In:Perspectives on Historical Syntax
Edited by Carlotta Viti
[Studies in Language Companion Series 169] 2015
► pp. 251–270
Problematizing syndetic coordination
Ancient Greek ‘and’ from Homer to Aristophanes
Published online: 29 April 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.169.10bon
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.169.10bon
The article problematizes the interpretation of three ancient Greek particles, te, kaí and dé, which represent the most common ‘and’ coordination devices in Archaic and Classical Greek. They show a considerable degree of variation in occurrence, combination, function and meaning across time and in different genres. Such a variation calls for the consideration of discourse phenomena that transcend syntactic distinctions.
References (49)
Allan, Rutger J. 2007. Sense and sentence complexity. Sentence structure, sentence connection, and tense-aspect as indicators of narrative mode in Thucydides' Histories
. In The Language of Literature. Linguistic Approaches to Classical Texts, Rutger J. Allan, Michael Buijs, Irene. J.F. de Jong & Albert Rijksbaron (eds), 93-121. Leiden: Brill.
Bakker, Egbert J. 1997. Poetry in Speech: Orality and Homeric Discourse. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.
Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar. 2012. Of Ens ’n’ Ands: Observations on the phonetic make-up of a coordinator and its uses in talk-in-interaction. Language and Speech 55: 35-56.
Bonifazi, Anna, Drummen Annemieke, De Kreij, Mark. Forthcoming. Particles in Ancient Greek Discourse. Pragmatic studies of particle use across genres. Washington DC & Cambridge, MA: Center for Hellenic Studies & Harvard University Press.
Cooper III, Guy L. 1998. Attic Greek Prose Syntax, Vol. 2. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.
Van Erp Taalman Kip, A. Maria. 2009.
Kai mên, kai dê and êdê in tragedy and comedy. In Discourse Cohesion in Ancient Greek, Gerry C. Wakker & Stephanie J. Bakker (eds), 111-133. Leiden: Brill.
Gonda, Jan. 1954. The history and original function of the Indo-European particle *kwe, especially in Greek and Latin. Mnemosyne 4: 177-214 and 265-296.
Grégoire, Antoine. 1930. Notes sur la place occupée par les particules γε and δέ dans la versification homérique. Serta Leodiensia 44: 154-176.
Grice, H. Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts, Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds), 41-58. New York NY: Academic Press.
Hajnal, Ivo. 2004.
e-ke-qe oder e-ke? – Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit in den mykenischen Palastarchiven. In Analecta Homini Universalis Dicata. Arbeiten zur Indogermanistik, Linguistik, Philologie, Politik, Musik und Dichtung. Festschrift für Oswald Panagl zum 65. Geburtstag, Thomas Krisch, Thomas Lindner & Ulrich Müller (eds), 233-251. Stuttgart: Hans-Dieter Heinz.
Henderson, Jeffrey (ed.). 2000. Aristophanes: Birds, Lysistrata, Women at the Thesmophoria. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Hilgard, Alfred. 1901. Scholia in Dionysii Thracis artem grammaticam. Grammatici Graceci 1.3. Leipzig: Teubner.
Hoffner, Harry A. & Melchert, Craig H. 2008. A Grammar of the Hittite language. Winona Lake IN: Eisenbrauns.
Klein, Jared. S. 1992. Some Indo-European systems of conjunction: Rigveda, Old Persian, Homer. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 94: 1-51.
Lakoff, Robin T. 1971. If’s, and’s, and but’s about conjunctions. In Studies in Linguistic Semantics, Charles. J. Fillmore & D. Terence Langendoen (eds), 114-49. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Mithun, Marianne. 1988. The grammaticization of coordination. In Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 18], John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 331-359. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Orlandini, Anna & Poccetti, Paolo. 2007. L’expression de la coordination connective et copulative en latin et dans les langues de l’Italie ancienne, In Actes du XIII Colloque International de Linguistique Latin, Gérald Prunelle (ed.), 129-142. Liège: Université de Liège.
Race, William H. (ed.). 1997. Pindar: Nemean Odes, Isthmian Odes, Fragments. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Rijksbaron, Albert. 1997. Adverb or connector? The case of kai ... de
. In New Approaches to Greek Particles, Albert Rijksbaron (ed.), 187-208. Amsterdam: J. C. Gieben.
Segal, Erwin M., Duchan, Judith F. & Scott, Paula J. 1991. The role of interclausal connectives in narrative structuring: Evidence from adults' interpretations of simple stories. Discourse Processes 14: 27-54.
Schmerling, Susan F. 1975. Asymmetric conjunction and rules of conversation. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts, Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds), 211-231. New York NY: Academic Press.
Swiggers, Pierre & Wouters, Alfons. 2002. Grammatical Theory and Philosophy of Language in Antiquity. Leuven: Peeters.
Titrud, Kermit. 1991. The overlooked καί [kai] in the Greek New Testament. Notes on Translation 5: 1-28.
Traugott, Elizabeth. 1986. On the origins of “and” and “but” connectives in English. Studies in Language 10: 137-150.
Vigerus, Franciscus. 1834[originally published in 1627]. De praecipuis graecae dictionis idiotismis liber cum animdsversionibus H. Hoogevenii, et I.c. Zeunii. Ed. et annotationes addidit G. Hermannus, 4th edn. Leipzig: Sumtibus Librariae Hahnianae.
Viti, Carlotta. 2006. AND in the Early Indo-European languages. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 91: 129-165.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Maurais, Jean
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
