Cover not available

In:Embodiment in Latin Semantics
Edited by William Michael Short
[Studies in Language Companion Series 174] 2016
► pp. 141–176

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

The metaphorical structuring of kinship in Latin

 | EHESS, Paris – University of Siena
Published online: 11 May 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.174.06buc
In this paper, I analyze how concepts related to the domains of space and plants were used by Latin speakers to deliver their culturally specific understanding of (some aspects of) human kinship, in the light of the theory of conceptual metaphor. I go on to claim that analysis of the metaphorical layer of Latin lexicon of kinship can contribute to its “emic” description in ancient Rome, that is, framing it (as much as possible) in concepts near to the Romans’ own experience. First, I describe the contribution that the domains of space and plants makes to the metaphorical structuring of Roman ideas about kinship. Then, I move on to their interplay and to their interaction with Roman images of time, which appear to be ultimately responsible for some of the seemingly odd features of these metaphors. I conclude by trying to spell out some differences between modern and ancient elaborations of the tree as a cultural image.
References (54)
References
Bader, Françoise. 1962. La formation des composés nominaux du latin. Paris: Belles Lettres. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beltrami, Lucia. 1998. Il sangue degli antenati: Stirpe, adulterio e figli senza padre nella cultura romana. Bari: Edipuglia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benveniste, Émile. 1936. Liber et Liberi. Revue Des Études Latines 14: 51–8.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1965. Termes de parenté dans les langues indo-européennes. L’Homme 5(3–4): 5–16.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1969. Le Vocabulaire Des Institutions Indeo-européennes. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bettini, Maurizio. 1991. Anthropology and Roman Culture: Kinship, Time, Images of the Soul. Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. The Portrait of the Lover. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Affari di famiglia: La parentela nella letteratura e nella cultura antica. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bettini, Maurizio & Short, William. 2014. Introduzione. In Con i Romani. Antropologia della cultura antica, Maurizio Bettini & William Short (eds), 7–22. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boroditsky, Lera. 2000. Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition 75(1): 1–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology 43(1): 1–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boroditsky, Lera & Ramscar, Michael. 2002. The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science 13(2): 185–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bretin-Chabrol, Marine. 2012. L’arbre et la lignée: Métaphores végétales de la filiation et de l’alliance en latin classique. Grenoble: Jérôme Millon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brugman, Claudia & Lakoff, George. 1988. Cognitive Topology and Lexical Networks. In Lexical Ambiguity Resolution, Steven Small, Garrison Cottrell & Michael Tanenhaus (eds), 477–507. Palo Alto CA: Morgan Kaufmann. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bruns, Carl Georg.1887. Fontes iuris romani antiqui. Freiburg: Mohr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buccheri, Alessandro. 2012. Costruire l’umano in termini vegetali. Φύω e φύσις nella tragedia greca. I Quaderni del Ramo d’Oro Online 5: 137–65.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Casasanto, Daniel. 2010. Space for thinking. In Language, Cognition and Space: The State of the Art and New Directions, Vyvyan Evans & Paul Chilton (eds), 453–78. London: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Casasanto, Daniel & Boroditsky, Lera. 2008. Time in the mind: Using space to think about time. Cognition 106(2): 579–93. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul A. 2010. Introduction. In Language, Cognition and Space: The State of the Art and New Directions, Vyvyan Evans & Paul Chilton (eds), 1–18. London: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delbrück, Berthold. 1889. Die indogermanischen Verwandtschaftsnamen. Ein Beitrag zur vergleichenden Alterthumskunde. Lipsia: Hirzel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles & Guattari, Félix. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan. 2013. Language and Time. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan & Chilton, Paul. (eds). 2010. Language, Cognition and Space: The State of the Art and New Directions. London: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fayer, Carla. 1994. La familia romana. Rome: L’Erma di Bretschneider.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flower, Harriet. 1996. Ancestor Masks and Aristocratic Power in Roman Culture. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1983. Local knowledge. Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guastella, Gianni. 1985. La rete del sangue: simbologia delle relazioni e modelli dell’identità nella cultura romana. Materiali e Discussioni per l’Analisi dei Testi Classici 15: 49–123. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, Christopher, Jussen, Bernhard, Warren Sabean, David & Teuscher, Simon (eds). 2013. Blood and Kinship: Matter for Metaphor from Ancient Rome to the Present. New York NY: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klapisch-Zuber, Christiane. 2000. L’ombre des ancêtres: Essai sur l’imaginaire médiéval de la parenté. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2005. Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Language, Mind, and Culture: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Landau, Barbara, Dessalegn, Banchiamlack & Goldberg, Ariel. 2010. Language and space: Momentary interactions. In Language, Cognition and Space: The State of the Art and New Directions, Vyvyan Evans & Paul Chilton (eds), 51–78. London: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lentano, Mario. 2007. La prova del sangue: Storie di identità e storie di legittimità nella cultura latina. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lloyd, Geoffrey. 2007. Cognitive Variations. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lowe, Dunstan. 2010. The symbolic value of grafting in ancient Rome. Transactions of the American Philological Association 140: 461–88.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moore, Kevin. 2006. Space-to-time mappings and temporal concepts. Cognitive Linguistics 17(2): 199–244. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murphy, Gregory. 1996. On metaphoric representation. Cognition 60: 173–204. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Núñez, Rafael, Motz, Benjamin & Teuscher, Ursina. 2006. Time after time: The psychological reality of the ego-and time-reference-point distinction in metaphorical construals of time. Metaphor and Symbol 21(3): 133–46. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Núñez, Rafael & Sweetser, Eve. 2006. With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science 30(3): 401–50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosenberg, David & Grafton, Anthony. 2010. Cartographies of Time. A History of the Timeline. New York NY: Princeton Architectural Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schadt, Hermann. 1982. Die Darstellungen der Arbores consanguinitatis und der Arbores affinitatis: Bildschemata in juristischen Handschriften. Tübingen: Wasmuth.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Short, William. 2014. Metafora. In Con i Romani: Un’antropologia della cultura antica, Maurizio Bettini & William Short (eds), 329–52. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Latin Dē: A view from cognitive semantics. Classical Antiquity 32(2): 378–405. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomas, Yan. 1988. Le droit romain. Le traité des computs du jureconsulte Paul. In Le dossier occidentale de la parenté. Textes juridiques indésirables sur la généalogie, Pierre Legendre (ed.), 27–119. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth. 1975. Spatial expressions of tense and temporal sequencing: A contribution to the study of semantic fields. Semiotica 15(3): 207–230. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tyler, Andrea & Evans, Vyvyan. 2003. The Semantics of English Prepositions: Spatial Scenes, Embodied Meaning, and Cognition. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Violi, Patrizia. 1997. Significato ed esperienza. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Voci, Pasquale. 1982. Linee storiche del diritto ereditario romano I. ANRW 2(14): 391–448.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watson, Alan. 1971. The Law of Succession in the Later Roman Republic. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Buccheri, Alessandro, Irene De Felice, Chiara Fedriani & William M. Short
2021. Semantic analysis and frequency effects of conceptual metaphors of emotions in Latin. From a corpus-based approach to a dictionary of Latin metaphors. Journal of Latin Linguistics 20:2 ► pp. 163 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue