Cover not available

In:Negation and Contact: With special focus on Singapore English
Edited by Debra Ziegeler and Zhiming Bao
[Studies in Language Companion Series 183] 2017
► pp. 33–61

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 3
NEG-raising and long-distance licensing of negative polarity items

 | University of Groningen
Published online: 31 May 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.183.03hoe
Abstract
Collins and Postal (2014) have thrown new light on the relation between negation and complementation in contexts that either do or do not permit NEG-raising; in particular, that there are two types of polarity items differing in whether they require NEG-raising for long-distance licensing by negation. Strict items (such as English all that and various other NPIs) require clause-mate licensers, which may undergo NEG-raising to a higher clause (by means of a syntactic transformation) whereas non-strict items (such as any) may also be licensed by negation originating in a higher clause. In this chapter I review the evidence for such a distinction, arguing against a syntactic solution in terms of Neg-Raising, and proposing that the matrix predicate type is relevant for licensing embedded polarity items not only in cases of Neg-Raising, but also in questions. Using a corpus of polarity items in English and Dutch, I discuss various complications that arise in long-distance licensing, including interaction with modals and idiomatic readings of embedding predicates.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Collins & Postal’s Classical Neg-Raising
    • 2.1Evidence from inversion
    • 2.2Evidence from strict negative polarity items
    • 2.3 Evidence from Dutch heel
    • 2.4Evidence from positive polarity items
    • 2.5Evidence from multiple licensing
    • 2.6Evidence from partial cyclicity
  • 3.Factive and nonfactive think
  • 4.Complex predicates and long-distance licensing
    • 4.1Hebben + dat-clause in Dutch
    • 4.2Zeggen + modal / Say + modal
  • 5.Corpus data in long-distance licensing by negation
  • 6.Long-distance licensing in questions and elsewhere
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (52)
References
Aguilar Guevara, Ana, Aloni, Maria, Port, Angelika, Simik, Radek, de Vos, Machteld & Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2011. Semantics and pragmatics of indefinites: methodology for a synchronic and diachronic corpus study. In Proceedings of Beyond Semantics – Corpus-based investigations of pragmatic and discourse phenomena, 1–16. Special issue of BLA (Bochumer Linguistische Arbeiten).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bao, Zhiming & Luwen Cao (2017). Negative Raising in Singapore English. This volume, 151-170.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bartsch, Renate. 1973. “Negative transportation” gibt es nicht. Linguistische Berichte 27(7): 1–7.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
ter Beek, Janneke. 2008. Restructuring and Infinitival Complements in Dutch. PhD dissertation, University of Groningen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Collins, Chris & Postal, Paul M. 2014. Classical Neg-Raising. An Essay on the Syntax of Negation. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015. Dispelling the cloud of unknowing. Unpublished paper, <[URL]>
Coppen, Peter-Arno. 2013. De zin die wij merken dat ook voor linguïstische problemen zorgt. Nederlandse Taalkunde 18(2): 193–203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
den Dikken, Marcel. 2002. Direct and parasitic polarity item licensing. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 5(1): 35–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Parasitism, secondary triggering and depth of embedding. In Cross-linguistic Research in Syntax and Semantics: Negation, Tense, and Clausal Architecture, Raffaella Zanuttini, Héctor Campos, Elena Herburger & Paul H. Portner (eds), 151–174. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eckardt, Regine. 2006. Meaning Change in Grammaticalization: An Enquiry into Semantic Reanalysis. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph E. 1976. A Transformational Approach to English Syntax: Root, Structure-preserving, and Local Transformations. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004. Unspecified categories as the key to root constructions. In Peripheries: Syntactic Edges and Their Effects, David Adger, Cécile De Cat & Georges Tsoulas (eds), 75–121. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evers, Arnold. 1975. The Transformational Cycle in Dutch and German. PhD dissertation, University of Utrecht.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles. 1963. The position of embedding transformations in a grammar. Word 19(2): 208–231. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gajewski, Jon. 2007. Neg-Raising and Polarity. Linguistics & Philosophy 30(3): 289–328. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Licensing strong NPIs. Natural Language Semantics 19(2): 109–148. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia. 1998. Polarity Sensitivity as (non) Veridical Dependency [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia & Quer, Josep. 1997. Long-distance licensing of negative indefinites. In Negation and Polarity. Syntax and Semantics, Danielle Forget, Paul Hirschbühler, France Martineau & María-Luisa Rivero (eds), 95–113. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2006. Only, emotive factive verbs, and the dual nature of polarity dependency. Language 82(3): 575–603. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Positive polarity items and negative polarity items: Variation, licensing, and compositionality. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, 2nd edn, Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds.), 1660–1712. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 2012. Adverbial Clauses, Main Clause Phenomena, and Composition of the Left Periphery: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heycock, Caroline. 2006. Embedded root phenomena. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 174–209. Malden MA: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoeksema, Jack. 1999. Aantekeningen bij ooit, deel 2: De opkomst van niet-polair ooit . Tabu 29(4): 147–172.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Negative polarity items: Triggering, Scope, and C-Command. In Negation and Polarity: Syntactic and Semantic Perspectives, Laurence R. Horn & Yasuhiko Kato (eds), 115–145. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. In days, weeks, months, years, ages: A class of temporal negative polarity items. In Rejected Papers: Feestbundel voor Ron van Zonneveld, Dicky Gilbers & Petra Hendriks (eds). Groningen: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Hij zei van niet, maar knikte van ja: Distributie en diachronie van bijwoorden van polariteit ingeleid door van . Tabu 35(3–4): 135–158.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Parasitic licensing of negative polarity items. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 10(3): 163–182. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Dutch ENIG: From nonveridicality to downward entailment. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 28(4): 837–859. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Wie dan ook, wat dan ook etc. als free choice indefinites en negatief-polaire uitdrukkingen. Tabu 40(3–4), 89–109.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Eric. 1991. Licensing Conditions on Phrase Structure. PhD dissertation, University of Groningen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan B. & Thompson, Sandra. 1973. On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic inquiry 4(4): 465–497.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence R. 1971. Negative transportation: Unsafe at any speed? Proceedings of the 7th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 120–133. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1975. NEG-raising predicates: Toward an explanation. In Proceedings of the 11th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 11, 280–294. Chicago IL: CLS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1978. Remarks on NEG-raising. In Pragmatics, Syntax and semantics 9, Peter Cole (ed.), 129–220. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2001. Flaubert triggers, squatitive negation, and other quirks of grammar. In Perspectives on Negation and Polarity Items [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 40], Jack Hoeksema, Hotze Rullmann, Víctor Sánchez-Valencia & Ton van der Wouden (eds), 173–200. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014. The cloud of unknowing. In Black Book: A Festschrift for Frans Zwarts, Jack Hoeksema & Dicky Gilbers (eds), 178–196. Groningen: University of Groningen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence R. & Kato, Yasuhiko. 2000. Introduction: Negation and polarity at the millennium. In Negation and Polarity. Syntactic and Semantic Perspectives, Laurence R. Horn & Yasuhiko Kato (eds), 1–19. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Israel, Michael. 2011. The Grammar of Polarity: Pragmatics, Sensitivity, and the Logic of Scales. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ladusaw, William A. 1979. Polarity Sensitivity as Inherent Scope Relations. PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Popp, Marie-Luise. 2016. NEG-raising in cross-linguistic perspective. MA thesis, University of Leipzig.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Postal, Paul M. 2005. Suppose (if only for an hour) that negative polarity items are negation-containing phrases. Ms, New York University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen. 1976. The syntax and semantics of Neg-Raising, with evidence from French. Language 52(2): 404–426. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Progovac, Ljiljana. 1994. Negative and Positive Polarity: A Binding Approach. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Romoli, Jacopo. 2012. Soft but Strong: NEG-raising, Soft Triggers, and Exhaustification. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. A scalar implicature-based approach to neg-raising. Linguistics and Philosophy 36: 291–353. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ross, John Robert. 1967. Constraints on Variables in Syntax. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seuren, Pieter A.M. 1974. Negative’s travels. In Semantic Syntax, Pieter A.M. Seuren (ed.), 96–122. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013. The Seuren Blog. Neg-Raising 4. December 7, 2013. <[URL]>
de Swart, Henriëtte E. 1998. Licensing of negative polarity items under inverse scope. Lingua 105(3): 175–200. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Uribe-Echevarria, Maria. 1993. Towards an LF theory of negative polarity licensing. In Proceedings of the 23rd Western Conference on Linguistics, Sharon Hargus, Gerald McMenamin & Vida Samiian (eds), 464–476. Fresno: Department of Linguistics, California State University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zwarts, Frans. 1995. Nonveridical contexts. Linguistic Analysis 25: 286–312.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. Three types of polarity. In Plurality and Quantification, Fritz Hamm & Erhard Hinrichs (eds.), 177–238. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (48)

Cited by 48 other publications

Li, Yafei & Jen Ting
2024. The particle s uo in Mandarin Chinese: a case of long X0-dependency and a reexamination of the Principle of Minimal Compliance. Linguistics 62:2 ► pp. 421 ff. DOI logo
Beaver, David & Kristin Denlinger
2020. Negation and Presupposition. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 369 ff. DOI logo
Bohn, Manuel, Josep Call & Christoph J. Völter
2020. Evolutionary Precursors of Negation in Non-Human Reasoning. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 577 ff. DOI logo
Breitbarth, Anne
2020. The Negative Cycle and Beyond. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 530 ff. DOI logo
Christensen, Ken Ramshøj
2020. The Neurology of Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 725 ff. DOI logo
De Clercq, Karen
2020. Types of Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 58 ff. DOI logo
de Swart, Henriëtte
2020. Double Negation Readings. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 479 ff. DOI logo
Delfitto, Denis
2020. Expletive Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 255 ff. DOI logo
Dwivedi, Veena D.
2020. Individual Differences in Processing of Negative Operators. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 713 ff. DOI logo
Viviane Déprez & M. Teresa Espinal
2020. The Oxford Handbook of Negation, DOI logo
Fleisher, Nicholas
2020. Calculating the Scope of Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 269 ff. DOI logo
Francis, Naomi & Sabine Iatridou
2020. Modals and Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 285 ff. DOI logo
Fălăuş, Anamaria
2020. Negation and Alternatives. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 333 ff. DOI logo
Giannakidou, Anastasia
2020. Negative Concord and the Nature of Negative Concord Items. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 458 ff. DOI logo
Gianollo, Chiara
2020. Evolution of Negative Dependencies. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 546 ff. DOI logo
Gianollo, Chiara
2020. The Morpho-Syntactic Nature of the Negative Marker. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 117 ff. DOI logo
Grodzinsky, Yosef, Virginia Jaichenco, Isabelle Deschamps, María Elina Sánchez, Martín Fuchs, Peter Pieperhoff, Yonatan Loewenstein & Katrin Amunts
2020. Negation and the Brain. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 694 ff. DOI logo
Hochmann, Jean-Rémy
2020. Cognitive Precursors of Negation in Preverbal Infants. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 589 ff. DOI logo
Horn, Laurence R.
2020. Negation and Opposition. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 7 ff. DOI logo
Horn, Laurence R.
2020. Neg-raising. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 199 ff. DOI logo
Joshi, Shrikant
2020. Affixal Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 75 ff. DOI logo
Kaup, Barbara & Carolin Dudschig
2020. Understanding Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 635 ff. DOI logo
Larrivée, Pierre
2020. The Role of Pragmatics in Negation Change. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 563 ff. DOI logo
Martins, Ana Maria
2020. Metalinguistic Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 349 ff. DOI logo
Mayr, Clemens
2020. Intervention Effects with Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 216 ff. DOI logo
Moeschler, Jacques
2020. Negative Predicates. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 26 ff. DOI logo
Muller, Hanna & Colin Phillips
2020. Negative Polarity Illusions. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 656 ff. DOI logo
Papeo, Liuba & Manuel de Vega
2020. The Neurobiology of Lexical and Sentential Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 740 ff. DOI logo
Pearce, Elizabeth
2020. Negation and Constituent Ordering. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 152 ff. DOI logo
Poletto, Cecilia
2020. The Possible Positioning of Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 135 ff. DOI logo
Prieto, Pilar & M. Teresa Espinal
2020. Negation, Prosody, and Gesture. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 677 ff. DOI logo
Quer, Josep
2020. The Expression of Negation in Sign Languages. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 177 ff. DOI logo
Ripley, David
2020. Denial. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 47 ff. DOI logo
Romero, Maribel
2020. Form and Function of Negative, Tag, and Rhetorical Questions. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 235 ff. DOI logo
Schein, Barry
2020. Negation in Event Semantics. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 301 ff. DOI logo
Sánchez, Liliana & Jennifer Austin
2020. Negation in L2 Acquisition and Beyond. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 615 ff. DOI logo
Thornton, Rosalind
2020. Negation and First Language Acquisition. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 599 ff. DOI logo
Tortora, Christina & Frances Blanchette
2020. Negation in Non-Standard Varieties. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 515 ff. DOI logo
Tovena, Lucia M.
2020. Negative Polarity Items. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 391 ff. DOI logo
Tubau, Susagna
2020. Minimizers and Maximizers as Different Types of Polarity Items. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 407 ff. DOI logo
van der Auwera, Johan & Olga Krasnoukhova
2020. The Typology of Negation. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 91 ff. DOI logo
Wallage, Phillip
2020. Quantitative Studies of the Use of Negative (Dependent) Expressions. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 499 ff. DOI logo
Weir, Andrew
2020. Negative Fragment Answers. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 441 ff. DOI logo
Zeijlstra, Hedde
2020. Negative Quantifiers. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 426 ff. DOI logo
Osborne, Timothy & Matthew Reeve
2018. Scope domains Toward a Dependency Grammar account of the syntactic distribution of negative polarity items. Acta Linguistica Academica 65:1 ► pp. 119 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. Introduction. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. Abbreviations. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. xi ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. Copyright Page. In The Oxford Handbook of Negation, ► pp. iv ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue