In:Imperatives and Directive Strategies
Edited by Daniël Van Olmen and Simone Heinold
[Studies in Language Companion Series 184] 2017
► pp. 159–180
“You’re just workin’ for yourself”
Directive strategies in yoga instructional discourse
Published online: 11 April 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.184.05bro
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.184.05bro
In this paper, I examine directives uttered by yoga teachers to their students during classes, with special attention to their frequency of use and their degree of modification. Yoga instructional discourse is shown to be characterized by a wide range of directives, from bald imperatives to modified forms, including indirect directives. I demonstrate that these different types of directive have a characteristic pattern of distribution within the yoga instructional practice context. Indirect directives include present and future descriptions of actions rather than instructions to perform them and various kinds of modifications, including phrases that echo yoga ideology.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Categories of directives in instruction
- 3.Yoga philosophy and yoga instruction
- 4.Data
- 5.Directives in yoga instructional discourse
- 5.1Bald imperatives
- 5.2Modified imperatives
- 5.3Incorporated imperatives
- 5.4Elided verbs
- 5.5Combinations
- 6.Indirect versus direct directives in yoga instructional discourse
- 7.Discussion: Embodied practice
- 8.Conclusion
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (33)
Aarts, Flor. 1989. Imperatives in English: Semantics and pragmatics. Studia Linguistica 43(2): 119–134.
Brody, Jill. 1991. Indirection in the negotiation of self in everyday Tojolab’al women’s conversation. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 1(1):78–96.
Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: CUP.
Clemen, Gudrun. 1997. The concept of hedging: Origins, approaches and definitions. In Hedging and Discourse. Approaches to the Analysis of a Pragmatic Phenomenon, Raija Markkanen & Hartmut Schröder (eds), 235–248. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Cooren, François. 2010. Action and Agency in Dialogue [Dialogue Studies 6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Delin, Judy. 1998. Facework and instructor goals in the step aerobics workout. In Language at Work, Susan Hunston (ed.), 52–71. Clevedon: British Association for Applied Linguistics in association with Multilingual Matters.
. 2001. Keeping in step: Task structure, discourse structure and utterance interpretation in the step aerobics workout. Discourse Processes 31(1): 61–89.
Dufour, Nicole M. 2003. Dialogic Dogs and Phatic Felines: Speaking to and through Our Pets. MA dissertation, Louisiana State University.
Ervin-Tripp, Susan. 1976. Is Sybil there? The structure of some American English directives. Language in Society 5(1): 25–66.
Falgout, Suzanne & Levin, Paula. 1992. Transforming knowledge: Western schooling in the Pacific. Anthropology and Education Quarterly 23(1): 3–9.
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis. An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York NY: Harper Colophon Books.
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness. 1990. He-Said-She-Said: Talk as Social Organization among Black Children. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.
Irvine, Judith. 1979. Formality and informality in communicative events. American Anthropologist 81(4): 733–790.
Jakobson, Roman. 1960. Closing statements: Linguistics and poetics. In Style in Language, Thomas Sebeok (ed.), 350–377. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Kiesling, Scott F. 2001. “Now I gotta watch what I say”: Shifting constructions of masculinity in discourse. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 11(2): 250–273.
Kohn, Tamara. 2001. Don’t talk–blend: Ideas about body and communication in aikido practice. In An Anthropology of Indirect Communication, Joy Dendry & Conrad W. Watson (eds), 163–176. London: Routledge.
Lave, Jean & Wegner, Etienne. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: CUP.
Richardson-Klavehn, Alan & Bjork, Robert A. 1988. Measures of memory. Annual Review of Psychology 39: 475–543.
Searle, John. 1975. A taxonomy of illocutionary acts, In Language, Mind, and Knowledge, Keith Gunderson (ed.), 344–369. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Silverstein, Michael. 2001. The limits of awareness. In Linguistic Anthropology. A Reader, Alessandro Duranti (ed.), 382–401. Oxford: Blackwell.
Tannen, Debora. 2003. Power maneuvers or connection maneuvers? Ventriloquizing in family interaction. In Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics. Linguistics, Language and the Real World. Discourse and Beyond, Deborah Tannen & James E. Alatis (eds), 50–62. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
