In:Pragmatic Markers, Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: New perspectives
Edited by Chiara Fedriani and Andrea Sansó
[Studies in Language Companion Series 186] 2017
► pp. 203–228
Chapter 7Italian non-canonical negations as modal particles
Information state, polarity and mirativity
Published online: 13 November 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.186.08squ
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.186.08squ
Abstract
This chapter will focus on the role of information state as a major factor in the development of modal particles derived from negative minimizers. By capitalizing on previous research on Romance non-canonical negations (see especially Schwenter 2003, 2005, 2006), the analysis will describe the special discursive function of the Italian negative operator mica (etym. ‘crumb’) in direct questions, where the textual dynamics ‘given’ vs. ‘new’ interacts with the speaker’s mirative reactions. The occurrence of distinct regional patterns in the use of mica in direct questions indicates different combinations of polarity with the mirative role of the speaker, who, apart from managing information flow, also reacts to unexpected information by matching previous knowledge with new information acquired in discourse.
Keywords: direct questions, negation, given/new, mirativity
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Romance non-canonical negations as discourse operators
- 3.The interplay of discourse givenness and hearer’s knowledge
- 4.Italian mica : From discourse-old to discourse-new?
- 5.Italian mica in direct questions: mica 1 and mica 2
- 6. mica 1 vs. mica 2 : Polarity and mirativity
- 7.Discourse-new but speaker-old in questions?
- 8.Conclusion
Notes References
References (53)
Abraham, Werner. 2017. Discourse marker = discourse particle = thetical = modal particle? A futile comparison. In Discourse Particles – Formal Approaches to their Syntax and Semantics, Josef Bayer & Volker Struckmeier (eds), 241–280. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. In press. Modalpartikel und Mirativeffekte. In MISU-Sammelband, Shin Tanaka & Elisabeth Leiss (eds).
2014. The grammar of knowledge: A cross-linguistic view of evidentials and the expression of information source. In The Grammar of Knowledge. A Cross-linguistic Typology, Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M. W. Dixon (eds), 1–50. Oxford: OUP.
Bernini, Giuliano & Ramat, Paolo. 1996. Negative Sentences in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bianchi, Valentina, Bocci, Giuliano & Cruschina, Silvio. 2015. Focus fronting and its implicatures. In Romance Languages und Linguistic Theory 2013: Selected papers from Going Romance, Amsterdam 2013 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 1], Enoch Aboh, Aafke Hulk, Jeannette Schaeffer & Petra Sleeman (eds), 1–19. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Birner, Betty J. 2006. Semantic and pragmatic contributions to information status. In Explorations in the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface, Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen & Ken Turner (eds). Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 38: 14–32.
Chafe, William L. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, subject, topic, and point of view. In Subject and Topic, Charles Li (ed.), 27–55. New York NY: Academic Press.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1976[1991].
Mica: note di sintassi e pragmatica. In Teoria linguistica e sintassi italiana, Guglielmo Cinque (ed.), 311–323. Bologna: il Mulino.
Coniglio, Marco. 2008. Modal particles in Italian. Working papers in Linguistics University of Venice 18: 91–129.
Degand, Liesbeth, Cornillie, Bert & Pietrandrea, Paola. 2013. Discourse Markers and Modal Particles. Categorization and Description [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 234]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
DeLancey, Scott. 1997. Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology 1: 33–52.
Detges, Ulrich & Waltereit, Richard. 2009. Diachronic pathways and pragmatic strategies: different types of pragmatic particles from a diachronic point of view. In Current Trends in Diachronic Semantics and Pragmatics, Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen & Jacqueline Visconti (eds), 43–61. Bingley: Emerald.
Diewald, Gabriele. 2006. Discourse particles and modal particles as grammatical elements. In Approaches to Discourse Particles [Studies in Pragmatics 1], Kerstin Fischer (ed.), 403–425. Oxford: Elsevier.
Dryer, Matthew S. 1996. Focus, pragmatic presupposition, and activated propositions. Journal of Pragmatics 26: 475–523.
Escandell Vidal, María Vitoria. 2010. Futuro y evidencialidad. Anuario de Lingüística Hispánica 26: 9–34.
Espinal, María Teresa. 1993. The interpretation of no-pas in Catalan. Journal of Pragmatics 19: 353–369.
. 2002.
La negació
. In Gramàtica del català contemporani, Joan Solà, Maria-Rosa Lloret, Joan Mascaró, Manuel Pérez Saldanya (eds), 2727–2797. Barcelona: Empúries.
Fedriani, Chiara & Miola, Emanuele. 2014. French déjà, Piedmontese Regional Italian già: A case of contact-induced pragmaticalization. In Discourse and Pragmatic Markers from Latin to the Romance languages, Chiara Ghezzi & Piera Molinelli (eds), 166–189. Oxford: OUP.
Ghezzi, Chiara. 2014. The development of discourse and pragmatic markers. In Discourse and Pragmatic Markers from Latin to the Romance Languages, Chiara Ghezzi & Piera Molinelli (eds), 10–26. Oxford: OUP.
Hansen Mosegaard, Maj-Britt. 2009. The grammaticalization of negative reinforcers in Old and Middle French: A discourse-functional approach. In Current Trends in Diachronic Semantics and Pragmatics, Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen & Jacqueline Visconti (eds), 227–251. Bingley: Emerald.
Hansen Mosegaard, Maj-Britt & Visconti, Jacqueline. 2009. On the diachrony of reinforced negation in French and Italian. In Grammaticalization and pragmatics. Facts, Approaches, Theoretical Issues, Corinne Rossari, Claudia Ricci & Adriana Spiridon (eds), 137–171. Bingley: Emerald.
. 2012. The evolution of negation in French and Italian: Similarities and differences. Folia Linguistica 46: 453–482.
Hill, Nathan W. 2012. Mirativity does not exist: ḥdug in “Lhasa” Tibetan and other suspects. Linguistic Typology 16: 389–433.
Ladd, D. Robert. 1981. A first look at the semantics and pragmatics of negative questions and tag questions. In Papers from the 17th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 164–171. Chicago IL: University of Chicago.
Molinelli, Piera. 1988. Fenomeni della negazione dal latino all’italiano. Florence: La Nuova Italia.
Nocentini, Alberto. 2003. La cosiddetta negazione espletiva in italiano. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 88: 72–90.
Olbertz, Hella. 2009. Mirativity and exclamatives in functional discourse grammar: Evidence from Spanish. Web Papers in Functional Discourse Grammar 82: 66–82. Amsterdam: Functional Grammar Foundation.
Parry, Mair. 2013. Negation in the history of Italo-Romance. In The History of Negation in the Languages of Europe and the Mediterranean, Vol. 1: Case Studies, David Willis, Christopher Lucas & Anne Breitbarth (eds), 77–118. Oxford: OUP.
Pescarini, Diego. 2009. Presuppositional negation and the {addressee}. Padua Working Papers in Linguistics 3: 22–29.
Pescarini, Diego & Penello, Nicoletta. 2008. Osservazioni su mica in italiano e alcuni dialetti veneti. Quaderni di Lavoro ASIt 8.
. 2012. L’avverbio mica tra widening semantico e restrizioni sintattiche. In Linguaggio e cervello / Semantica, Atti del XLII Congresso internazionale di studi della Società di Linguistica italiana (SLI), Pisa (25–27 September 2008), Pier Marco Bertinetto, Valentina Bambini & Irene Ricci (eds). Rome: Bulzoni.
Plungian, Vladimir A. 2010. Types of verbal evidentiality marking: An overview. In Linguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages, Gabriele Diewald & Elena Smirnova (eds), 15–58. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Prince, Ellen F. 1981. Toward a taxonomy of Given-New information. In Radical Pragmatics, Peter Cole (ed.), 223–255. New York NY: Academic Press.
1992. The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness and information-status. In Discourse Description: Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fund-raising Text [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 16], William S. Mann & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 295–325. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Reese, Brian J. 2006. The meaning and use of negative polar interrogatives. In Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 6, Olivier Bonami & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr (eds), 331–354. <[URL]>
Romero, Maribel & Han, Chung – hye. 2004. On negative yes/no questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 27: 609–658.
Schwenter, Scott A. 2003.
No and Tampoco: A pragmatic distinction in Spanish negation. Journal of Pragmatics 35: 999–1030.
2006. Fine-tuning Jespersen’s cycle. In Drawing the Boundaries of Meaning. Neo-Gricean Studies in Pragmatics and Semantics in Honor of Laurence R. Horn [Studies in Language Companion Series 80], Betty J. Birner & Gregory Ward (eds), 327–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Squartini, Mario. 2014. The pragmaticalization of ‘already’ in Romance: From discourse grammar to illocution. In Discourse and Pragmatic Markers from Latin to the Romance languages, Chiara Ghezzi & Piera Molinelli (eds), 190–210. Oxford: OUP.
Visconti, Jacqueline. 2009. From ‘textual’ to ‘interpersonal’: On the diachrony of the Italian particle mica
. Journal of Pragmatics 41: 937–950.
Waltereit, Richard. 2001. Modal particles and their functional equivalents: A speech-act-theoretical approach. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 1391–1417.
Zanuttini, Raffaella. 1997. Negation and Clausal Structure. A Comparative Study of Romance Languages. Oxford: OUP.
Cited by (57)
Cited by 57 other publications
Staszkiewicz, Bruno, Lori Czerwionka & Valentina Concu
Guerini, Federica
Larrivée, Pierre & Alda Mari
Beaver, David & Kristin Denlinger
Bohn, Manuel, Josep Call & Christoph J. Völter
Breitbarth, Anne
Cerruti, Massimo
2020. From dialect to standard: Facilitating and constraining factors. In Intermediate language varieties [Studies in Language Variation, 24], ► pp. 125 ff.
Christensen, Ken Ramshøj
de Swart, Henriëtte
Dwivedi, Veena D.
Favaro, Marco
2020. From focus marking to illocutionary modification. In Information-structural perspectives on discourse particles [Studies in Language Companion Series, 213], ► pp. 111 ff.
Favaro, Marco
Fleisher, Nicholas
Francis, Naomi & Sabine Iatridou
Giannakidou, Anastasia
Gianollo, Chiara
Gianollo, Chiara
Grodzinsky, Yosef, Virginia Jaichenco, Isabelle Deschamps, María Elina Sánchez, Martín Fuchs, Peter Pieperhoff, Yonatan Loewenstein & Katrin Amunts
Hochmann, Jean-Rémy
Kaup, Barbara & Carolin Dudschig
Mayr, Clemens
Modicom, Pierre-Yves & Olivier Duplâtre
2020. Introduction. In Information-structural perspectives on discourse particles [Studies in Language Companion Series, 213], ► pp. 1 ff.
Muller, Hanna & Colin Phillips
Papeo, Liuba & Manuel de Vega
Pearce, Elizabeth
Poletto, Cecilia
Prieto, Pilar & M. Teresa Espinal
Quer, Josep
Remberger, Eva-Maria
2020. Information-structural properties of is that
clauses. In Information-structural perspectives on discourse particles [Studies in Language Companion Series, 213], ► pp. 47 ff.
Romero, Maribel
Sánchez, Liliana & Jennifer Austin
Thornton, Rosalind
Tortora, Christina & Frances Blanchette
Tubau, Susagna
van der Auwera, Johan & Olga Krasnoukhova
Wallage, Phillip
Delfitto, Denis, Chiara Melloni & Maria Vender
2019. The (en)rich(ed) meaning of expletive negation. Evolutionary Linguistic Theory 1:1 ► pp. 57 ff.
Larrivée, Pierre
2019. Historical pragmatics, explicit activation and wh in
situ in French. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 15 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 15], ► pp. 113 ff.
Larrivée, Pierre
Larrivée, Pierre
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
