Cover not available

In:Embodiment in Latin Semantics
Edited by William Michael Short
[Studies in Language Companion Series 174] 2016
► pp. 115–140

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Ontological and orientational metaphors in Latin

Evidence from the semantics of feelings and emotions

 | University of Bergamo
Published online: 11 May 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.174.05fed
Ontological and orientational metaphors arise from general cognitive processes and rely on our embodied experience of the physico-spatial world, providing us with image schemas that we commonly exploit in order to interpret and express abstract notions in terms of spatial configurations. This is particularly true in the case of emotions and feelings, which are much less clearly defined than our bodily functions. Indeed, recurrent embodied patterns building bridges between spatial orientations and feelings occur in a great variety of languages. It has long been noted, for instance, that the vertical axis up vs. down offers the basis for portraying many experiential metaphors in terms of ‘happy/positive is up’, ‘sad/negative is down’. This paper shows that both ontological and orientational metaphorization is largely attested in this domain of experience in Latin, and provides corpus-based evidence for frequency and productivity effects and cross-linguistic comparisons that testify how the human body is a universal cognitive key to interpret and categorize emotions in modern as well as in ancient languages.
References (56)
References
Ameka, Felix. 1990. The grammatical packaging of experiencers in Ewe: A study in the semantics of syntax. Australian Journal of Linguistics 10: 139–181. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Babiniotis, George Demetrius. 2002. Lexikó tēs Néas Ellēnikḗs Glṓssas (Dictionary of the Modern Greek language). Athens: Centre of Lexicology.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakos, Ferenc. 1991. Román-magyar kéziszótár (Romanian-Hungarian dictionary). Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Becher, Jutta. 2003. Experiencer Constructions in Wolof. Hamburg: Universität Hamburg, Institut für Afrikanistik und Äthopistik.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar. 2004. The syntax of experiencers in the Himalayas. In Non Nominative Subjects [Typological Studies in Language 60], Peri Bhaskararao & Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), 77–111. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buarque de Holanda Ferreira, Aurélio. 1975. Novo dicionário da língua portuguesa. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cairns, Douglas. 1993. Aidôs: The Psychology and Ethics of Honour and Shame in Ancient Greek Literature. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Vêtu d’impudeur et enveloppé de chagrin. Le rôle des métaphores de “l’habillement” dans les concepts d’émotion en Grèce ancienne. In Les vêtements antiques: s’habiller, se déshabiller dans les mondes anciens, Florence Gherchanoc & Valérie Huet (eds), 175–88. Paris: Errance.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Casasanto, Daniel. 2013. Experiential origins of mental metaphors: Language, culture, and the body. In The Power of Metaphor: Examining Its Influence on Social Life, Mark Landau, Michael Robinson & Brian Meier (eds), 249–268. Washington DC: American Psychological Association Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Casasanto, Daniel & Dijkstra, Katinka. 2010. Motor action and emotional memory. Cognition 115(1): 179–185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clausner Timothy & Croft, William. 1997. Productivity and schematicity in metaphors. Cognitive Science 21: 247–282. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. Domains and image schemas. Cognitive Linguistics 10(1): 1–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William & Cruse, Alan. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deignan, Alice. 2005. Metaphor and Corpus Linguistics [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dewell, Robert. 2005. Dynamic patterns of containmnt. In From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics, Beate Hampe & Joseph Grady (ed.), 369–394. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ernout, Alfred & Meillet, Antoine. 1959. Dictionnaire etymologique de la langue latine. Histoire des mots. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. 2004. Experiencer objects in Iwaidjan languages (Australia). In Non nominative subjects [Typological Studies in Language 60], Peri Bhaskararao & Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), 169–192. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fedriani, Chiara. 2011. Experiential metaphors in Latin: Feelings were containers, movements and things possessed. Transactions of the Philological Society 109(3): 307–326. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Experiential Constructions in Latin. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fedriani, Chiara, Manzelli, Gianguido & Ramat, Paolo. 2013. Gradualness in contact-induced grammatical replication: The case of the abstract possession construction in the Circum-Mediterranean area. In Synchrony and Diachrony: A Dynamic Interface [Studies in Language Companion Series 133], Anna Giacalone Ramat, Caterina Mauri & Piera Molinelli (eds), 391–418. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
García Jurado, Francisco. 2000. Las ‘metáforas de la vida cotidiana’ en latín y su proyección etimológica en castellano. In Cien años de investigación semántica, de Michel Breal a la actualidad: Actas del Congreso Internacional de Semántica, Vol. 2, José Manuel Oliver Frade (ed.), 1571–1584. Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
García Jurado, Francisco & López Gregoris, Rosario. 1995. Las ‘metáforas de la vida cotidiana’ en el lenguaje plautino como procedimiento de caracterización de los personajes. SIFC 13: 233–245.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond. 2005. Emobodiment and Cognitive Science. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond & Colston, Herbert. 1995. The cognitive psychological reality of image schemas and their transformations. Cognitive Linguistics 6: 347–78. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hampe, Beate. 2005. Image schemas in cognitive linguistics. In From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics, Beate Hampe & Joseph Grady (eds), 1–12. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 1997. Cognitive Foundations of Grammar. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark & Rohrer, Tim. 2007. We are live creatures: Embodiment, American pragmatism, and the cognitive organism. In Body, Language, and Mind, Vol. 1, Jordan Zlatev, Tom Ziemke, Roz Frank & René Dirven (eds), 17–54. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kavaleto-Petrova, Margarita, Todorov, Simeon, Bertoli-Simeonova, Marija & Tonkin, Ivan. 1992. Bălgarsko-italianski rečnik. Sofija: Nauka i izkustvo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koltay-Kastner, Jenő. 1963. Magyar-olasz szótár (Hungarian-Italian dictionary). Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Konstan, David. 2006. The Emotions of the Ancient Greeks: Studies in Aristotle and Classical Literature. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kovalev, Vladimir. 1995. Russo, Russkij. Dizionario russo italiano, italiano russo. Bologna: Zanichelli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2000. Metaphor and Emotion: Language, Culture and Body in Human Body. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 1. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 2. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lichtenberk, Frantisek. 1985. Possessive constructions in Oceanic languages and Proto-Oceanic. In Austronesian Linguistics at the 15th Pacific Science Congress, Andrew Pawley & Lois Carrington (eds), 93–140. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics Series C.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leka, Ferdinand & Simoni, Zef. 1996. Dizionario albanese-italiano. Fjalor shqip-italisht, Tiranë: Çabej / Besa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nikiforidou, Kiki. 1991. The meanings of the genitive: A case study in semantic structure and semantic change. Cognitive Linguistics 2(2): 149–205. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Padel, Ruth. 1992. In and Out of the Mind: Greek Images of the Tragic Self. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prandi, Michele. 2012. A plea for Living Metaphors: Conflictual Metaphors and Metaphorical Swarms. Metaphor and Symbol 27(2): 148–170. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Redhouse, James. 1994[2003]. Redhouse büyük elsözlüğü. İngilizce-Türkçe. Türkçe-İngilizce. The Larger Redhouse Portable Dictionary. English-Turkish, Turkish-English, On Sekizinci Baskı. İstanbul: SEV Matbaalacılık ve Yayıncılık Eğitim.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinha, Chris & De López, Kristine Jensen. 2000. Language, culture and the embodiment of spatial cognition. Cognitive Linguistics 11(1-2): 17–41.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Short, William. 2012. Latin De: A view from cognitive semantics. Classical Antiquity 32(2): 378–405. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
‪Stafford, Emma & Herrin, Judith (eds). 2005. Personification in the Greek World: ‪From Antiquity to Byzantium. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2006. Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy. In Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy, Anatol Stefanowitsch & Stefan T. Gries (eds), 1–16. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tyler, Andrea & Evans, Vyvyan. 2003. The Semantics of English Prepositions: Spatial Scenes, Embodied Meaning, and Cognition. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verma, Manindra, Mohanan, Karuvannur Puthanveettil & Verma Mahendra (eds). 1991. Experiencer Subjects in South Asian Languages. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wheeler, Max, Yates, Alan & Dols, Nicolau. 1999. Catalan. A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1992. Semantics, Culture and Cognition: Universal Human Concepts in Culture-Specific Configurations. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. Emotions Across Languages and Cultures: Diversity and Universals. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yonge, Charles. 1877. Cicero’s Tusculan Disputations. New York NY: Harper.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Jiménez López, M. Dolores
2024. «Y el teatro cayó en lágrimas»: colocaciones con (ἐμ-)πίπτω en griego antiguo. Emerita 92:1 ► pp. 1287 ff. DOI logo
Shan, Weijia & Zhengjun Lin
2024. The analysis of orientational metaphor of ‘Zhōng’ (中) in Chinese traditional classic The Doctrine of the Mean . International Journal of Language and Culture 11:2 ► pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
Tur, Cristina
2024. Concepts that fit in a (Roman) hand. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 11:1 ► pp. 158 ff. DOI logo
Tur, Cristina
2022. Metonimias y metáforas conceptuales con manus en el teatro latino. Emerita 90:1 ► pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Berno, Francesca Romana
2023. Roman Luxuria, DOI logo
Buccheri, Alessandro, Irene De Felice, Chiara Fedriani & William M. Short
2021. Semantic analysis and frequency effects of conceptual metaphors of emotions in Latin. From a corpus-based approach to a dictionary of Latin metaphors. Journal of Latin Linguistics 20:2 ► pp. 163 ff. DOI logo
Jiménez Martínez, María Isabel
2020. El movimiento como metáfora. Colocaciones con los verbos de movimiento venio e incido en latín. Nova Tellus 38:2 ► pp. 177 ff. DOI logo
Huang, Wen-Yi & Wen-yu Chiang
2018. The kaleidoscope of divine images. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 5:1 ► pp. 155 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue