In:Embodiment in Latin Semantics
Edited by William Michael Short
[Studies in Language Companion Series 174] 2016
► pp. 209–236
Embodiment in Latin technical texts
Published online: 11 May 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.174.08rob
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.174.08rob
In this chapter I analyze Latin textual representations of the engagements between body and world entailed in the technical tasks of laying out spaces in the landscape and orienting oneself within them, emphasizing how rhetorical techniques of enargeia or “vividness” give the reader a sense of being physically present in those spaces. Drawing principally on the works of the Roman surveyors and Frontinus’s De aquae ductu urbis Romae, I focus on the road and water networks, and on the surveyed landscapes of Roman settlements. I give particular attention to linguistic techniques that vividly render the manual activities used to reify these spaces, from the surveyor’s manipulation of his instruments to the creation and decoding of the landscape of boundary markers.
Keywords: directives, distributed cognition, enargeia, fictive motion, orientation, tacit knowledge
References (50)
Adam, Jean-Pierre. 1982. Groma et Chorobate. Mélanges de l’École française de Rome: Antiquité 94: 1003–29.
Ariño Gil, Enrique & Gurt, Josep. 2001. La inscripción catastral de Ilici. Ensayo de interpretación. Pyrenae: Revista de Prehistòria i Antiguitat de la Mediterrània Occidental 31-32: 223–26.
Benveniste, Émile. 1958. De la subjectivité dans le langage. Journal de Psychologie Normale et Pathologique 55: 257–265.
Campbell, Brian. 1996. Shaping the rural environment: Surveyors in ancient Rome. Journal of Roman Studies 86: 74–99.
Campbell, J.B. 2000. The Writings of the Roman Land Surveyors: Introduction, Text, Translation and Commentary. London: Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies.
Cavalieri-Manasse, Giuliana. 2000. Un document cadastral du complexe capitolin de Vérone. Dialogues d’Histoire Ancienne 26: 198–200.
Chinn, Christopher. 2007. Before your very eyes: Pliny Epistulae 5.6 and the ancient Theory of Ekphrasis. Classical Philology 102: 265–80.
Chouquer, Gérard & Favory, François. 2001. L’arpentage romain: Histoire des textes, droit, techniques. Paris: Errance.
Clark, Andy. 1997. Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
DeLaine, Janet. 1996.
De aquis suis? The ‘Commentarius’ of Frontinus’. In Les littératures techniques dans l’Antiquité romaine, Claude Nicolet (ed.), 117–45. Geneva: Fondation Hardt.
Dilke, Oswald. 1971. The Roman Land Surveyors: An Introduction to the Agrimensores. Newton Abbot: David and Charles.
Favory, François, Gonzalès, Antonio & Robin, Philippe. 1994. Témoignages antiques sur le bornage dans le monde romain. Revue archéologique du Centre de la France 33: 214–38.
Fowler, David & Taisbak, C. Marinus. 1999. Did Euclid’s circles have two kinds of radius? Historia Mathematica 26: 361–364.
Gargola, Daniel. 1995. Lands, Laws & Gods: Magistrates & Ceremony in the Regulation of Public Lands in Republican Rome. Chapel Hill NC: University of North Carolina Press.
. 2004. The ritual of centuriation. In Augusto augurio: Rerum humanarum et divinarum commentationes, Christoph Konrad (ed.), 123–48. Stuttgart: Steiner.
Gibson, Roy. 1998. Didactic poetry as ‘popular’ form: A study of imperatival expressions in Latin didactic verse and prose. In Form and Content in Didactic Poetry, Catherine Atherton (ed.), 67–98. Bari: Levante.
Giere, Ronald. 2007. Distributed cognition without distributed knowing. Social Epistemology 21: 313–320.
Gladigow, Burkhard. 1992.
Audi Juppiter, audite fines. Religionsgeschichtliche Einordnung von Grenzen, Grenzziehungen und Grenzbestätigungen. In Die Römische Feldmesskunst: interdisziplinäre Beiträge zu ihrer Bedeutung für die Zivilisationsgeschichte Roms, Okko Behrends & Luigi Capogrossi Colognesi (eds), 172–191. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Goldhill, Simon. 1994. The naïve and knowing eye: Ekphrasis and the culture of viewing in the Hellenistic world. In Art and Text in Ancient Greek Culture, Simon Goldhill & Robin Osborne (eds), 197–223. Cambridge: CUP.
Gorges, Jean-Gérard. 1993. Nouvelle lecture du fragment de Forma d’un territoire voisin de Lacimurga. Mélanges de la Casa de Velázquez 29: 7–23.
Guillaumin, Jean-Yves. 1994. Géométrie grecque et agrimensorique romaine. La science comme justification d’une idéologie. Dialogues d’Histoire Ancienne 20: 279–295.
Hine, Harry. 2009. Subjectivity and objectivity in Latin scientific and technical literature. In Authorial Voices in Greco-Roman Technical Writing, Liba Chaia Taub & Aude Doody (eds), 13–30. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.
Hübner, Wolfgang. 1992. Himmel und Erdvermessun. In Die Römische Feldmesskunst: interdisziplinäre Beiträge zu ihrer Bedeutung für die Zivilisationsgeschichte Roms, Okko Behrends & Luigi Capogrossi Colognesi (eds), 140–71. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Jansen, Carel & Pollmann, Monique. 2001. On round numbers: Pragmatic aspects of numerical expressions. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 8: 187–201.
Levinson, Stephen. 2003. Space in Language and Cognition: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity. Cambridge: CUP.
. 2012. Greek and Roman surveying and surveying instruments. In Ancient Perspectives: Maps and their Place in Mesopotamia, Egypt, Greece, and Rome, Richard Talbert (ed.), 129–62. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Marchello-Nizia, Christiane. 2006. From personal deixis to spatial deixis: The semantic evolution of demonstratives from Latin to French. In Space in Languages: Linguistic Systems and Cognitive Categories, Maya Hickmann & Stéphane Robert (eds), 103–20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Mayer, Marc & Olesti Vila, Oriol. 2001. La sortitio de Ilici. Del documento epigráfico al paisaje histórico. Dialogues d’Histoire Ancienne 27: 109–130.
Piganiol, André. 1962. Les documents cadastraux de la colonie romaine d’Orange. Paris: Centre national de la recherche scientifique.
Risselada, Rodie. 1993. Imperatives and Other Directive Expressions in Latin: A Study in the Pragmatics of a Dead Language. Amsterdam: Gieben.
. 2016. Technical Ekphrasis in Greek and Roman Science and Literature: The Written Machine between Alexandria and Rome. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sáez Fernández, Pedro. 1990. Estudio sobre una inscripción catastral colindante con Lacimurga. Habis 21: 205–228.
Von Staden, Heinrich. 1994. Author and authority: Celsus on the construction of a scientific self. In Tradición e Innovación de la Medicina latina de la Antigüedad y de la Alta Edad Media Manuel Enrique Vázquez Buján (ed.), 103–17. Santiago de Compostela: Servicio de Publicacións e Intercambio Científico da Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.
Svorou, Soteria. 1994. The Grammar of Space [Typological Studies in Language 25]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Torelli, Mario. 1966. Un templum augurale d’età repubblicana a Bantia. Rendiconti della Accademia di archeologia, lettere e belle arti 21: 293–315.
Varela, Francisco J., Thompson, Evan & Rosch, Eleanor. 1991. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Webb, Ruth. 2009. Ekphrasis, Imagination and Persuasion in Ancient Rhetorical Theory and Practice. Farnham: Ashgate.
Williams, Sandra & Power, Richard. 2013. Hedging and rounding in numerical expressions. Pragmatics & Cognition 21: 193–223.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Roby, Courtney Ann
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
