Cover not available

In:Perspectives on Historical Syntax
Edited by Carlotta Viti
[Studies in Language Companion Series 169] 2015
► pp. 271–290

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

What role for inscriptions in the study of syntax and syntactic change in the old Indo-European languages?

The pros and cons of an integration of epigraphic corpora

 | University of Zurich and University of Grenoble)*
Published online: 29 April 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.169.11del
It happens that scholars dealing with syntactic problems (especially of a theoretical nature) tend to dismiss inscriptional records of ancient I.-E. languages as being “not useful” or “too difficult to investigate”. In this paper, I will try firstly to understand where this attitude towards inscriptions originates from. Secondly, I will present some case-studies useful to shed light on the specific characteristics of inscriptions, which are not only texts but also concrete objects, and I will explore the pros and cons of the integration of epigraphic texts in the study of syntactic problems in the case of ancient languages. Finally, I will provide some reflections on the fact that scholars who would like to use inscriptions in their studies still do not have suitable digital tools at their disposal.**
References (54)
Editions
CEG: Carmina Epigraphica Graeca. 1983-1989. P.A. Hansen. Vol. I (1983). Vol. II (1989). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chandler, Richard. 1774. Inscriptiones antiquae pleraeque nondum editae in Asia Minori et Graecia. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
CIL: Corpus inscriptionum Latinarum. Berlin: Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften.
CLE: Carmina Latina Epigraphica. Franz Buecheler. 1895-1897. Vol. I (1895). Vol. II (1897). Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
IG: Inscriptiones Graecae. Berlin: Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften.
IGASMG I: Renato Arena. 19962. Iscrizioni greche arcaiche di Sicilia e Magna Grecia. I. Iscrizioni di Megara Iblea e Selinunte. Pisa: Nistri Lischi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
IGLSyr I: Inscriptions grecques et latines de la Syrie, I. Commagène et Cyrrhestique. Louis Jalabert - René Mouterde. 1929. Paris: Geuthner.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
ILS: Inscriptiones Latinae selectae. Hermann Dessau. 1892-1916. Berlin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
CalderIII, William M. 1963. The Inscription from Temple G at Selinous [Greek, Roman and Byzantine Monographs 4]. London and Beccles: Duke University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macalister, R.A.S. 1945-1949. Corpus inscriptionum insularum Celticarum. 2 vols. Vol. I (1945). Vol. II (1949). Dublin: Stationery Office.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Res gestae divi Augusti. Text, translation, and commentary. 2009. Alison E. Cooley. Cambridge: Cambridge University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
SEG: Supplementum epigraphicum Graecum. Leiden: Brill.
Electronic Databases
Epigraphik-Datenbank Clauss / Slaby. Manfred Clauss. <[URL]>
Searchable Greek Inscriptions. A Scholarly Tool in Progress. Los Altos: The Packard Humanities Centre. <[URL]>
CIL: Corpus inscriptionum Latinarum. Berlin: Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften. <[URL]>
The Ancient Greek and Latin Dependency Treebank. Perseus. <[URL]>
Secondary Literature
Adams, James N. 2003. Bilingualism and the Latin Language. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Social Variation and the Latin Language. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alföldy, Géza. 1989. Epigraphische Notizen aus Italien III. Inschriften aus Nursia (Norcia). Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 77: 155-180.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Babeu, Alison. 2011. ‘Rome Wasn’t Digitized in a Day’: Building a Cyberinfrastructure for Digital Classics. Washington DC: Council on Library and Information Resources.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bile, Monique. 1988. Le dialecte crétois ancien, Étude de la langue des inscriptions, recueil des inscriptions postérieures aux IC, Paris: Geuthner.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buck, Carl Darling. 1955 The Greek Dialects. London: Bristol Classical (reprint 2001).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clackson, James & Horrocks, Geoffrey. 2007. The Blackwell History of the Latin Language. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Denizot, Camille. 2011. Donner des ordres en grec ancien. Étude linguistique des forms de l’injonction[Cahiers de l’ERIAC 3, Fonctionnements linguistiques]. Mont-Saint-Aignan: Publication des universities de Rouen et du Havre.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Disterheft, Dorothy & Viti, Carlotta. 2013[2010]. Subordination. In Bloomsbury Companion to Historical Linguistics [Bloomsbury Companions], Silvia Luraghi & Vit Bubenik (eds), 230-249. London: BloomsburyGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eythórsson, Thórhallur. 2013. Syntactic change. In Bloomsbury Companion to Syntax, Silvia Luraghi & Claudia Parodi (eds), 365-388. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fry, Carole. 2012. (Review of) Ari Saastamoinen: The phraseology of Latin building inscriptions in Roman North Africa. Commentationes humanarum litterarum 127. Finnish Society of Sciences and Letters, Helsinki 2010, 646 p. Museum Helveticum 69: 231-232.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
García Ramón, José Luis. 2001. Impératif et infinitif pro impératif dans les textes grecs dialectaux: les Lois de Gortyne. Verbum 23(3): 341-360.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hodot, René. 1990. Le dialecte éolien d’Asie, la langue des inscriptions, VIIe s. a. C.-IVe s. p.C. Paris: Recherches sur les civilisations.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horrocks, Geoffrey. 2010. Syntax: From Classical Greek to the Koine. In A History of Ancient Greek: From the Beginnings to Late Antiquity, Anastasios-Phoivos Christidis, Maria Arapopoulou & Maria Chriti (eds), 618-631. Cambridge: CUP. Originally published in Greek, 2001.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 20102. Greek: A History of the Language and its speakers. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Latin syntax. In A Companion to the Latin Language, James Clackson (ed.). Chichester : Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karvounis, Christos. 20082 [2008]. Aussprache und Phonologie im Altgriechischen. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kruschwitz, Peter. 2000. Die sprachlichen Anomalien der Werbeinschrift CIL X 7296. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 130: 239-240.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Römische Inschriften und Wackernagels Gesetz. Untersuchungen zur Syntax epigraphischer Texte aus republikanischer Zeit [Schriften der Philosophisch‑historischen Klasse der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften, Band 31]. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meiser, Gerhard. 20103. Historische Laut und Formenlehre der lateinischen Sprache. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Minon, Sophie. 2007. Les inscriptions éléennes dialectales (VIe-IIe s. av. J. C.), I Textes, II Grammaire et vocabulaire institutionnel. Genève: Droz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. La stèle diglosse de Sigée en Troade (IG I3 1508, ca 550 a. C.). In Traduire, transposer, transmettre dans l'Antiquité gréco‑romaine [Textes, Images et Monuments de l’Antiquité au haut Moyen âge 9], Bernard Bortolussi, Madeleine Keller, Sophie Minon & Lyliane Sznajder (eds), 91-105. Paris: Picard.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ringe, Don & Eska, Joseph F. 2013. Historical Linguistics. Towards a Twenty-First Century Reintegration. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, Ernest Stewart & Gardner, Ernest Arthur 1887-1905. An Introduction to Greek Epigraphy, Part I: The Archaic Inscriptions and the Greek Alphabet (1887). Part II: The Inscriptions of Attica 1905). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saastamoinen, Ari. 2010. The Phraseology of Latin Building Inscriptions in Roman North Africa [Commentationes humanarum litterarum 127]. Helsinki: Finnish Society of Sciences and Letters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schick, Carla. 1955A. Appunti per una storia della prosa greca, I: La lingua delle iscrizioni. Rivista di Filologia e di Istruzione Classica N. S. 33(1): 361-390.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1955B. Una questione di sintassi storica. L’infinito imperativale e i varî modi di esprimere il commando in greco arcaico. Atti della Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei. Rediconti. Anno 352. Classe di Scienze Morali, Storiche e Filologiche 10: 410-421.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwyzer, Eduard, et al. 1939-1971. Griechische Grammatik, 4 vols. München: Beck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Threatte, Leslie. 1980-1996. A Grammar of Attic Inscriptions. Phonology. Vol. I (1980), Morphology. Vol. II (1996). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Treherne, George G.T. 1920. Eglwys Cymmin Epitaphs. Cartmarthen: Spurrell & Son.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tribulato, Olga. 2011. The stone-cutter’s bilingual inscription from Palermo (IG XIV 297 = CIL X 7296): A new interpretation. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 177: 131-140.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Siculi bilingues? Latin in the inscriptions of Early Roman Sicily. In Language and Linguistic Contact in Ancient Sicily [Cambridge Classical Studies], Olga Tribulato (ed.), 291-325. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Emde Boas, Evert & Huitink, Luuk. 2010. Syntax. In A Companion to the Ancient Greek Language, Egbert J. Bakker (ed.), 134-150. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vatri, Alessandro. 2013. Dead language processing: Can we build a corpus of natural classical Greek. Paper given at the HiCor workshop, Faculty of History, University of Oxford, 1 March.
Wachter, Rudolf. 2010. Inscriptions. In A Companion to the Ancient Greek Language, Egbert J. Bakker (ed.), 47-61. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Waldis, Joseph. 1920. Sprache und Stil der großen griechischen Inschrift vom Nemrud-Dagh in Kommagene (Nordsyrien). Ein Beitrag zur Koine-Forschung. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Willets, Ronald F. 1967. The law code of Gortyn. Berlin: Göschen’sche Verlagshandlung. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ziegler, Sabine. 1994. Die Sprache der Altirischen Ogam-Inschriften [Historische Sprachforschung, Ergänzungsheft 36]. Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue