Cover not available

In:Imperatives and Directive Strategies
Edited by Daniël Van Olmen and Simone Heinold
[Studies in Language Companion Series 184] 2017
► pp. 53–78

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Imperatives and evidentiality in Innu

 | Université du Québec à Montréal
Published online: 11 April 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.184.02bar
Languages with a rich morphology such as Innu, an aboriginal language of Canada, which clearly mark phenomena that are less obvious in analytic languages, have contributed significantly to our understanding of language in several domains. Innu is of particular interest for the typology of imperatives because the imperative in this language is more than just a grammatical mood: it has three different paradigms of specialized imperative verbal forms with specific semantic overtones. The so-called indirect imperative paradigm is the focus of the present chapter. It is a type of absential imperative, where the action is expected to be performed in the absence of the speaker. We argue that it actually expresses evidentiality. It is a type of imperative which is not very well-known: it seems to be rare cross-linguistically and difficult to demonstrate. The analysis of the Innu imperative here sheds new light on the issue.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Key characteristics of the inflectional verb system of Innu
    • 2.1Three sets of conjugations
    • 2.2Moods and modalities
    • 2.3Evidentiality
  • 3.Directive strategies
    • 3.1Non-specialized forms
      • 3.1.1Tshe + conjunct
      • 3.1.2Verbless sentences
    • 3.2Specialized forms
  • 4.An evidential imperative
    • 4.1Previous analyses of imperative 3
    • 4.2Our analysis of imperative 3
    • 4.3Argument in favor of our analysis
      • 4.3.1Evidentiality in imperatives in general
      • 4.3.2Evidentiality in imperatives in Innu
      • 4.3.3Is the imperative a mood or a speech act?
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Abbreviations
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (30)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2006. Evidentiality. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Imperatives and Commands. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anderson, Lloyd B. 1986. Evidentials, paths of change and mental maps: Typologically regular asymmetries. In Evidentiality. The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds), 273–312. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baraby, Anne-Marie. 1985. Aspects de la morphologie des flexions verbales du montagnais de Sheshatshit. MA dissertation, Université de Montréal.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Guide de conjugaisons en langue innue. Sept-Îles: Institut culturel et éducatif Montagnais.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Un impératif indirect en innu, Paper presented at the 41st Algonquian Conference , Montréal, October.
Baraby, Anne-Marie & Junker, Marie-Odile. 2014. Conjugaisons des verbes innus. <[URL]> (17 March 2015).
Birjulin, Leonid A. & Xrakovskij, Victor S. 2001. Imperative sentences: Theoretical problems. In Xrakovskij (ed.), 3–54.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhat, D. N. S. 1999. The Prominence of Tense, Aspect and Mood [Studies in Language Companion Series 49]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chung, Sandra & Timberlake, Alan. 1985. Tense, aspect and mood. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. III, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 203–258. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clarke, Sandra. 1982. North West River (Sheshatshit) Montagnais. A Grammatical Sketch. Ottawa: National Museum of Man.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dolinina, Inga B. 2001. The imperative paradigm: Meaning and forms. In Xrakovskij (ed.), 501–509.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drapeau, Lynn. 1984. Le traitement de l’information chez les Montagnais. Recherches amérindiennes au Québec 1(4): 24–35.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1986. Entre le rêve et la réalité: Le mode subjectif en montagnais. In Actes dudix-septième Congrès des Algonquinistes, William Cowan (ed.), 101–120. Ottawa: Carleton University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. The epistemic dimension of modality in Innu-Montagnais. Paper presented at the 37th Algonquian Conference , Gatineau, October.
. 2014. Grammaire de la langue innue. Quebec: Presses de l’Université du Québec.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drapeau, Lynn & Lambert-Brétière, Renée. 2012. Clause chaining in Innu. Paper presented at the 44th Algonquian Conference , Chicago, October.
Evans, Nicholas. 2007. Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness. Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 366–431. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ford, Alan & Bacon, Joséphine. 1978. Cours programmé d’une langue. Langue montagnaise. Montreal: Université de Montréal.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gruzdeva, Ekaterina. 2001. Imperative sentences in Nivkh. In Victor S. Xrakovskij (ed.), 59–77.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krejnovič, Eruxim A. 1979. Nivikhskij jazyk (The Nivkh language). In Jazyki Azii i Afriki: III (Languages of Asia and Africa), 295–329. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacKenzie, Marguerite & Clarke, Sandra. 1981. Dialect relations in Cree / Montagnais / Naskapi: Verb paradigms. Montreal Working Papers in Linguistics 16: 135–192.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mailhot, José, MacKenzie, Marguerite & Junker, Marie-Odile (eds). 2013. Online Innu dictionary. <[URL]> (19 March 2015).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 1999. The Languages of Native North America. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank R. 2001. Mood and Modality. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shipley, William F. 1964. Maidu Grammar. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
St-Onge André, Anne-Marie. 1997. An-Mani utipatshimunissima (Anne-Marie’s little stories). Sept-Îles: Institut culturel et éducatif Montagnais.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan, Dobrushina, Nina & Goussev, Valentin. 2013. The imperative-hortative systems. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <[URL]> (20 March 2015).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xrakovskij, Victor S. (ed.). 2001. Typology of Imperative Constructions. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald
2018. The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue