Cover not available

In:Embodiment in Latin Semantics
Edited by William Michael Short
[Studies in Language Companion Series 174] 2016
► pp. 15–56

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

A matter of perspective

Aspect, deixis, and textual exploitation in the prototype semantics of eo and venio

 | University of Pisa
Published online: 11 May 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.174.02nut
Eo and venio, Latin’s primary motion verbs, are traditionally interpreted referring to an aspectual differentiation (telic venio vs. non-telic eo). The analysis of preclassical texts, however, show traces of an embryonic change towards a deictic-oriented use. Venio, in particular, displays prototypical instances centered around telicity vs. less typical occurrences governed by a deictic principle. Cognitive and pragmatic phenomena such as the interaction between spatial and temporal deixis or an ego-perspective appear to be relevant within this process, where aspectual or deictic orientations turn out to be functional in terms of textual exploitation. The comprehension of these features can account for the emergence, in Classical Latin, of a new eo – venio polarization where deixis progressively plays a pivot role.
References (56)
References
Baldi, Philip. 2006. Towards a history of the manner of motion parameter in Greek and Indo-European. In Fonologia e tipologia lessicale nella storia della lingua greca: Atti del VI Incontro Internazionale di Linguistica Greca (Bergamo, settembre 2005), Pierluigi Cuzzolin & Maria Napoli (eds), 13–31. Milan: FrancoAngeli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bally, Charles. 1926. L’expression des idées de sphère personnelle et de solidarieté dans les langues indo-européennes. In Festschrift Louis Gauchat, Franz Fankhauser & Jakob Jud (eds), 68–78. Aarau: Sauerländer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bennet, Charles. 1910. Syntax of Early Latin. Boston MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Botne, Robert. 2005. Cognitive schemas and motion verbs: COMING and GOING in Chindali (Eastern Bantu). Cognitive Linguistics 16(1): 43–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bourdin, Philippe. 1997. On goal-bias across languages: Modal, configurational and orientational parameters. In Typology, Prototypes, Items Orderings and Universals, Bohumil Palek (ed.), 185–218. Prague: Charles University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. When come and go go necessive . In ‘Come’ and ‘Go’ off the Beaten Grammaticalization Path, Maud Devos & Jenneke van der Wal (eds), 103–164. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brachet, Jean Paul. 2000. Recherches sur les préverbes dē- et ex- du latin. Brussels: Latomus.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope. 2006. A sketch of the grammar of space in Tzeltal. In Grammars of Space, Stephen Levinson & David Wilkins (eds), 230–72. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chevalier, Jean-Claude. 1976. Sur l’idée d’aller et de venir et sa traduction linguistique en espagnol et en français. Bulletin Hispanique 78: 254–312. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corominas, Joan & Pascual, Josè Antonio. 1980–1983. Diccionario critico etimológico castellano e hispánico. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cuzzolin, Pierluigi. 2010. How to move towards somebody in Plautus’ comedies. Some remarks on the adverb obviam . In Studies in Classical Linguistics in Honor of Philip Baldi, Richard Page & Aaron Rubin (eds), 7–20. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Devos, Maud & van der Wal, Jenneke. 2014. Introduction. In ‘Come’ and ‘Go’ off the beaten grammaticalization path, Maud Devos & Jenneke van der Wal (eds), 1–18. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(eds). 2014. ‘Come’ and ‘Go’ off the beaten grammaticalization path. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Di Meola, Claudio. 1994. Kommen und gehen. Eine kognitiv-liguistische Untersuchung der Polysemie deiktischer Bewegungsverben. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duchan, Judith, Bruder, Gail & Hewitt, Lynne (eds). 1995. Deixis in Narrative: A Cognitive Science Perspective. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ernout, Alfred. 1954. Aspects du vocabulaire latin. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles. 1966. Deictic categories in the semantics of come. Foundations of Language 2: 219–27.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1971. Towards a theory of deixis. University of Hawaii Working papers on Linguistics 3(4): 219–42.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1975. Santa Cruz Lectures on Deixis 1971. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gathercole, Virginia. 1977. A study of the comings and goings of the speakers of four languages: Spanish, Japanese, English, and Turkish. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics 2: 61–94.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haverling, Gerd 2010. Actionality, tense, and viewpoint. In New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax, Vol. 2: Constituent Syntax: Adverbial Phrases, Adverbs, Mood, Tense, Pierluigi Cuzzolin & Philip Baldi (eds), 277–523. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hewson, John & Bubenik, Vit (eds). 1997. Tense and Aspect in Indo-European Languages. Theory, Typology, Diachrony [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 145]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hewson, John. 1997a. The Latin verbal system. In Hewson & Bubenik (eds), 189–208. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997b. From Latin to Modern Romance . In Hewson & Bubenik (eds), 314–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hofmann, Johan Baptist. 1926. Beiträge zur Kenntnis des Vulgärlateins. Indogermanische Forschungen 43: 80–122. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hofmann, Johan-Baptist & Szantyr, Anton. 1965. Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul. 1979. Aspect and foregrounding in discourse. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 12: Discourse and Syntax, Talmy Givon (ed.), 213–41. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul & Traugott, Elisabeth. 2003. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Imai, Shingo. 2009, Spatial Deixis: How Finely Do Languages Divide Space? Saarbrücken: Müller.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1971. Shifters, verbal categories, and the Russian verb. In Selected Writings, Vol. 2, 130–147. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Létoublon, Françoise. 1985. Il allait, pareil à la nuit. Les verbes de mouvement en grec: Supplétisme et aspect verbale. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen 2004. Deixis. In The Handbook of Pragmatics, Laurence Horn & Gregor Ward (eds), 97–121. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. The language of space in Yélî Dnye. In Levinson & Wilkins (eds), 157–205. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen & Wilkins, David (eds). 2006, Grammars of Space. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Patterns in the data: Towards a semantic typology of spatial description. In Levinson & Wilkins (eds), 512–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewandowski, Wojciech. 2007. Toward a Comparative Analysis of Coming and Going Verbs in Spanish, German and Polish. MA thesis, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Löfstedt, Einar. 1933. Syntactica. Studien und Beiträge zur historischen Syntax des Lateins, II: Syntaktisch-Stilistische Gesichtspunkte und Probleme. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, George A. & Johnson-Laird, Philip N. 1976. Language and Perception. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nuti, Andrea. In press. Between aspect and deixis: vado in Classical Latin and the evolution of motion verbs. Proceedings of the 18th International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics, Toulouse, 8-13 June 2015.
Oldsjö, Fredrik. 2001. Tense and Aspect in Caesar's Narrative. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Orlandini, Anna & Poccetti, Paolo. 2011. La référence spatio-temporelle et métalinguistique des verbes de mouvement en latin et leurs évolutions romanes. In Espace et temps en latin, Claude Moussy (ed.), 25–45. Paris: Presses de l’université Paris-Sorbonne.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pederson, Eric. 2006. Spatial language in Tamil. In Levinson & Wilkins (eds), 400–436. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinkster, Harm. 1990. Latin Syntax and Semantics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ricca, Davide. 1989. Gli avverbi deittici di luogo in Platone e Aristofane. Lingua e stile 24(1): 57–88.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993. I verbi deittici di movimento in Europa: Una ricerca interlinguistica. Florence: La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosén, Hannah. 2000. Preclassical and Classical Latin precursors of Romance verb-stem suppletion. Indogermanische Forschungen 105: 271‒83.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schlyter, Suzanne. 1979. Le verbe allemand kommen et ses correspondances en français. Moderna Språka 73: 215–67.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stolova, Natalya. 2015a. From satellite-framed Latin to verb-framed Romance: Late Latin as an intermediate stage. In Latin vulgaire, latin tardif, Roger Wright (ed.), 253–62. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. III: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, Timoty Shopen (ed.), 57–149. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elisabeth. 2010. (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 29–71. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vetter, Emil. 1957. Ire und fuisse . In MNHMEΣ XAPIN. Gedenkschrift P. Kretschmer, Vol. 2, Heinz Kronasser (ed.), 194–8. Wiesbaden-Wien: Harrassowitz Hollinek.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilkins, David & Hill, Deborah. 1995. When “go” means “come”: Questioning the basicness of basic motion verbs. Cognitive Linguistics 6(2-3): 209–259. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Hutchinson, G. O.
2020. Motion in Classical Literature, DOI logo
Hutchinson, G.O.
2025. 47Repeat, Remember: Ritual and Literature (Horace; Sappho, Alcaeus; Homer, Sophocles, Epicurus, Callimachus, Vergil). In Memory, Ritual, and Identity in Ancient Greece and Rome, ► pp. 47 ff. DOI logo
Nuti, Andrea
2016. Between aspect and deixis: Vado in Classical Latin and the evolution of motion verbs. Pallas :102 ► pp. 69 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue