomous away
    • 5.3 Away and off
  • 6.Possible motivations for an away > off shift
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (29)
References
Akimoto, Minoji. 2006. On the decline of ‘after’ and ‘forth’ in verb phrases. In Syntax, Style and Grammatical Norms: English from 1500–2000, Christiane Dalton-Puffer, Dieter Kastovsky & Nikolaus Ritt (eds), 11–31. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beal, Joan C.. 2004. English in Modern Times: 1700–1945. London: Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bourdin, Philippe. 1997. On goal-bias across languages: modal, configurational and orientational parameters. In Proceedings of LP’96, Bohumil Palek (ed), 185–218. Prague: Charles University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J.. 1988. The Development of English Aspectual Systems. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L.. 2006. From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language 82(4): 711–733.  Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Campbell, Alistair. 1959. Old English Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Claridge, Claudia. 2000. Multi-word Verbs in Early Modern English: A Corpus-based Study. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis. 2006. Encoding the distinction between location, source and direction: a typological study. In Space in Languages: Linguistic Systems and Cognitive Categories [Typological Studies in Language 66], Maya Hickmann & Stéphane Robert (eds), 19–28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William, Barðdal, Johanna, Hollmann, Willem B., Sotirova, Violeta & Taoka, Chiaki. 2010. Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex events. In Contrastive Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language 10], Hans C. Boas (ed), 201–236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Curzan, Anne. 2012. Periodization in the history of the English language. In English Historical Linguistics, Vol. 2, Laurel J. Brinton & Alexander Bergs (eds), 1233–1256. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 2001. Inflationary effects in language and elsewhere. In Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure [Typological Studies in Language 45], Joan Bybee & Paul Hopper (eds), 471–480. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fanego, Teresa. 2012. Motion events in English. The emergence and diachrony of manner salience from Old English to Late Modern English. Folia Linguistica Historica 33: 29–85.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan T. & Anatol Stefanowitsch. 2004. Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9(1): 97–129.  Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grinevald, Colette. 2011. On constructing a working typology of the expression of path. Faits de Langue. Les Cahiers 3: 43–70.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1999. Why is grammaticalization irreversible? Linguistics 37(6): 1043–1068.  Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hiltunen, Risto. 1983. The Decline of the Prefixes and the Beginnings of the English Phrasal Verb. Turku: Turun Yliopisto.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. On phrasal verbs in Early Modern English. Notes on lexis and style. In Studies in Early Modern English, Dieter Kastovsky (ed), 129–140. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hovmark, Henrik. 2013. Danish directional adverbs: Ways of profiling a motion event. In The Construal of Spatial Meaning: Windows into Conceptual Space, Carita Paradis, Jean Hudson & Ulf Magnusson (eds), 169–193. Oxford: OUP.  Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Imbert, Caroline, Grinevald, Colette & Söres, Anna. 2011. Pour une catégorie de "satellite" de Trajectoire dans une approche fonctionnelle-typologique. Faits de Langue . Les Cahiers 3: 99–116.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 2002. English particle constructions, the lexicon, and the autonomy of syntax. In Verb-Particle Explorations, Nicole Dehé, Ray Jackendoff, Andrew McIntyre & Silke Urban (eds), 67–94. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.  Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia. 2014. Plotting diachronic semantic maps: The role of metaphor. In Perspectives on Semantic Roles [Typological Studies in Language 106], Silvia Luraghi & Heiko Narrog (eds), 99–150. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
OED Online. 2016. Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: OUP. 〈[URL]〉 (13 February 2017).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Papafragou, Anna. 2010. Source–goal asymmetries in motion representation: Implications for language production and comprehension. Cognitive Science 34(6): 1064–1092.  Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Penzl, Herbert. 1994. Periodisation in language history: Early Modern English and the other periods. In Studies in Early Modern English, Dieter Kastovsky (ed), 261–268. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poutsma, Hendrik. 1926. A Grammar of Late Modern English, Part II, Section II. Groningen: Noordhoff.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rodriguez Puente, Paula. 2013. The Development of Phrasal Verbs in British English from 1650 to 1900. A Corpus-based Study. PhD dissertation, University of Santiago de Compostela.
Stefanowitsch Anatol & Rohde, Ada. 2004. The goal bias in the encoding of motion events. In Studies in Linguistic Motivation Günter Radden & Klaus-Uwe Panther (eds), 249–268. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Timothy Shopen (ed), 57–149. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue