Cover not available

In:Language Contact and Change in the Americas: Studies in honor of Marianne Mithun
Edited by Andrea L. Berez-Kroeker, Diane M. Hintz and Carmen Dagostino
[Studies in Language Companion Series 173] 2016
► pp. 249–272

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Language documentation and historical linguistics

 | University of Hawai‘i Manoa
Published online: 19 April 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.173.11cam
This paper examines the relationship between language documentation, especially documentation of endangered languages, and historical linguistics. It address the questions, why is language documentation important to historical linguistics? and what can historical linguistics contribute to language documentation? Several ways in which the two are interconnected, mutually supportive, and together contribute to linguistics generally are discussed, illustrated by examples from a number of indigenous languages of the Americas.
References (52)
References
Bellwood, Peter. 2001. Early agriculturalist population diasporas? Farming, languages, and genes. Annual Review of Anthropology 30: 181-207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Farmers, foragers, languages, genes: The genesis of agricultural societies. In Examining the Farming/Language Dispersal Hypothesis, Peter Bellwood & Colin Renfrew (eds), 17-28. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1925. On the sound system of Central Algonquian. Language 1: 130-56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1928. A note on sound-change. Language 4: 99-100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1933. Language. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1946. Algonquian. In Linguistic Structures of Native America [Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology 6], Harry Hoijer (ed.), 85-129. New York: The Viking Fund.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blust, Robert. 1990. Summary report: Linguistic change and reconstruction methodology in the Austronesian language family. In Linguistic Change and Reconstruction Methodology, Philip Baldi (ed.), 133-54. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle. 1985. The Pipil Language of El Salvador. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. Linguistic reconstruction and unwritten languages. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Ronald E. Asher & James M.Y. Simpson (eds), 3475-80. London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. On sound change and challenges to regularity. In The Comparative Method Reviewed: Regularity and Irregularity in Language Change, Mark Durie & Malcolm Ross (eds), 72-89. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. What drives linguistic diversity and language spread? In Examining the Farming/Language Dispersal Hypothesis, Peter Bellwood & Colin Renfrew (eds), 49-63. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Historical Linguistics: An Introduction, 3rd edn. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, and Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle & Grondona, Verónica. 2010. Who speaks what to whom?: Multilingualism and language choice in Misión La Paz – A unique case. Language in Society 39: 1-30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Linguistic acculturation in Nivaclé (Chulupí) and Chorote. International Journal of American Linguistics 78: 335-67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle & Muntzel, Martha. 1989. The structural consequences of language death. In Investigating Obsolescence: Studies in Language Death, Nancy Dorian (ed.), 181-96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle & Poser, William J. 2008. Language Classification: History and Method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, Nick. 2010. Dying Words: Endangered Languages and What They Have to Tell Us. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. & Wilson, Robert. 1971. Convergence and creolization: A case from the Indo-Aryan/Dravidian border in India. In Pidginization and Creolization of Languages, Dell Hymes (ed.), 151–67. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haas, Mary R. 1941. Tunica. (Extract from Handbook of American Indian Languages, Vol. IV.) New York NY: J.J. Augustin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1946. A grammatical sketch of Tunica. In Linguistic Structures of Native America [Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology 6], Harry Hoijer (ed.), 337-66. New York: The Viking Fund.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1950. Tunica texts. University of California Publications in Linguistics 6: 1-174.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1953. Tunica dictionary. University of California Publications in Linguistics 6: 175-332.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1969. The Prehistory of Languages [Janua Linguarum, Series Minor 57]. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hale, Ken. 1998. On endangered languages and the importance of linguistic diversity. In Endangered Languages: Current Issues and Future Prospects, Lenore Grenoble & Lindsay Whaley (eds), 192-216. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harrison, K. David. 2007. When Languages Die: The Extinction of the World’s Languages and Erosion of Human Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heaton, Raina. 2013. Active-stative agreement in Tunica. Paper presented at the annual Linguistic Society of America meeting.
Hetzron, Robert. 1997. The Semitic languages. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus. 1998. Documentary and descriptive linguistics. Linguistics 36: 161-95. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Language documentation: What is it and what is it good for? In Essentials of Language Documentation, Jost Gippert, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann, & Ulrike Mosel (eds), 1-30. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Linguistic data types and the interface between language documentation and description. Language Documentation and Conservation 6: 187-207. <[URL]>Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles F. 1948. Implications of Bloomfield's Algonquian studies. Language 24: 117-31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change: Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Principles of Linguistic Change: Cognitive and Cultural Factors. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leem, Knud. 1748. En Lappisk grammatica, efter den dialect, som bruges af Field-Lapperne udi Porsanger-Fjorden, samt et register over de udi samme grammatica anførte obervationers indhold. Copenhagen: Gottman Friederich Risel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1768-81. Lexicon Lapponicum bipartitum: Lapponico-Danica-Latinum & Danico-Latino-Lappinicum, cum indice Latino. Vol. 1: Trondheim, Vol. 2: Copenhagen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lincoln, Peter C. 1979. Dual-lingualism: Passive bilingualism in action. Te Reo 22: 65-72.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maffi, Luisa. 2005. Linguistic, cultural, and biological diversity. Annual Review of Anthropology 29: 599-617. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine & Cohen, Marcel. 1924. Les langues du monde [Collection Linguistique 16]. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nadkarni, Mangesh V. 1975. Bilingualism and syntactic change in Konkani. Language 51: 672‑83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nettle, Daniel & Romaine, Suzanne. 2000. Vanishing Voices: The Extinction of the World’s Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Powell, John Wesley. 1891. Indian linguistic families of America north of Mexico. Seventh annual report, Bureau of American Ethnology, 1-142. Washington DC: Government Printing Office. Reprinted 1966, in: Franz Boas: Introduction to Handbook of American Indian languages; J.W. Powell: Indian Linguistic Families of America North of Mexico, Preston Holder (ed.). Lincoln NB: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rask, Rasmus K. 1818. Undersøgelse om det gamle nordiske eller Islandiske sprogs oprindelse. Copenhagen: Gyldendal. English translation by Niels Ege, 1993, Investigations of the Origin of the Old Norse or Icelandic Language [Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Copenhague 26]. Copenhagen: The Linguistic Circle of Copenhagen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rehg, Kenneth L. 2007. The language documentation and conservation initiative at the University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa. Documenting and revitalizing Austronesian languages. In Language Documentation and Conservation, Special Publication No. 1, Documenting and Revitalizing Austronesian Languages, D. Victoria Rau & Margaret Florey (eds), 13-24.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Renfrew, Colin. 1996. Language families and the spread of farming. In The Origins and Spread of Agriculture and Pastoralism in Eurasia, David R. Harris (ed.), 70–92. London: University College London Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rhodes, Richard, Grenoble, Lenore A., Berge, Anna, & Radetzky, Paula. 2007. Adequacy of Documentation. (A preliminary report to the CELP.) Linguistic Society of America Committee on Endangered Languages and their Preservation.
Sajnovics, Jo[h]annis [János]. 1770. Demonstratio idioma Ungarorum et Lapponum idem esse. First edition 1770 Copenhagen: Typis Collegi societatis Iesu; second edition 1770 Trnava (Tyrnau), Hungary. Photolithic reproduction of Second edition 1968, Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.), [Ural and Altaic Series 91]. Bloomington IN: Indiana University; The Hague: Mouton. German translation 1972, by M. Ehlers. Wiesbaden: Harassowitz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1913, 1915-1919. Southern Paiute and Nahuatl: A study in Uto-Aztecan. Journal de la Société des Américanists de Paris, Part 1, 10: 379-425, Part 2, 11: 433-88. Part 2 also printed 1915 American Anthropologist 17: 98-120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1931. The concept of phonetic law as tested in primitive languages by Leonard Bloomfield. In Methods in Social Science: A Case Book, Stuart A. Rice (ed.), 297-306. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press. Reprinted 1949, in: Selected Writings of Edward Sapir in Language, Culture, and Personality, David Mandelbaum (ed.), 73-82. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stipa, Günter Johannes. 1990. Finnisch-ugrische Sprachforschung. Helsinki: Finno-Ugric Society (Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swanton, John R. 1921. The Tunica language. International Journal of American Linguistics 2: 1-39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Terraza, Jimena. 2008. Gramática del Wichí: Fonología y Morfosintaxis. PhD dissertation, Université du Québec à Montréal.
Woodbury, Anthony. 2010. Language documentation. In The Cambridge Handbook of Endangered Languages, Peter Austin & Julia Sallabank (eds), 159-186. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Yang, Yike
2025. HKNSC: A Dynamic Bilingual Narrative Speech Corpus from Hong Kong. Journal of Open Humanities Data 11 DOI logo
Bowern, Claire, Margaret Thomas, Andrew Garrett, James Kirby, Wilkinson Daniel Wong Gonzales, Tamisha L. Tan, Terttu Nevalainen, Patience Epps & Don Daniels
2024. Diachrony and Diachronica . Diachronica 41:4 ► pp. 556 ff. DOI logo
Rhee, Seongha
2023. Intertwined grammaticalization, degrammaticalization, and pragmaticalization: The case of ppwun ‘share’ in Korean. Lingua 291 ► pp. 103559 ff. DOI logo
Lewis, M. Paul
2022. Promoting Linguistic Human Rights Through Language Documentation. In The Handbook of Linguistic Human Rights, ► pp. 613 ff. DOI logo
Ciucci, Luca
2021. From Fieldwork to Reconstruction: Historical Issues in Hotspots of Linguistic Diversity*. Studia Linguistica 75:2 ► pp. 165 ff. DOI logo
Szeverényi, Sándor
2021. Proceedings of the 5th Mikola Conference [Proceedings of the 5th Mikola Conference, 54], ► pp. 55 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue