In:Lexical Polycategoriality: Cross-linguistic, cross-theoretical and language acquisition approaches
Edited by Valentina Vapnarsky and Edy Veneziano
[Studies in Language Companion Series 182] 2017
► pp. 101–153
Polycategoriality and hybridity across Mayan languages
Action nouns and ergative splits
Published online: 1 November 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.182.05loi
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.182.05loi
This article presents a comparative study of Mayan languages belonging to three different branches (Cholan, Tseltalan and Yucatecan), with respect to polycategoriality. Mayan languages appear to be particularly interesting for exploring polycategoriality for several structural reasons, as well as for the way relevant properties vary across the Mayan family. We analyze levels and processes of categorial determination and their relationship with other facts, in particular the ergative splits (aspectual and agentive). We study morphophonological, morphosyntactic and semantic properties for evaluating polycategoriality at the root or stem level. At the structure level, we put forth the hypothesis of a hybrid nature based on simultaneous nominal and verbal properties. For some cases, a reanalysis from nominal to verbal stems is proposed.
Keywords: Mayan languages, lexical category, polycategoriality, ergativity, verbal noun, agency
Article outline
- Introduction
- 1.Three contrasting Mayan branches: Yucatecan, Cholan, Tseltalan
- 2.Main word-formation patterns for V/N changes and polycategoriality
- 2.1The semantics of nouns in possible polycategorial pairs
- 2.2Implications for roots and lexical categories
- 3.Polycategoriality and the aspectual split
- 3.1 Action nouns and the imperfective: Main constructions
- 3.2The role of Aspect in imperfective constructions
- 3.2.1Aspect as main predicate
- 3.2.2The prepositional construction (PC)
- 3.2.3Direct combination with Aspect (DCA)
- 3.2.3.1Contrasting properties of Aspect markers
- 3.2.3.2DCA in Yucatecan languages
- 3.2.3.3DCA in Cholan languages and Tseltal
- 3.2.4Adverbial distribution in PC and DCA
- 3.2.5The –Vl suffix
- 3.3Conclusive remarks on imperfective forms, hybridity and polycategoriality
- 4.Agentives and the agentive split
- 4.1Agentives in Yucatecan languages
- 4.2Agentives in Cholan languages
- 4.3An agentive/non-agentive distinction in Tseltal?
- 5.Conclusion
Notes References
References (61)
Armstrong, G. 2009. On copular sentences in Yucatec Maya.
Proceedings of the Conference on Indigenous Languages of Latin America-IV
. <[URL]> (8 November 2015).
Becquey, C. 2014. Diasystème, diachronie: Etudes comparées dans les langues cholanes. Utrecht: LOT (Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics). <[URL]>.
Berlin, B. & Kaufman, T. 1977. Diccionario tzeltal de Tenejapa, Chiapas [Microfilm Collection of Manuscripts on Cultural Anthropology, Series LIII, 281]. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Library.
Bohnemeyer, J. 1998. Time Relations in Discourse. Evidence from a Comparative Approach to Yukatek Maya. PhD dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Brabant.
Briceño Chel, F. 1997. De gramaticalización y degramaticalización: Dos procesos en el maya yucateco actual. MA dissertation, Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia, México.
Bricker, V. 1978. Antipassive constructions in Yucatec Maya. In Papers in Mayan Linguistics, N. England (ed.), 3–24. Columbia MO: University of Missouri.
. 1981. The source of the ergative split in Yukatek Maya. Journal of Mayan Linguistics 2(2): 83–127.
Coon, J. 2010. Complementation in Chol (Mayan): A Theory of Split Ergativity. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Croft, W. 1991. Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Danziger, E. 1996. Split intransitivity and active-inactive patterning in Mopan Maya. International Journal of American Linguistics 62(4): 379–414.
Gutiérrez Sánchez, P. 2004. Las clases de verbos intransitivos y el alineamiento agentivo en el Chol de Tila, Chiapas. MA dissertation, CIESAS, Mexico.
Gutiérrez Sánchez, P. & Zavala Maldonado, R. 2005. Chol and Chontal: Two Mayan languages of the agentive type. Paper presented at The
Typology of
Stative-Active Languages
. Leipzig: Max-Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Haviland, J. 1994. “Te xa setel xulem” (The buzzards were circling): Categories of verbal roots in (Zinacantec) Tzotil. Linguistics 32: 691–741.
Justeson, J., Norman, W., Campbell, L. & Kaufman, T. 1985. The Foreign Impact on Lowland Mayan Language and Script. New Orleans LO: Middle American Research Institute, Tulane University.
Kaufman, T. 1971. Tzeltal Phonology and Morphology. Berkeley CA: University of California publications in linguistics.
. 1976. Archeological and linguistic correlations in Mayaland and associated areas of Meso-America. World Archeology 8: 101–118.
. 1990. Algunos rasgos estructurales de los idiomas mayances con referencia especial al k’iche. In Lecturas sobre la lingüística maya, N. England & S. Elliot (eds), 9–114. La Antigua, Guatemala: Centro de Investigaciones Regionales de Mesoamérica.
Knowles-Berry, S. 1984. A Descriptive Grammar of Chontal Maya, San Carlos Dialect. PhD dissertation, Tulane University, New Orleans.
Langacker, R. 1977. Syntactic reanalysis. In Mechanisms of Syntactic Change, C. Li (ed.), 57–139. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.
Larsen, T. & Norman, W. 1979. Correlates of ergativity in Mayan grammar. In Ergativity: Toward a Theory of Grammatical Relations, F. Plank (ed.), 347–370. London: Academic Press.
Leonard, J.L., Gendrot, C. & Polian, G. 2011. Voyelles réarticulées en tseltal: Pertinence d'une approche dialectologique et expérimentale pour la typologie phonologique. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris CVI (1): 395–449.
Lois, X. 2011. Roots and patterns in Yucatecan languages. In Proceedings of Formal Approaches to Mayan Linguistics [MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 63], K. Shklovksy, P. Mateo Pedro & J. Coon (eds), 147–169. Cambridge MA: MITWPL.
Lois, X. & Vapnarsky, V. 2003. Polyvalence of Root Classes in Yukatekan Mayan Languages [Studies in Native American Linguistics 47]. Munich: Lincom.
. 2006. Root indeterminacy and polyvalence in Yukatekan Mayan languages. In Lexical Categories and Root Classes in Amerindian Languages, X. Lois & V. Vapnarsky (eds), 69–115. Bern: Peter Lang.
Lois, X., Vapnarsky, V., Fréger, C. & Atran, S. 2010. Itza’ Memorias Mayas. Mérida, México: Universidad Autónoma de México.
Lopéz Sántiz, A. del C. 2005. Palabras Tejidas. Jalbil k’opetik. Tuxtla Gutierrez: Gobierno del Estado de Chiapas.
Lucy, J. 1994. The role of semantic value in lexical comparison: Motion and position roots in Yucatec maya. Linguistics 32: 623–656.
Marantz, A. 1997. No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. In Proceedings of the 21th Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium [Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 4:2], A. Dimitriadis, L. Siegel, C. Surek-Clark & A. Williams (eds), 201–225. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsilvania.
Osorio May, J. del C. 2005. Análisis de la morfología verbal del Yokot’an, “Chontal” del Poblado de Tecoluta, Nacajuca, Tabasco. MA dissertation, CIESAS, Mexico.
Polian, G. & Leonard, J.L. 2009. La morphologie dans ALTO (Atlas Linguistique du Tseltal Occidental). Réseau dialectal et systèmes à décideurs multiples. Géolinguistique 11: 149–201.
Polian, G. 2013a. Infinitivos transitivos: Innovaciones del Tseltal en la familia Maya. In Clases léxicas, posesión y cláusulas complejas en lenguas de Mesoamérica, E. Palancar & R. Zavala (eds), 339–380. México: CIESAS.
Pye, C. 2009. Cycles of complementation in the Mayan languages. In Cyclical Change [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 146], E. van Gelderen (ed.), 265–284. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2011. Mayan stative predication. In Proceedings of Formal Approaches to Mayan Linguistics [MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 63], K. Shklovksy, P. Mateo Pedro & J. Coon (eds), 191–207. Cambridge MA: MITWPL.
Quizar, R. & Knowles-Berry, S. 1988. Ergativity in the Cholan languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 54(1): 73–85.
. 1990. Ergatividad en los idiomas ch’oles. In Lecturas sobre la lingüística maya, N. England & S.E. Elliott (eds), 301–318. Guatemala: Centro de Investigaciones Regionales de Mesoamérica.
Robertson, J. 1980. The Structure of Pronoun Incorporation in the Mayan Verbal Complex. New York NY: Garland.
Robertson. J. 1992. The History of Tense/Aspect/Mood/Voice in the Mayan Verbal Complex. Austin TX: University of Texan Press.
Robertson, J. 1998. A Ch'olti'an Explanation for Ch'orti'an Grammar: A Postlude to the Language of the Classic Maya. Mayab 11: 5–11.
Robles Uribe, C. 1966. La dialectología tzeltal y el diccionario compacto. México: Instituto Nacional de Antropología.
Schumann, O. 1997. Introducción al Maya Mopán. México DF: Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
Ulrich. M., Ulrich, R. & Peck, C. 1986. Mopan Mayan Verbs. Guatemala: Instituto Linguístico de Verano.
Vapnarsky, V. 1999. Expressions et conceptions de la temporalité chez les Mayas Yucatèques du Quintana Roo. PhD dissertation, University of Paris 10, Nanterre.
Vapnarsky, V. & Lois, X. 2009. Morphosyntactic and semantic issues on polycategoriality in Yucatecan Mayan languages. Talk presented at
ALT 8
, Berkely, July.
Vapnarsky, V. 2013. Is Yucatec an omnipredicative language? Predication, the copula and focus constructions. Language Typology and Universals 66: 40–86.
Vázquez Álvarez, J. 2002. Morfología del verbo de la lengua chol de Tila Chiapas. MA dissertation, CIESAS, México.
Wisdom, C. 1950. Materials on the Chorti Languages [Microfilm of the Collection Manuscripts on Middle American Cultural Anthropology 28]. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Library.
Zavala, R. 2007. The agentive alignment pattern in Cholan and K’ichean (Mayan). Paper presented in the
AALLED conference
, Lyon, France, February.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Firmino-Castillo, María Regina, Daniel Fernando Guarcax González & TOHIL / Fidel Brito Bernal
van Lier, Eva
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
