Cover not available

In:Imperatives and Directive Strategies
Edited by Daniël Van Olmen and Simone Heinold
[Studies in Language Companion Series 184] 2017
► pp. 291–318

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Crossing the categorial divide

Imperative and interjection conversions in Romance

 | CELGA-ILTEC
Published online: 11 April 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.184.10swe
Imperatives and interjections are distinct categories differing in both form and function. As the prototypical directive verb form, an imperative exhibits both typical as well as unique morphosyntactic properties of its class. Interjections are discourse markers anchored in pragmatics and peripheral to phrasal grammar. However, imperatives and interjections also exhibit a number of similar properties which underlie instances of transcategorization between the two. With examples from a variety of Romance languages, I explore the shared features and processes leading to transcategorization, touch upon the language origins of imperatives and interjections and refer to Heine’s (1993) overlap model to argue that a combination of shared features and frequency constitute the principle triggers for these processes.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Imperatives
    • 2.1In general
    • 2.2Romance morphology
  • 3.Interjections
  • 4.The intersection of imperatives and interjections
  • 5.Transcategorization between imperatives and interjections in Romance
    • 5.1Imperatives to interjections
    • 5.2Interjections to imperatives
  • 6.Diachronic origins of interjections and imperatives
    • 6.1Language evolution and acquisition
    • 6.2Overlap model
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Abbreviations
  • Notes
  • References
References (54)
References
Ameka, Felix K. 1992. Interjections: The universal yet neglected part of speech. Journal of Pragmatics 18(2–3): 101–118. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Interjections. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Keith Brown (ed.), 743–746. Oxford: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arbib, Michael. 2005. The mirror system hypothesis: How did protolanguage evolve? In Language Origins. Perspectives on Evolution, Maggie Tallerman (ed), 21–47. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Austin, John L. 1962. How to do Things with Words. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bates, Elizabeth, Camaioni, Luigia & Voltera, Virginia. 1976. The acquisition of performatives prior to speech. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development 21(3): 205–226.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane. 2002. Relevance and Linguistic Meaning. The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bonami, Olivier & Boyé, Gilles. 2002. Suppletion and dependency in inflectional morphology. In The Proceedings of the 8th International HPSG Conference, Franck van Eynde, Lars Helland & Dorothee Beermann (eds), 51–70. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Botha, Rudolf & Knight, Chris. 2009. The Prehistory of Language. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen. 1987. Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boyé, Glles & Cabredo Hofherr, Patricia. 2006. The structure of allomorpy in Spanish verbal inflection. In Cuadernos de Lingüística del Instituto Universitario Ortega y Gassett 13: 9–24.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buridant, Claude. 2000. Grammaire nouvelle de l’ancien français. Paris: Sedes.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 1985. Morphology. The Relation between Form and Meaning [Typological Studies in Language 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan & Hopper, Paul. 2001. Introduction to frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. In Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure [Typological Studies in Language 45], Joan Bybee & Paul Hopper (eds), 1–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cochet, Hélène & Vauclair, Jacques. 2010. Gestural communication in human children: Ontogenetic perspective in favour of the gestural hypothesis of language origin. In The Evolution of Language, Andrew Smith, Marieke Schouwstra, Bart de Boer & Kenny Smith (eds), 383–384. Singapore: World Scientific. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crystal, David. 1995. The Cambridge Encyclopaedia of Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Floričić, Franck. 2007. Les impératifs italiens entre verbe et interjections. Écho des études romanes 3(1–2): 71–92.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Floričić, Franck & Molinu, Lucia. 2012. Romance monosyllabic imperatives and markedness. In Monosyllables. From Phonology to Typology, Thomas Stolz, Nicole Nau & Cornelia Stroh (eds), 149–172. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fortuin, Egbert & Boogaart, Ronny. 2009. Imperative as conditional: From constructional to compositional semantics. Cognitive Linguistics 20(4): 641–673. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fouché, Pierre. 1924. Phonétique historique du Roussillonnais. Toulouse: Edouard Privat.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 1990. An approach to discourse markers. Journal of Pragmatics 14(3): 383–395. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, James. 1998. Spanish imperatives: Syntax meets morphology. Journal of Linguistics 34(1): 27–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 1993. Auxiliaries. Cognitive Forces and Grammaticalization. Oxford:OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Grammaticalization. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), 575–601. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul & Traugott, Elizabeth. 2003. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hurford, James R. 2007. The Origins of Meaning. Oxford. OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jeżek, Elisabetta & Ramat, Paolo. 2009. On parts-of-speech transcategorization. Folia Linguistica 43(2): 391–416. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lamiroy, Béatrice & Swiggers, Pierre. 1993. Patterns of mobilization: A study of interaction signals in Romance. In Conceptualizations and Mental Processing in Language, Richard A. Geiger & Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (eds), 649–678. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lœvenbruck, Hélène, Dohen, Marion & Vilain, Coriandre. 2008. From gestural pointing to vocal pointing in the brain. Revue française de linguistique appliquée 13(2): 23–33.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics, Vol. II. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maiden, Martin. 2007. On the morphology of Italo-Romance imperatives. The Italianist 27(special supplement): 148–164.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maiden, Martin & Robustelli, Cecilia. 2007. A Reference Grammar of Modern Italian. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mauri, Catarina & Sansò, Andrea. 2011. How directive constructions emerge: Grammaticalization, constructionalization, cooptation. Journal of Pragmatics 43(14): 3489–3521. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meltzoff, Andrew N. & Brooks, Rechele. 2009. Social cognition and language: The role of gaze following in early word learning. In Infant Pathways to Language. Methods, Models and Research Directions, John Colombo, Peggy McCardle & Lisa Freund (eds), 169–194. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Montes, Rosa G. 1999. The development of discourse markers in Spanish: Interjections. Journal of Pragmatics 31(10): 1289–1319. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norde, Muriel. 2009. Degrammaticalization. Oxford. OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norrick, Neal R. 2009. Interjections as pragmatic markers. Journal of Pragmatics 41(5): 866–891. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nübling, Damaris. 2004. Die prototypische Interjektion: Ein Definitionsvorschlag. Zeitschrift für Semiotik. 26(1–2): 11–46.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nyrop, Kristoffer. 1903. Grammaire historique de la langue française, Tome II. Copenhagen: Gyldendalske Boghandel Nordisk Forlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Progovac, Ljiljiana. 2009. Layering of grammar: Vestiges of protosyntax in present-day languages. In Language Complexity as an Evolving Variable, Geoffrey Sampson, David Gil & Peter Trudgill (eds), 203–212. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ronjat, Jules. 1937. Grammaire historique des parlers provençaux modernes, Tome 4. Montpellier: Société des langues romanes.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1965. What is a speech act? In Philosophy in America, Maurice Black (ed.), 221–239. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1975. A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. In Language, Mind and Knowledge, Keith Gunderson (ed.), 344–369. Minneapolis MN: University of Minneapolis Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John R. & Vanderveken, Daniel. 1985. Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory. 2001. Inflectional Morphology. A Theory of Paradigm Structure. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swearingen, Andrew. 2011. Romance Imperatives: Syncretism, Irregularity, Autonomy. PhD dissertation, University of Oxford.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Świątkowska, Marcela. 2006. L’interjection: Entre deixis et anaphore. Langages 161: 47–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tesnière, Lucien. 1936. Sur la classification des interjections. In Mélanges dédiés à la mémoire de Prokop M. Haškovec par ses amis et ses élèves, Ant Šesták & Ant Dokoupil (eds), 343–410. Brno: Globus.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trask, Robert L. 1993. A Dictionary of Grammatical Terms in Linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Veselinova, Ljuba N. 2006. Suppletion in Verb Paradigms. Bits and Pieces of the Puzzle [Typological Studies in Language 67]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1996. Semantics. Primes and Universals. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue