Cover not available

In:Perspectives on Historical Syntax
Edited by Carlotta Viti
[Studies in Language Companion Series 169] 2015
► pp. 187–202

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Treebanks in historical linguistic research

 | University of Oslo
Published online: 29 April 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.169.07hau
In this methodological article I discuss the advantages of using parsed corpora (treebanks) for historical linguistics research. I argue that even apparently simple, descriptive questions such as how often different word orders occur cannot be adequately answered without the use of treebanks, which make the underlying theoretical assumptions explicit. I demonstrate this concretely with a case study from word order in participle clauses in the New Testament.
References (25)
References
Aland, Kurt, Matthew Black, Bruce Metzger and Allen Wikgren, Greek New Testament, 3rd edition. Stuttgart: United Bible Societies.
Behaghel, Otto. 1932. Deutsche Syntax IV. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan. 2001. Lexical-Functional Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Citko, Barbara. 2011. Multidominance. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism, Cedric Boeckx (ed.), 119–142, Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dalrymple, Mary. 2001. Lexical Functional Grammar. San Diego CA: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davison, M.E. 1989. New Testament Greek word order. Literary and Linguistic Computing 4: 19–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dik, Helma. 1995. Word Order in Ancient Greek. A Pragmatic Account of Word Order in Herodotus. Amsterdam: J. C. Gieben.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friberg, Barbara & Friberg, Timothy. 1981. Analytical Greek New Testament. Grand Rapids MI: Baker Book House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hale, Ken. 1983. Warlpiri and the grammar of non-configurational languages. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 1(1): 5–47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Happ, Heinz. 1976. Grundfragen einer Dependenzgrammatik des Lateinischen. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haug, Dag, Eckhoff, Hanne & Welo, Eirik. 2014. The theoretical foundations of givenness annotation. In Information Structure and Syntactic Change in Germanic and Romance Languages [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 213], Kristin Bech & Kristine Eide (eds), 17-52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haug, Dag & Jøhndal, Marius L. 2008. Creating a parallel treebank of the old Indo-European bible translations. In Language Resources and Evaluation, Marrakech, Morocco.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haug, Dag, Jøhndal, Marius L., Eckhoff, Hanne, Welo, Eirik, Hertzenberg, Mari & Müth, Angelika. 2009. Computational and linguistic issues in designing a syntactically annotated parallel corpus of Indo-European languages. Traitement Automatique des Langues 50: 17–45.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaplan, Ronald M. & Bresnan, Joan. 1982. Lexical-Functional Grammar: A formal system for grammatical representation. In The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, Joan Bresnan (ed.), 173–281, Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kienpointner, Manfred. 2010. Latein-Deutsch kontrastiv. Tübingen: Julius Groos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kirk, Allison. 2012. Word Order and Information Structure in New Testament Greek. PhD dissertation, Universiteit Leiden.
Kiss, É. Katalin. 1995. Discourse Configurational Languages. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matić, Dejan. 2003. Topic, focus, and discourse structure. Studies in Language 27: 573–633. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Niyogi, Partha. 2002. The computational study of diachronic linguistics. In Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change, David Lightfoot (ed.), 351– 365. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pereira, Fernando. 2000. Formal grammar and information theory: Together again? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 358: 1239–1253. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Polinksy, Maria & Potsdam, Eric. 2002a. Backward control. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 245–282. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rife, J. Merle. 1933. The mechanics of translation Greek. Journal of Biblical Literature 52: 244–252. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
von Tischendorf, Constantin. 1869–1872. Novum Testamentum Graece, 8th edn. Leipzig: Hinrichs.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Sokolov, E. G.
2024. Both teacher and guide, or On the meaning of the word nastavnik (tutor) in the 18th century. Russian language at school 85:1 ► pp. 106 ff. DOI logo
Cathcart, Chundra, Gerd Carling, Filip Larsson, Niklas Johansson & Erich Round
2022. Areal pressure in grammatical evolution. Diachronica ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Eckhoff, Hanne Martine, Silvia Luraghi & Marco Passarotti
2018. The added value of diachronic treebanks for historical linguistics. Diachronica 35:3 ► pp. 297 ff. DOI logo
Eckhoff, Hanne Martine, Silvia Luraghi & Marco Passarotti
2020. The added value of diachronic treebanks for historical linguistics. In Diachronic Treebanks for Historical Linguistics [Benjamins Current Topics, 113], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue