In:Embodiment in Latin Semantics
Edited by William Michael Short
[Studies in Language Companion Series 174] 2016
► pp. 237–268
Embodied historiography
Models for reasoning in Tacitus’ Annales
Published online: 11 May 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.174.09dev
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.174.09dev
This paper argues that although scholars recognize the use of rhetorical devices in historiography, they overlook a deeper connection that has the potential to enrich our understanding of the historians’ art and their potential impact on their audiences. Evaluating Latin narrative structured by embodied and extended metaphor, the author considers the rhetorical device of enargeia and evaluates its definition and use in terms of mental simulation. Exploring the possible role of embodied linguistic processing in the writing and reception of narrated experience, the author finds that historiography displays a narrative strategy centered on eliciting sensorimotor activity, and suggests that the narrative of Tacitus’ Annales “works” persuasively and affectively by exploiting this narrative strategy to create specific models for reasoning about historical events.
Keywords: Annales, enargeia, historiography, Latin, mental simulation, metaphor, narrative, Tacitus
References (129)
Armstrong, Paul. 2013. How Literature Plays with the Brain: The Neuroscience of Reading and Art. Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Aziz-Zadeh, Lisa, Wilson, Stephen, Rizzolatti, Giacomo, and Iacoboni, Marco. 2006. Congruent embodied representations for visually presented actions and linguistic phrases describing actions. Current Biology 16(18): 1818‒23.
Boroditsky, Lera & Prinz, Jesse. 2008. What thoughts are made of. In Embodied Grounding: Social, Cognitive, Affective, and Neuroscientific Approaches, Gün Semin & Eliot Smith (eds), 98‒115. Cambridge: CUP.
Brown, Truesdell. 1982. Herodotus’ portrait of Cambyses. Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte 31(4): 387‒403.
Buccino, Giovanni, Riggio, Lucia, Melli, Giorgia, Binkofski, Ferdinand, Gallese, Vittorio & Rizzolatti, Giacomo. 2005. Listening to action related sentences modulates the activity of the motor system: a combined TMS and behavioral study. Cognitive Brain Research 24(3): 355–63.
Caracciolo, Marco. 2013. Blind reading: Towards an enactivist theory of the reader’s imagination. In Stories and Minds: Cognitive Approaches to Literary Narrative, Lars Bernaerts, Dirk De Geest, Luc Herman & Bart Vervaeck (eds), 81‒105. Lincoln NB: University of Nebraska Press.
Cartledge, Paul. 2009. Gibbon and Tacitus. In The Cambridge Companion to Tacitus, Anthony Woodman (ed.), 269‒279. Cambridge: CUP.
Clark, Brian, Mahato, Niladri, Nakazawa, Masato, Law, Timothy & Thomas, James. 2014. The power of the mind: The cortex as a critical determinant of muscle strength/weakness. Journal of Neurophysiology 112(12): 3219‒26.
Cuthbert, Bruce, Vrana, Scott & Bradley, Margaret. 1991. Imagery: Function and physiology. Advances in Psychophysiology 4: 1‒42.
Damasio, Antonio. 1994. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York NY: Penguin Books.
Decety, Jean, Jeannerod, Marc, Germain, Marion & Pastene, Jorge 1991. Vegetative response during imagined movement is proportional to mental effort. Behavioral Brain Research 42(1): 1‒5.
Desai, Rutvik, Binder, Jeffrey, Conant, Lisa, Mano, Quintano & Seidenberg, Mark. 2011. The neural career of sensory-motor metaphors. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23(9): 2376‒2386.
Dominik, William. 1997. The style is the man: Seneca, Tacitus and Quintilian’s canon. In Roman Eloquence: Rhetoric in Society and Literature, 50‒68. London: Routledge.
Farah, Martha, Péronnet, Franck, Gonon, Marie & Giard, Marie. 1988. Electrophysiological evidence for a shared representation medium for visual images and visual percepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 117(3): 248‒257.
Feldherr, Andrew. 1998. Spectacle and Society in Livy’s History. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.
Feldman, Jerome. 2006. From Molecule to Metaphor: A Neural Theory of Language. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Finke, Ronald. 1980. Levels of equivalence in imagery and perception. Psychological Review 87: 113‒132.
Fischer, Martin & Zwaan, Rolf. 2008. Embodied language: A review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 61(6): 825‒50.
Fox, Peter, Pardo, José, Petersen, Stephen & Raichle, Marcus. 1987. Supplementary motor and premotor responses to actual and imagined hand movements with positron emission tomography. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 13: 14‒33.
Gallese, Vittorio & Lakoff, George. 2005. The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in reason and language. Cognitive Neuropsychology 22: 455‒479.
Gallese, Vittorio & Sinigaglia, Corrado. 2011. What is so special about embodied simulation? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13(11): 512‒19.
Gallese, Vittorio & Wojciehowski, Hannah. 2011. How stories make us feel: Towards an embodied narratology. California Italian Studies 2(1). <[URL]>
Gavrilov, Alexander. 1997. Techniques of reading in classical antiquity. Classical Quarterly 47(1): 56‒73.
Gibbs, Raymond. 2005a. Embodiment in metaphorical imagination. In Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language and Thinking, Diane Pecher & Rolf Zwaan (eds), 65‒92. Cambridge: CUP.
Gill, Christopher & Thomas Wiseman (eds). 1993. Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World. Exeter: University of Exeter Press.
Glenberg, Arthur. 2008. Towards the integration of bodily states, language, and action. In Embodied Grounding: Social, Cognitive, Affective, and Neuroscientific Approaches, Gün Semin & Eliot Smith (eds), 43‒70. Cambridge: CUP.
Glenberg, Arthur, Havas, David, Becker, Ray & Rinck, Michael. 2005. Grounding language in bodily states: The case for emotion. In Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language and Thinking, Diane Pecher & Rolf Zwaan (eds), 115‒28. Cambridge: CUP.
Glenberg, Arthur, Sato, Marc, Cattaneo, Luigi, Riggio, Lucia, Palumbo, Daniele & Buccino, Giovanni. 2008. Processing abstract language modulates motor system activity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 61(6): 905‒919.
Glenberg, Arthur & Gallese, Vittorio. 2012. Action-based language: A theory of language acquisition production and comprehension. Cortex 48(7): 905‒922.
Grant, Michael. 1995. Greek and Roman Historians: Information and Misinformation. New York NY: Routledge.
Green, Peter. 2006. Diodorus Siculus, Books 11-12.37. 1: Greek History, 480-431 BC–the Alternative Version. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.
Griffin, Miriam. 2009. Tacitus as a historian. In The Cambridge Companion to Tacitus, Anthony Woodman (ed.), 168‒83. Cambridge: CUP.
. 2007. Probing the entrails of the universe: Astrology as bodily knowledge in Manilius’ Astronomica
. In Ordering Knowledge in the Roman Empire, Jason König & Timothy Whitmarsh (eds), 229‒240. Cambridge: CUP.
. 2011. The tentacular mind: Stoicism, neuroscience, and the configurations of physical reality. In A Field Guide to a New Meta-Field: Bridging the Humanities-Neuroscience Divide, Barbara Stafford (ed.), 64‒83. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Hauk, Olaf., Johnsrude, Ingrid & Pulvermüller, Friedemann. 2004. Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron 41: 301‒307.
. 2010. Narrative theory after the second cognitive revolution. In Introduction to Cognitive Cultural Studies, Lisa Zunshine (ed.), 155‒175. Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Jeannerod, Marc. 1994. The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behavioral Brain Sciences 17: 187‒245.
. 2001. Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage 14(1): 103–109.
Kable, Joseph, Lease-Spellmeyer, Jessica & Chatterjee, Anjan. 2002. Neural substrates of action event knowledge. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 14: 795‒805.
Kaschak, Michael P., Jones, John L., Coyle, Jacqueline M. & Sell, Andrea. 2009. Language and body. In Beyond Decoding: The Behavioral and Biological Foundations of Reading Comprehension, Richard Wagner, Christopher Schatschneider & Caroline Phythian-Sense (eds), 3‒26. New York NY: Guilford.
Keitel, Elizabeth 1984. Principate and civil war in the Annals of Tacitus. American Journal of Philology 105(3): 306‒325.
Ker, James. 2004. Nocturnal writers in imperial Rome: The culture of lucubratio
. Classical Philology 99(3): 209‒242.
Klepp, Anne, Weissler, Hannah, Niccolai, Valentina, Terhalle, Anselm, Geisler, Hans & Schnitzler, Alfons. 2014. Neuromagnetic hand and foot motor sources recruited during action verb processing. Brain and Language 128(1): 41‒52.
Kosslyn, Stephen, Ball, Thomas & Reiser, Brian. 1978. Visual images preserve metric spatial information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 4(1): 47‒60.
Kosslyn, Stephen, Alpert, Nathaniel, Maljkovic, Vera, Weise, Steven & Chabris, Christopher. 1993. Visual mental imagery activates topographically organized visual cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 5: 263–287.
Kosslyn, Stephen & Thompson, William. 2000. Shared mechanisms in visual imagery and visual perception: Insights from cognitive science. In The Cognitive Neurosciences, Michael Gazzaniga (ed.), 975‒986. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2000. Metaphor and Emotion: Language, Culture, and Body in Human Feeling. Cambridge: CUP.
Kuzmičová, Anežka. 2013. The words and worlds of literary narrative. In Stories and Minds: Cognitive Approaches to Literary Narrative, Lars Bernaerts, Dirk De Geest, Luc Herman & Bart Vervaeck (eds), 107‒128. Lincoln NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Lakoff, George. 2008. The neural theory of metaphor. In The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, Raymond Gibbs (ed.), 17‒39. Cambridge: CUP.
Le Bihan, Denis, Turner, Robert, Zeffiro, Thomas, Cuénod, Charles-Andre, Jezzard, Peter & Bonnerot, Valerie. 1993. Activation of human primary visual cortex during visual recall: A magnetic resonance imaging study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 90: 11802‒11805.
Luce, T.J. 2012 Tacitus’ conception of historical change. In Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: Tacitus, Rhiannon Ash (ed.), 339‒356. Oxford: OUP.
Modell, Arnold. 2009. Metaphor: The bridge between feelings and knowledge. Psychoanalytic Inquiry 29(1): 6‒11.
Moles, John. 1993. Truth and untruth in Herodotus and Thucydides. In Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World, Christoper Gill & Thomas Wiseman (eds), 88‒121. Exeter: University of Exeter Press.
Montefusco, Lucia. 2005. ‘Enárgeia’ et ‘enérgeia’: l’Evidence d’une démonstration qui signifie les choses en acte, In Demonstrare: Voir et faire voir: Forme de la demonstration à Rome, Michèle Fruyt, Claude Moussy, Mireille Armisen-Marchetti & Gualtiero Calboli (eds), 43‒58. Toulouse: Presses Universitaires du Midi.
Morgan, John. 1993. Make-believe and make believe. In Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World, Christopher Gill & Thomas Wiseman (eds), 175‒229. Exeter: University of Exeter Press.
Oakley, Stephen. 2009. Style and language. In The Cambridge Companion to Tacitus, Anthony Woodman (ed.), 195‒211. Cambridge: CUP.
Pelling, Christopher. 2009. Tacitus’ personal voice. In The Cambridge Companion to Tacitus. A. Woodman (ed.), 147‒167. Cambridge: CUP.
. 2012. Tacitus and Germanicus. In Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: Tacitus, Rhiannon Ash (ed.), 281‒313. Oxford: OUP.
Porro, Carlo, Francescato, Maria Pia, Cettolo, Valentina, Diamond, Matthew, Baraldi, Patrizia, and Zuiani, Chiava, Bazzocchi, Massimo & Di Prampero, Pietro 1996. Primary motor and sensory cortex activation during motor performance and motor imagery. Journal of Neuroscience 16: 7688-7698.
Prinz, Jesse. 2002. Furnishing the Mind: Concepts and their Perceptual Basis. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
. 2005. Passionate thoughts: The emotional embodiment of moral concepts. In Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language and Thinking, Diane Pecher & Rolf Zwaan (eds), 93‒114. Cambridge: CUP.
Pulvermüller, Friedemann. 2005. Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6(7): 576‒582.
. 2008. Brain embodiment of category-specific semantic memory circuits. In Embodied Grounding: Social, Cognitive, Affective, and Neuroscientific Approaches, Gün Semin & Eliot Smith (eds), 71‒97. Cambridge: CUP.
Raposo, Ana, Moss, Helen, Stamatakis, Emmanuel & Tyler, Lorraine. 2009. Modulation of motor and premotor cortices by actions, action words and action sentences. Neuropsychologia 47(2): 388‒396.
Roth, Muriel, Decety, Jean, Raibaudi, Monica, Massarelli, Raphael, Delon-Martin, Chantal, Segebarth, Christoph, Morant, Stéphanie, Gemignani, Angelo, Décorps, Michel & Jeannerod, Marc. 1996. Possible involvement of primary motor cortex in mentally simulated movement. Neuroreport 7: 1280‒1284.
Schnitzler, Alfons, Salenius, Stephan, Salmelin, Riitta, Jousmäki, Veikko & Hari, Riita. 1997. Involvement of primary motor cortex in motor imagery. Neuroimage 6: 201‒208.
Schubert, Thomas, Waldzus, Sven & Seibt, Christa 2008. The embodiment of power and communalism in space and bodily contact. In Embodied Grounding: Social, Cognitive, Affective, and Neuroscientific Approaches, Gün Semin & Eliot Smith (eds), 160‒183. Cambridge: CUP.
Shepard, Robert. 1984. Ecological constraints on internal representation. Psychological Review 91: 417‒447.
. 2013. Getting to the truth: The “Wandering” metaphor of mistakenness in Roman culture. Arion 21(2): 139‒168.
Smiley, Charles. 1906.
Latinitas and Hellenismos
. Bulletin of the University of Wisconsin 143: 211‒271.
Tettamanti, Marco, Buccino, Giovanni, Saccuman, Maria, Gallese, Vittorio, Danna, Massimo, Scigo, Paola, Fazio, Ferruccio, Rizzolatti, Giacomo, Cappa, Stefano & Perani, Daniela. 2005. Listening to action-related sentences activates fronto-parietal motor circuits. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17(2): 273‒281.
Thelen, Esther, Schöner, Gregor, Scheier, Christian & Smith, Linda 2001. The dynamics of embodiment: A field theory of infant perservative reaching. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24: 1‒86.
Thibodeau, Paul & Boroditsky, Lera. 2011. Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PLoS ONE 6(2): e16782.
Walker, B. 1952. A study in incoherence: The first book of Tacitus’ Histories
. Classical Philology 71(1): 113‒118.
Webb, Ruth. 1997. Imagination and the arousal of the emotions in Greco-Roman rhetoric. In The Passions in Roman Thought and Literature, Susanna Braund & Christopher Gill (eds), 112‒27. Cambridge: CUP.
. 2009. Ekphrasis, Imagination and Persuasion in Ancient Rhetorical Theory and Practice. Burlington VT: Ashgate.
Wehbe, Leila, Murphy, Brian, Talukdar, Partha, Fyshe, Alona, Ramdas, Aaditya & Mitchell, Tom. 2014. Simultaneously uncovering the patterns of brain regions involved in different story reading subprocesses. PloS one 9(11).
Wheeldon, M.J. 1989. True stories: The reception of historiography in antiquity. In History as Text: The Writing of Ancient History, Averil Cameron (ed.), 33‒63. London: Duckworth.
Wiseman, Thomas. 1993. Lying historians: Seven types of mendacity. In Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World, Christopher Gill & Thomas Wiseman (eds), 122‒146. Exeter: University of Exeter Press.
. 2012. Nero’s alien capital. In Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: Tacitus, Rhiannon Ash (ed.), 315–336. Oxford: OUP.
Wunderlich, Silvia. 1944. Greek art and medicine. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 32(3): 324–331.
Yu, Ning. 2008. Metaphor from body and culture. In The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, Raymond Gibbs (ed.), 247‒261. Cambridge: CUP.
Yue, Guang & Cole, Kelly. 1992. Strength increases from the motor program. Journal of Neurophysiology 67: 1114–1123.
Zerubavel, Eviatar. 2003. Time Maps: Collective Memory and the Social Shape of the Past. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Zwaan, Rolf. 2004. The immersed experiencer: Towards an embodied theory of language comprehension. Psychology of Learning and Motivation 44: 35‒62.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
