References (45)
References
Alarcos Llorach, Emilio. 2005. Gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boye, Kasper. 2010. Reference and clausal perception-verb complements. Linguistics 48(2): 391–430. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cano Aguilar, Rafael. 1987. Estructuras Sintácticas Transitivas en el Español Actual. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1992. The pseudo-relative and acc-ing constructions after verbs of perception. Working Papers in Linguistics 2: 1–31. University of VeniceGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ciutescu, Elena. 2013. Remarks on the infinitival subject of perception verb complements: Evidence for two syntactic configurations. RRL LVIII (3): 299–312.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia. 2003. Subordination. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cruz Domínguez, Irasema. 2014. Caracterización semántica-sintáctica del verbo de percepción sentir. MA dissertation, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Demonte, Violeta & Masullo, Pascual J. 1999. La predicación: Los complementos predicativos. In Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española, Vol. II, Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds), 2461–2523. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dik, Simon & Hengeveld, Kees. 1991. The hierarchical structure of the clause and the typology of perception-verb complements. Linguistics 29: 231–259. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Di Tullio, Ángela. 1998. Complementos no-flexivos de verbos de percepción física en español. Verba 25: 197–221.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enghels, Renata. 2007. Les modalités de perception visuelle et auditive: Différences conceptuelles et répercussions sémantico-syntaxiques en espagnol et en français. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Transitivity of Spanish perception verbs: A gradual category? Borealis. An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 2(1): 36–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enghels, Renata & Jansegers, Marlies. 2012. Sentir: Un verbo en la intersección de las lenguas románicas. XXVI Congrès International de Linguistique et de Philologie Romanes, Valencia, 6–11 September 2010.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. On the cross-linguistic equivalence of sentir(e) in Romance languages: a contrastive study in semantics. Linguistics 51(5): 957–991. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas & Wilkins, David P. 2000. In the mind’s ear: The semantic extensions of perception verbs in Australian languages. Language 76(3): 546–592. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Faber, Pamela & Mairal Usón, Ricardo. 1998. The paradigmatic and the syntagmatic structure of the lexical field of feeling and its extensions to other domains. In Cuadernos de Investigación Filológica XXIII-XXIV: 35–60. Logroño: Universidad de La Rioja.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernández Jaén, Jorge. 2006. Verbos de percepción sensorial en español: Una clasificación cognitiva. Interlingüística 16: 1–14.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Semántica cognitiva diacrónica de los verbos de percepción física del español. PhD dissertation, University of Alicante.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guasti, María Teresa. 1989. Romance infinitive complements of perception verbs. MIT Working papers in Linguistics 11: 31–45.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gumiel Molina, Silvia. 2005. Los complementos predicativos. Madrid: Arco/Libros.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hanegreefs, Hilde. 2008. Los verbos de percepción visual. Un análisis de corpus en un marco cognitivo. Leuven: KU Leuven.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hernanz Carbó, María Lluïsa. 1988. En torno a la sintaxis de los complementos predicativos en español. Estudi General 8: 7–29.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus & Schultze-Berndt, Eva. 2005. Issues in the syntax and semantics of participant-oriented adjuncts: An introduction. In Secondary Predication and Adverbial Modification. The Typology of Depictives. Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Eva Schultze-Berndt (eds), 285–308. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert, Martins, Ana María & Nunes, Jairo. 2006. Infinitival complements of perception and causative verbs: A case study on agreement and intervention effects in English and European Portuguese. University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics 14: 81–110. <[URL]>
Ibarretxe Antuñano, Iraide. 1999. Polysemy and Metaphor in Perception Verbs: A Cross Linguistic Study. PhD dissertation, The University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jansegers, Marlies & Enghels, Renata. 2013. De verbo de percepción a marcador de disculpa: La evolución diacrónica del verbo sentir en español. Revue de Linguistique Romane 305–306: 139–166.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jansegers, Marlies & Cruz Domínguez, Irasema. 2016. La polisemia del verbo sentir: Estudio contrastivo de las variantes peninsular y mexicana. Bulletin of Hispanic Studies, 305: 924–947.
Jansegers, Marlies, Enghels, Renta & Cruz Domínguez, Irasema. In press. El carácter multimodal del verbo sentir: Polisemia y transitividad. Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie.
Kirsner, Robert & Thompson, Sandra. 1976. The role of pragmatic inference in semantics: A study of sensory verb complements in English. Glossa 10(2): 200–240.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lozano Jaén, Ginés & Valero Cifuentes, María Lucía. 2012. En torno a las oraciones subordinadas de complemento predicativo. Revista de Electrónica de Estudios Filológicos 22. <[URL]>
Martín Butragueño, Pedro & Lastra, Yolanda. 1997. Corpus Sociolingüístico de la Ciudad de México. El Colegio de México. <[URL]>
Martínez, José Antonio. 2005. La oración compuesta y compleja. Madrid: Arco/ Libros.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moore, John. 1996. Reduced Constructions in Spanish. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morimoto, Yuko. 2006. Análisis comparativo de encontrarse y sentirse: Entre la predicación y la atribución. Actas del XXXV Simposio Internacional de la Sociedad Española de Lingüística, 1331–134. <[URL]>
Sweetser, Eve. 1990. Semantic structure and semantic change: English perception verbs in an Indo-European Context. In From Etymology to Pragmatics. Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suñer, Margarita. 1978. Perception verb complements in Spanish: Same or different. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 23: 107–127.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Real Academia Española: Banco de datos (CREA) [on line]. Corpus de referencia del español actual. <[URL]>
Van der Auwera, Johan. 1985. The predicative relatives of French perception verbs. In Predicates and Terms in Functional Grammar, A. Machtelt Bolkestein, Casper Groot & J. Lachlan Mackenzie (eds), 219–234. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Valin Jr., Robert D. & LaPolla, Randy. 1997. Syntax: Structure, Meaning and Function. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vanhove, Martine. 2008. Semantic associations between sensory modalities, prehension and mental perceptions: A crosslinguistic perspective. In From Polysemy to Semantic Change. Towards a Typology of Lexical Semantic Associations [Studies in Language Companion Series 106], Martine Vanhove (ed.), 341–370. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vázquez Rojas, Violeta. 2005. La interpretación del subjuntivo español como marca de integración entre eventos. In Sintaxis del español e interfase sintaxis-semántica, Martha Islas & Cynthia Ramírez (eds), 139–154. Toluca: UAEM.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verbeke, Charlotte. 2011. Sentir: ¿un verbo de percepción o un verbo de emoción? MA dissertation, Ghent University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vesterinen, Rainer. 2010. The relation between iconicity and subjectification in Portuguese complementation: Complements of perception and causation Verbs. Cognitive Linguistics 21(3): 573–600. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Viberg, Åke. 1984. The verbs of perception: A typological study. Linguistics 21: 123–162.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whitt, Richard Jason. 2010. Evidentiality and Perception Verbs in English and German. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (16)

Cited by 16 other publications

Fendel, Victoria Beatrix Maria
2022. Summary and Conclusion. In Coptic Interference in the Syntax of Greek Letters from Egypt,  pp. 445 ff. DOI logo
Fendel, Victoria Beatrix Maria
2022. Coptic Interference in the Syntax of Greek Letters from Egypt, DOI logo
Fendel, Victoria Beatrix Maria
2022. Concepts, Contexts, Corpora. In Coptic Interference in the Syntax of Greek Letters from Egypt,  pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
Fendel, Victoria Beatrix Maria
2022. Copyright Page. In Coptic Interference in the Syntax of Greek Letters from Egypt,  pp. iv ff. DOI logo
Fendel, Victoria Beatrix Maria
2022. Discourse Markers. In Coptic Interference in the Syntax of Greek Letters from Egypt,  pp. 323 ff. DOI logo
Fendel, Victoria Beatrix Maria
2022. List of Abbreviations. In Coptic Interference in the Syntax of Greek Letters from Egypt,  pp. xi ff. DOI logo
Fendel, Victoria Beatrix Maria
2022. Formulaic Language. In Coptic Interference in the Syntax of Greek Letters from Egypt,  pp. 365 ff. DOI logo
Fendel, Victoria Beatrix Maria
2022. Semi-formulaic Phrases. In Coptic Interference in the Syntax of Greek Letters from Egypt,  pp. 413 ff. DOI logo
Fendel, Victoria Beatrix Maria
2022. Sigla. In Coptic Interference in the Syntax of Greek Letters from Egypt,  pp. xiii ff. DOI logo
Fendel, Victoria Beatrix Maria
2022. Verb Phrases. In Coptic Interference in the Syntax of Greek Letters from Egypt,  pp. 237 ff. DOI logo
Fendel, Victoria Beatrix Maria
2022. The Basics of Coptic Grammar. In Coptic Interference in the Syntax of Greek Letters from Egypt,  pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
Fendel, Victoria Beatrix Maria
2022. Adverbial Phrases. In Coptic Interference in the Syntax of Greek Letters from Egypt,  pp. 295 ff. DOI logo
Fendel, Victoria Beatrix Maria
2022. Dedication. In Coptic Interference in the Syntax of Greek Letters from Egypt,  pp. v ff. DOI logo
Fendel, Victoria Beatrix Maria
2022. The Grammar of the Corpus (Standard and Variation). In Coptic Interference in the Syntax of Greek Letters from Egypt,  pp. 131 ff. DOI logo
Fendel, Victoria Beatrix Maria
2022.  Corpus of Texts. In Coptic Interference in the Syntax of Greek Letters from Egypt,  pp. 485 ff. DOI logo
Fendel, Victoria Beatrix Maria
2022. Introduction. In Coptic Interference in the Syntax of Greek Letters from Egypt,  pp. 3 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue