In:Adverbs: Functional and diachronic aspects
Edited by Karin Pittner, Daniela Elsner and Fabian Barteld
[Studies in Language Companion Series 170] 2015
► pp. 83–100
Dutch adverbial morphology
A scalar approach
Published online: 24 September 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.170.04die
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.170.04die
Based on a particular aspect of the Ph.D. dissertation by Diepeveen (2012), this paper deals with the notion of adverbial morphology by presenting the case of Dutch. Existing accounts of the inventory of Dutch adverbial suffixes are rather diverse. I claim that the category of adverbial morphology is less clear-cut than traditionally assumed. Instead, I argue that the suffixes in question belong to a broader category that is arranged in a prototype manner: the suffixes at one end of the cline tend to form prototypical adjectives whereas the suffixes at the other end tend to form prototypical adverbs – with a transitional zone in between. This account leads to the conclusion that the inventory of Dutch ‘adverbial suffixes’ proper is much smaller than previously assumed.
References (19)
de Haas, Wim & Trommelen, Mieke. 1993. Morfologisch Handboek van het Nederlands. Een Overzicht van de Woordvorming. De Haag: SDU Uitgeverij.
Diepeveen, Ariane. 2012. Modifying words. Dutch Adverbial Morphology in Contrast. PhD dissertation, Freie Universität Berlin. (FU Dissertationen Online) <[URL]
Diepeveen, Janneke. 2011.
Interestingly, interessanterweise, interessant genoeg: De vorming van evaluatieve bepalingen in het Nederlands vanuit contrastief perspectief. Lage Landen Studies 2: 195–220.
. 2013. Linguistically interesting: Dutch domain adverbials in contrast. JournaLIPP 2: 15–29. <[URL]>
Diepeveen, Janneke & Van de Velde, Freek. 2010. Adverbial morphology: How Dutch and German are moving away from English. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 22(4): 389–413.
Dressler, Wolfgang U. 1989. Protoypical differences between inflection and derivation. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 42(1): 3–10.
Haeseryn, Walter, Romijn, Kirsten, Geerts, Guido, de Rooij, Jaap J. & van den Toorn, Maarten C. 1997. Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst, 2nd edn. Groningen & Deurne: Martinus Nijhoff & Wolters Plantyn.
Heinle, Eva-Maria. 2004. Diachronische Wortbildung unter syntaktischem Aspekt. Das Adverb. Heidelberg: Winter.
Pounder, Amanda. 2001. Adverb‐marking in German and English. System and standardization. Diachronica 18(2): 301–358.
Ramat, Paolo & Ricca, Davide. 1998. Sentence adverbs in the languages of Europe. In Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe, Johan van der Auwera (ed.), 189–275. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Van de Velde, Freek. 2005. Exaptatie en subjectificatie in de Nederlandse adverbiale morfologie. Handelingen der Koninklijke Zuid-Nederlandse Maatschappij voor Taal- en Letterkunde en Geschiedenis 58: 105–124.
van der Auwera, Johan & Gast, Volker. 2011. Categories and prototypes. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, Jae Jung Sung (ed.), 165–189. Oxford: OUP.
van der Horst, Joop. 2008. Geschiedenis van de Nederlandse Syntaxis. Leuven: Universitaire Pers Leuven.
van der Horst, Joop M. & van der Horst, Kees. 1999. Geschiedenis van het Nederlands in de Twintigste Eeuw. Den Haag: SDU Uitgeverij.
van der Sijs, Nicoline. 2002. Chronologisch Woordenboek. De Ouderdom en Herkomst van Onze Woorden en Betekenissen. Amsterdam: L.J. Veen.
Weerman, Fred P. 2005. Adverbia als adjectiva. In Taalkundige Artikelen voor Ad Welschen, Els Elffers & Fred P. Weerman (eds). Amsterdam: Faculteit der Geesteswetenschappen UvA. <[URL]>
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
