Cover not available

In:Perspectives on Historical Syntax
Edited by Carlotta Viti
[Studies in Language Companion Series 169] 2015
► pp. 233–250

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Studying word order changes in Latin

Some methodological remarks

ORCiD logo with link | Ghent University
Published online: 29 April 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.169.09dan
The main aim of this contribution is to argue that a linear string of Latin words can correspond to more than one syntactic structure, and that this potential for structural ambiguity has important methodological consequences for the synchronic and diachronic study of Latin word order. On the basis of a detailed case study on the much-discussed OV/VO alternation in the history of Latin, it will be shown that whether or not one controls for structural ambiguity is not a theory-internal choice, but that it has major empirical consequences. The conclusion is that quantitative results that emerge from a study that only takes into account syntactically non-ambiguous environments provide a more accurate characterization of the syntactic changes that took place during the evolution from Latin towards the (early) Romance languages.
References (29)
References
Adams, James. 1976a. A typological approach to Latin word order. Indogermanische Forschungen 81: 70-100.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1976b. The Text and Language of a Vulgar Latin Chronicle (Anonymus Valesianus II). London: Institute of Classical Studies.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1977. The Vulgar Latin of the Letters of Claudius Terentianus. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Álvarez Pedrosa Nuñez, Juan Antonio. 1989. Estudio comparado del orden de palabras en inscripciones jurídicas arcaicas, griegas y latinas. Revista Española de Lingüística 18: 109-128.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Amacker, René. 1989. Sur l'ordre des termes dans la proposition latine. In Subordination and other Topics in Latin [Studies in Language Companion Series 17], Gualtiero Calboli (ed.), 485-502. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bauer, Brigitte. 1995. The Emergence and Development of SVO Patterning in Latin and French. Diachronic and Psycholinguistic Perspectives. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolkestein, A. Machtelt. 1989. Parameters in the expression of embedded predications in Latin. In Subordination and Other Topics in Latin [Studies in Language Companion Series 17], Gualtiero Calboli (ed.), 3-35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brunet, Etienne & Sylvie Mellet. n.d. Hyperbase 5.5. Logiciel hypertexte pour le traitement documentaire et statistique des corpus textuels. Base de littérature latine. Bases, Corpus & Langage (Université de Nice – Sophia Antipolis) & LASLA (Université de Liège).
Cabrillana, Concepción. 1993. Posiciones relativas en la ordenación de constituyentes I: estudio de la posición de sujeto, objeto y verbo. Habis 24: 249-266.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. Type of text, pragmatic function and constituent order. A comparative study between the Mulomedicina Chironis and the Peregrinatio Egeriae . In Latin vulgaire - latin tardif V, Hubert Petersmann & Rudolf Kettemann (eds), 319-330. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads. A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Restructuring and Functional Heads [The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 4]. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Danckaert, Lieven. 2012. Latin Embedded Clauses. The Left Periphery [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 184]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Devine, Andrew & Stephens, Laurence. 2006. Latin Word Order. Structured Meaning and Information. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Embick, David. 2000. Features, syntax and categories in the Latin perfect. Linguistic Inquiry 31: 185-230. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flobert, Pierre. 1975. Les verbes déponents latins des origines à Charlemagne. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Franks, Steven & Lavine, James. 2006. Case and word order in Lithuanian. Journal of Linguistics 42: 239-288. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koll, Hans-Georg. 1965. Zur Stellung des Verbs im spätantiken und frühmittelalterlichen Latein. Mittellateinisches Jahrbuch 2: 241-272.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam. 2012. From Latin to Romance. Morphosyntactic Typology and Change. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marouzeau, Jules. 1922-49. L'ordre des mots dans la phrase latine, 3 Vols. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moreno Hernández, Antonio. 1989. Tipología lingüística y orden de la palabras en el latín de Terencio. In Actas del VII congreso español de estudios clásicos, Vol. 1, 523-528. Madrid: Universidad Complutense.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Panchón Cabañeros, Federico. 1986. Orden de palabras en latín (César, B. G. I; Cicerón Pro Milone). Studia Zamorensia 7: 213-229.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinkster, Harm. 1990. Latin Syntax and Semantics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1991. Evidence for SVO in Latin? In Latin and the Romance Languages in the Early Middle Ages, Roger Wright (ed.), 69-82. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Polo, Chiara. 2004. Word Order between Morphology and Syntax. Padova: Unipress.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ramat, Paolo. 1984. Per una tipologia del latino pompeiano. In Linguistica tipologica, Paolo Ramat (ed.), 137-142. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talavera Esteso, Francisco. 1981. Aspectos vulgares de la Vetus Latina: análisis especial del orden de palabras en el libro de Rut. Analecta Malacitana 4: 211-227.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zennaro, Luigi. 2006. La sintassi dei verbi a ristrutturazione in Latino. PhD dissertation, Università di Venezia 'Ca' Foscari'.
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Haider, Hubert & Luka Szucsich
2022. Slavic languages are Type 3 languages: replies. Theoretical Linguistics 48:1-2 ► pp. 113 ff. DOI logo
STRUIK, TARA & ANS VAN KEMENADE
2020. On the givenness of OV word order: a (re)examination of OV/VO variation in Old English. English Language and Linguistics 24:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Ponti, Edoardo Maria & Silvia Luraghi
2018. Non-configurationality in diachrony. Diachronica 35:3 ► pp. 367 ff. DOI logo
Ponti, Edoardo Maria & Silvia Luraghi
2020. Non-configurationality in diachrony. In Diachronic Treebanks for Historical Linguistics [Benjamins Current Topics, 113], ► pp. 69 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue