In:Adverbs: Functional and diachronic aspects
Edited by Karin Pittner, Daniela Elsner and Fabian Barteld
[Studies in Language Companion Series 170] 2015
► pp. 207–238
Comparative adverb syntax
A cartographic approach
Published online: 24 September 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.170.09lae
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.170.09lae
In this paper I investigate the neutral structure of the Mittelfeld in Germanic (mainly German) and Romance (mainly French) languages following the cartographic approach (Cinque 1999, 2005, 2010; Kayne 1994, 2005; Cinque & Rizzi 2008; Laenzlinger 2011). Given the full VP-evacuation condition (Laenzlinger & Soare 2005a/b), all arguments, whether DPs or PPs, are probed out of the vP and reach their Case- or P-related position inside the Mittelfeld (Kayne 2002; Cinque 2010). Adverbs externally-merge as ordered specifiers of semantico-functional projections given Cinque’s (1999) hierarchy. Non-pronominal arguments may float among adverbs depending on their nature (subject, DP-object, PP-object) and their informational status. As for DP/PP adjuncts (the so-called adverbials), they merge in a domain higher than that of object arguments (Schweikert 2005). Given these assumptions I will show that Cinque’s (2010) left-right asymmetry holds for the derivational structure of the Mittelfeld when comparing V-final configurations (German) with V-initial configurations (French). For instance, if we take an adjunct (a locative adverbial), an object argument, a modal adverb and a manner adverb, the most neutral order is Adverbmodal < Adjunct < Argument < Adverbmanner < V < Aux in V+Aux-final configurations (e.g. German), while it is Aux < Adverbmodal < V < Adverbmanner < Argument < Adjunct in Aux+V-initial configurations (e.g. in French). I will further show that object arguments and adjuncts, like adverbs, follow a basic hierarchical order depending on their formal and/or semantic properties (Time > Loc > Manner > Dative argument > Accusative argument > PP-argument, respectively). Some reordering is possible based on subtle properties of informational structure and involves derivational devices such as pied-piping and remnant movement.
References (65)
Aboh, Enoch. 2007. Information structuring begins with the numeration. Ms, ACLC, Universiteit van Amsterdam.
Alexiadou, Artemis & Elena Anagnostopoulou. 2001. The subject in situ generalization, and the role of Case in driving computations. Linguistic Inquiry 32: 193–231.
Belletti, Adriana. 1990. Generalized Verb Movement: Aspects of Verb Syntax. Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier.
. 1999. Italian/Romance clitics: Structure and derivation. In Clitics in the Languages of Europe, Henk van Riemsdijk (ed.), 543–579. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. 2001. Inversion as focalization. In Subject Inversion in Romance and the Theory of Universal Grammar, Aafke C.J. Hulk & Jean-Yves Pollock (eds), 60–90. Oxford: OUP.
. 2004a. Aspects of the low IP Area. In The Structure of IP and CP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol.2, Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 16–51. Oxford: OUP.
Cardinaletti, Anna. 2004. Towards a cartography of subject positions. In The Structure of IP and CP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 2, Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 115–165. Oxford: OUP.
Choi, Hye-Won. 1999. Optimizing Structure in Context: Scrambling and Information Structure. Stanford CA: CSLI.
. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The Framework. In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds), 89–155. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael J. Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1994. On the evidence for partial N movement in the Romance DP. In Paths Towards Universal Grammar, Cinque Guglielmo, Jan Koster, Jean-Yves Pollock, Liugi Rizzi,& Raffaella Zanuttini (eds.) 85–110. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.
. 2002. Complement and adverbial PPs: Implications for clause structure. Talk given at GLOW 25, Amsterdam, April 10.
. 2010. Word order typology. A change of perspective. In Proceedings of the TADWO Conference, Michelle Sheehan & Glenda Newton (eds). Oxford: OUP. <[URL]>
Cinque, Guglielmo & Rizzi, Luigi. 2008. The cartography of syntactic structures [CISCL Working Papers] StIL Vol.2. Also in The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds), 51–65. Oxford: OUP, 2010.
Frey, Werner. 2003. Syntactic conditions on adjunct classes. In Modifying Adjuncts [Interface Explorations 4], Ewald Lang, Claudia Maienborn & Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen (eds), 163–209. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Grewendorf, Gunter & Sabel, Joachim. 1999. Scrambling in German and Japanese: Adjunction versus multiple specifiers. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17: 1–65.
Grohmann, Kleanthes K. 2003. Prolific Domains. On the Anti-Locality of Movement Dependencies [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 64]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Haegeman, Liliane. 2006. Argument fronting in English, Romance ClLD and left periphery. In Crosslinguistic Research in Syntax and Semantics: Negation, Tense and Clausal Architecture, Raffaela Zanuttini, Hector Campos, Elena Herburger & Paul H. Portner (eds), 27–52. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
. 2012. Adverbial Clauses, Main Clause Phenomena, and Composition of the Left Periphery: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol 8. Oxford: OUP.
. 2002. On some prepositions that look DP-internal: English of and French de
. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 1: 71–116.
. 2008. Antisymmetry and the lexicon. Ms, New York University. <[URL]>
Koopman, Hilda & Szabolcsi, Anna. 2000. Verbal Complexes [Current Studies in Linguistics 34]. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Laenzlinger, Christopher. 1998. Comparative Studies in Word Order Variations. Adverbs, Pronouns And German Clause Structure. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
. 2000. More on adverb syntax. In Adverbs and Adjunction [ZAS Linguistics in Potsdam 6], Artemis Alexiadou & Peter Svenonius (eds), 103–132. Potsdam: University of Potsdam.
. 2004. The feature-based theory of adverb syntax. In Adverbials. The Interplay between Meaning, Context and Syntactic Structure [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 70], Jennifer R. Austin, Stefan Engelberg & Gisa Rauh (eds), 205–252. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2006. Le rôle de l’interface syntaxe-structure informationnelle dans la variation de l’ordre des constituants dans la phrase. Nouveaux Cahiers de Linguistique Française 27: 53–81. Université de Genève.
Laenzlinger, Christopher & Soare, Gabriela. 2005a. On merging positions for arguments and adverbs in the Romance Mittelfeld. In Contributions to the Thirtieth Incontro di Grammatica Generativa, Laura Brugè, Giuliana Giusti, Walter Schweikert & Nicola Munaro (eds), 105–128. Venice: Cafoscarina.
Laenzlinger, Christopher & Soare Gabriela. 2005b. Deriving Positions for Arguments and Adverbs in Romance. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 30: 17–69.
Mahajan, Anoop. 2003. Word order and (remnant) vP movement. In Word Order and Scrambling, Simin Karimi (ed.), 217–237. Oxford: Blackwell.
Miyagawa, Shigeru 2005. EPP and semantically vacuous scrambling. In The Free Word Order Phenomenon: Its Syntactic Sources and Diversity, Joachim Sabel & Mamoru Saito (eds), 181–220. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.
Pesetsky, David & Torrego, Esther. 2004. The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In Phrasal and Clausal Architecture [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 101], Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian & Wendy K. Wilkins (eds), 262–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pittner, Karin. 2004. Adverbial positions in the German middle field. In Adverbials. The Interplay between Meaning, Context and Syntactic Structure [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 70], Jennifer R. Austin, Stefan Engelberg & Gisa Rauh (eds), 253–287. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Platzack, Chris. 2001. Multiple interfaces. In Cognitive Interfaces, Urpo Nikanne & Emile van der Zee (eds.). 21–53. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Poletto, Cecilia. 2000. The Higher Functional Field: Evidence from Northern Italian Dialects. Oxford: OUP.
. 1997. The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery. In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
. 2004b. Locality and the left periphery. In Structures and Beyond. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Adriana Belletti (ed.), Vol. 3, 104–131, Oxford: OUP.
. 2006. On the form of chains: Criterial positions and ECP effects. In Wh-movement: Moving on, Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng & Nobert Corver (eds), 97–134. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Rizzi, Luigi & Shlonsky, Ur. 2006. Satisfying the subject criterion by a non-subject: English locative inversion and heavy NP shift. Ms, University of Siena and University of Geneva.
. 2007. Strategies of subject extraction. In Interfaces + Recursion = Language? Chomsky's Minimalism and the View from Syntax-Semantics, Hans-Martin Gärtner & Uli Sauerland (eds), 115–160. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Sabel, Joachim & Saito, Mamoru. 2005. The Free Word Order Phenomenon: Its Syntactic Sources and Diversity. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
Saito, Mamoru. 1989. Scrambling as semantically vacuous A’-movement. In Alternative Conceptions of Phrase Structure, Mark R. Baltin & Anthony S. Kroch (eds), 192–200. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Schweikert, W. 2005. The Order of Prepositional Phrases in the Structure of the Clause [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics 83] Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Shlonsky, Ur. 2010. The cartographic enterprise in syntax. Language and Linguistics Compass 4(6), 417–429.
Tescari Neto, Aquiles. 2013. On Verb Movement in Brazilian Portuguese: A Cartography study. PhD dissertation, Ca’Foscari University, Venice.
Uriagereka, Juan. 1995. Aspects of the syntax of clitic placement in Western Romance. Linguistic Inquiry 26, 79–123.
. 1999. Multiple Spell Out. In Working Minimalism, Samuel D. Epstein & Norbert Hornstein (eds), 251–282. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
van Gelderen, Véronique. 2003. Scrambling Unscrambled, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Leiden.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Keizer, Evelien, Thomas Schwaiger & Elnora ten Wolde
Keizer, Evelien
2018. Interpersonal adverbs in FDG. In Recent developments in Functional Discourse Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series, 205], ► pp. 47 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
