Cover not available

In:Outside the Clause: Form and function of extra-clausal constituents
Edited by Gunther Kaltenböck, Evelien Keizer and Arne Lohmann
[Studies in Language Companion Series 178] 2016
► pp. 1–26

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Extra-clausal constituents

An overview

 | University of Vienna
 | University of Vienna
 | University of Vienna
Published online: 3 October 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.178.01kal
References (112)
References
Aijmer, Karin. 1997. “I think” – An English modal particle. In Modality in Germanic Languages. Historical and Comparative Perspectives, Toril Swan & Olaf Jansen Westvik (eds), 1-47. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. The interface between discourse and grammar: The fact is that . In Connectives as Discourse Landmarks [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 161], Agnès Celle & Ruth Huart (eds), 31-46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Understanding Pragmatic Markers: A Variational Pragmatic Approach. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arnold, Doug. 2007. Non-restrictive relatives are not orphans. Journal of Linguistics 43: 271-309. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arnold, Dough. 2004. Non-restrictive relative clauses in construction-based HPSG. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, Stefan Müller (ed.), 27-47. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Astruc, Lluisa. 2005. The Intonation of Extra-sentential Elements in Catalan and English. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Averintseva-Klisch, Maria. 2008. To the right of the clause: Right dislocation vs. afterthought. In 'Subordination' versus 'Coordination' in Sentence and Text: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series 98], Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen & Wiebke Ramm (eds), 217-239. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. The grammar of telegraphic structures: Sentential and nonsentential derivation. Journal of English Linguistics 26: 37-67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bayer, Klaus. 1973. Verteilung und Funktion der sogenannten Parenthese in Texten. Deutsche Sprache 1: 64-115.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane. 2006. Divisions of labour: The analysis of parentheticals. Lingua 116: 1670-1687. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1962[1933]. Language. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1989. Intonation and its Uses: Melody in Grammar and Discourse. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boye, Kasper & Harder, Peter. 2007. Complement-taking predicates: Usage and linguistic structure. Studies in Language 31(3): 569-606. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brenier, Jason M. & Michaelis, Laura A. 2005. Optimization via syntactic amalgam: Syntax-prosody mismatch and copula doubling. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1(1): 45-88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2005. Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 1996. Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions [Topics in English Linguistics 19]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. The Comment Clause in English: Syntactic Origins and Pragmatic Development [Studies in English Language]. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burton-Roberts, Noel. 1999. Language, linear precedence and parentheticals. In The Clause in English [Studies in Language Companion Series 45], Peter Collins & David Lee (eds), 33-52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Parentheticals. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd edn, Vol. 9, Keith Brown (ed.), 179-182. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carter, Ronald & McCarthy, Michael. 2006. Cambridge Grammar of English. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corum, Claudia. 1975. A pragmatic analysis of parenthetic adjuncts. Chicago Linguistic Society 11: 133-141.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crystal, David. 1969. Prosodic Systems and Intonation in English. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dehé, Nicole. 2014. Parentheticals in Spoken English: The Syntax-prosody Relation. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dehé, Nicole & Kavalova, Yordanka. 2007. Parentheticals [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 106]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dik, Simon C. 1997. The Theory of Functional Grammar, Part 2: Complex and Derived Constructions. [Functional Grammar Series 21]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph. 1973. Parenthetical clauses. In You Take the High Node and I’ll Take the Low Node, Claudia Corum, Thomas Cedric Smith-Stark & Ann Weiser (eds), 333-347. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1976. A Transformational Approach to English Syntax. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1979. Appositive relatives have no properties. Linguistic Inquiry 10(2): 211-243.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erman, Britt & Kotsinas, Ulla-Britt. 1993. Pragmaticalization: The case of ba and you know . Studier I modern språkvetenskap [Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis, New Series] 10: 76-93. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Espinal, M. Teresa. 1991. The representation of disjunct constituents. Language 67: 726-762. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, Nicolas. 2007. Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nicolaeva (ed.), 366-431. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fabb, Nigel. 1990. The difference between English restrictive and nonrestrictive relative clauses. Journal of Linguistics 26: 57-78. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga. 2007. Morphosyntactic Change. Functional and Formal Perspectives. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin. 2010. Constructions, frames and spoken interaction. Constructions and Frames 2(2): 185-207.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frank-Job, Barbara. 2006. A dynamic-interactional approach to discourse markers. In Approaches to Discourse Particles, Kerstin Fischer (ed.), 359-374. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frota Sónia. 2000. Prosody and Focus in European Portuguese. Phonological Phrasing and Intonation. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grenoble, Lenore. 2004. Parentheticals in Russian. Journal of Pragmatics 36(11): 1953-1974. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 1991. Parenthetical adverbials: the radical orphanage approach. In Aspects of Modern English Linguistics: Papers Presentedto Masatomo Ukaji on his 60th Birthday , Shuki Chiba, Akira Ogawa, Yasuaki Fuiwara, Norio Yamada, Osamu Koma & Takao Yagi (eds), 232-54. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
Halliday, Michael A.K. 1985. An introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hannay, Mike & de los Ángeles Gómez-González, María. 2012. Thematic parentheticals in Dutch and English. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 6: 99-127. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hannay, Michael & Keizer, Evelien. 2005. A discourse-treatment of English non-restrictive nominal appositions in Functioanl Discourse Grammer. In Studies in Functional Discourse Grammar, MaríaÁ. Gómez-González & J. Lachlan Mackenzie (eds), 159-194. Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Kaltenböck, Gunther & Kuteva, Tania. 2016. Forthcoming. On insubordination and co-optation. In Dynamics of Insubordination, Nicholas Evans & Honoré Watanabe (eds), Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. Forthcoming. Cooptation as a discourse strategy. Linguistics.
Heine, Bernd, Kaltenböck, Gunther, Kuteva, Tania & Long, Haiping. 2013. An outline of Discourse Grammar. In Functional Approaches to Language, Shannon Bischoff & Carmen Jeny (eds), 155-206. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Kuteva, Tania & Kaltenböck, Gunther. 2014. Discourse Grammar, the dual process model, and brain lateralization: Some correlations. Language and Cognition 6: 146-180. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Kuteva, Tania, Kaltenböck, Gunther & Long, Haiping. 2015. On some correlations between grammar and brain lateralization. In Oxford Handbooks Online. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Claudi, Ulrike & Hünnemeyer, Friederike. 1991. Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & Mackenzie, Lachlan. 2008. Functional Discourse Grammar. A Typologically-based Theory of Language Structure. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heringa, Herman. 2011. Appositional Constructions. Groningen: LOT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin. 2013. Constructional Change in English. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles F. 1958. A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffman, Ludger. 1998. Parenthesen. Linguistische Berichte 175: 299–328.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. 1991. On some principles of grammaticalization. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 1 [Typological Studies in Language 19(1)], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 17-35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ifantidou-Trouki, Elly. 1993. Sentential adverbs and relevance. Lingua 90(1-2): 69-90. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray S. 1977. X’ Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. & Ziv, Yael. 1998. Discourse markers: Introduction. In Discourse Markers: Description and Theory [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 57], Andreas H. Jucker & Yael Ziv (eds), 1-12. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther. 2007. Spoken parenthetical clauses in English. In Dehé & Kavalova (eds), 25-52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Prosody and function of English comment clauses. Folia Linguistica 42(1): 83-134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Development of comment clauses. In The English Verb Phrase: Investigating Recent Language Change with Corpora, Bas Aarts, Joanne Close, Geoffrey Leech, & Sean Wallis (eds), 286-317. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania. 2015. On theticals: A “rootless” analysis of I think . In Parenthetical Verbs Stefan Schneider, Julie Glikman & Mathieu Avanzi (eds), 39-70. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. On thetical grammar. Studies in Language 35(4): 848-893. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kavalova, Yordanka. 2007. And-parenthetical clauses. In Dehé & Kavalova (eds), 145-172. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keizer, Evelien. 2013. The X is (is) construction: An FDG account. In Casebook in Functional Discourse Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series 137], Lachlan Mackenzie & Hella Olbertz (eds), 213-248. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1995 [1982]. Thoughts on Grammaticalization [revised and expanded version]. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
López-Couso, María José. 1996. On the history of methinks: From impersonal construction to fossilised expression. Folia Linguistica Historica XVII: 153-169.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
López-Couso, María José & Méndez-Naya, Belén. 2014. From clause to pragmatic marker. A study of the development of like-parentheticals in American English. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 15(1): 36-61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Massam, Diane. 1999. Thing is constructions: The thing is, is what’s the right analysis? English Language and Linguistics 3(2): 335-352. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCawley, James D. 1982. Parentheticals and discontinuous constituent structure. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 91-106.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1988. The Syntactic Phenomena of English, 2 Vols. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, Jim & Weinert, Regina. 1998. Spontaneous Spoken Language: Syntax and Discourse. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 2008. The extension of dependency beyond the sentence. Language 84(1): 69-119. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina & Vogel, Irene. 1986. Prosodic Phonology [Studies in Generative Grammar 28]. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J. 2015. Parentheticals and the grammar of complementation. In Parenthetical Verbs. Stefan Schneider, Julie Glikman & Mathieu Avanzi (eds), 13-37. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palander-Collin, Minna. 1999. Grammaticalization and Social Embedding. I Think and Methinks in Middle and Early Modern English. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peterson, Peter. 1999. On the boundaries of syntax: Non-syntagmatic relations. In The Clause in English: In Honour of Rodney Huddleston [Studies in Language Companion Series 45], Peter Collins & David Lee (eds), 229-250. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petola, Niilo. 1983. Comment clauses in present-day English. In Studies in Classical and Modern Philology, Iiro Kajanto, Inna Koskenniemi & Esko Pennanen (eds), 101-113.Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pittner, Karin. 1995. Zur Syntax von Parenthesen. Linguistische Berichte 156: 85-108.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Potts, Christopher. 2003. Conventional implicatures: A distinguished class of meanings. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, Gillian Ramchand & Charles Reiss (eds), 475-501. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey. 1972. A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ross, John R. 1970. On declarative sentences. In Readings in English Transformational Grammar, R.A. Jacobs & P.S. Rosenbaum (eds), 222–272. Waltham MA: Einn & Co.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ross, John Robert. 1973. Slifting. In The Formal Analysis of Natural Languages: Proceedings of the First International Conference. Maurice Gross, Morris Halle & Marcel-Paul Schützenberger (eds), 133-169. The Hague: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rouchota, Villy. 1998. Procedural meaning and parenthetical discourse markers. In Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 57], Andreas H. Jucker & Yael Ziv (eds), 97-126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Jefferson, Gail. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50: 696-735. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Safir, Kenneth. 1986. Relative clauses in a theory of binding and levels. Linguistic Inquiry 17(4): 663-689.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schneider, Stefan, Glikman, Julie & Avanzi, Mathieu (eds), 2015. Parenthetical Verbs. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schourup, Lawrence Clifford. 1985. Common Discourse Particles in English Conversation. New York NY: GarlandGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tabor, Whitney & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1998. Structural scope expansion and grammaticalization. In The Limits of Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 37], Ramat Giacolone & Paul J. Hopper (eds), 229-272. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. & Mulac, Anthony. 1991. A quantitative perspective on the grammaticization of epistemic parentheticals in English. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 1, [Typological Studies in Language 19(1)], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 313-29. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1982. From propositional to textual and expressive meanings: Some semantic-pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. In Perspectives on Historical Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 24], Winfred P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (eds), 245-271. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1988. Pragmatic strengthening and grammaticalization. Berkeley Linguistics Society 14: 406-416. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. The role of discourse markers in a theory of grammaticalization. Paper presented at the 12th International Conference on Historical Linguistics , Manchester, England, August. <[URL]>
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tuggy, David. 1996. The thing is is that people talk that way. The question is why? In Cognitive Linguistics in the Redwoods: The Expansion of a New Paradigm in Linguistics, Eugen H. Casad (ed.), 713-752. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Urmson, James Opie. 1952. Parenthetical verbs. Mind 61: 480-496. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Bogaert, Julie. 2010. A constructional taxonomy of I think and related expressions: accounting for the variability of complement-taking mental predicates. English Language and Linguistics 14(3): 300-427. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. I think and other complement-taking mental predicates: A case of and for constructional grammaticalization. Linguistics 49(2): 295-332.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Vries, Mark. 2003. Three-dimensional grammar. In Linguistics in the Netherlands, Leonie M.E.A. Cornips & Paula Fikkert (eds), 201-212. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wackernagel 1897, see Scheider 2007b: 38-39.
Wichmann, Anne. 2001. Spoken parentheticals. In A Wealth of English. Studies in Honour of Göran Kjellmer, Karin Aijmer (ed.), 177-193. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgiensis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wischer, Ilse. 2000. Grammaticalization versus lexicalization: 'Methinks' there is some confusion. In Pathways of Change. Grammaticalization in English [Studies in Language Companion Series 57], Olga, Fischer, Anette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds), 355-370. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ziv, Yael. 1985. Parentheticals and functional grammar. In Syntax and Pragmatics in Functional Grammar, A. Machteld Bolkestein, Caspar de Groot & J. Lachlan Mackenzie (eds), 181-199. Dordrecht: Foris. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (19)

Cited by 19 other publications

Crespo, Emilio
2025. 247Number Agreement of a Predicate in Singular with Two or More Coordinated Noun Phrases in Nominative in Homer. In Advances in Ancient Greek Linguistics, ► pp. 247 ff. DOI logo
Klumm, Matthias
2025. Peripheries and their internal structure: an empirical analysis of left- and right-peripheral sequences across written English discourse. Linguistics 63:5 ► pp. 1171 ff. DOI logo
Klumm, Matthias & Augustin Speyer
2025. Left and right peripheries in discourse: an introduction. Folia Linguistica 59:2 ► pp. 255 ff. DOI logo
Mustafa, Ozan & Gunther Kaltenböck
2025. The emergence of last I checked fragments: a story of shifting allegiance. Folia Linguistica 59:2 ► pp. 301 ff. DOI logo
Izutsu, Katsunobu & Mitsuko Narita Izutsu
2023. Highlighting beginning, end, or transition in-between. In Discourse Phenomena in Typological Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series, 227], ► pp. 295 ff. DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. Utterances without commitment. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 203 ff. DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. The grammar of dialogue. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 251 ff. DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. The Grammar of the Utterance, DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. Doing things with utterance grammar. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 135 ff. DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. Vocatives. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 51 ff. DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. Interjections and particles. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. Conclusions. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 299 ff. DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. Introduction. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. The expression of affect. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 157 ff. DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. A grammar for the utterance. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
Scivoletto, Giulio
2020. Semasiological cyclicity in the evolution of discourse markers. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 21:2 ► pp. 236 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Copyright Page. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. iv ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. General Preface. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. vii ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. List of Abbreviations. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. xi ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue