In:Causation, Permission, and Transfer: Argument realisation in GET, TAKE, PUT, GIVE and LET verbs
Edited by Brian Nolan, Gudrun Rawoens and Elke Diedrichsen
[Studies in Language Companion Series 167] 2015
► pp. 295–325
Low-level patterning of pronominal subjects and verb tenses in English
Published online: 14 January 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.167.11new
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.167.11new
This paper explores patterns of co-occurrence of selected subject pronouns (I, you, she, he) with past, present, and future tense uses of English verbs, with a focus on give, send, and bring. Statistically significant overuse and underuse of the subject pronouns are determined by reference to overall frequencies of subject pronouns and verb tenses in two corpora of spoken language. A key result is that I is overused with give, send, and bring in the future tense but underused in the present and past tenses. Co-occurrence preferences such as these are not easily intuited and demonstrate the value of corpus-based methodologies in refining our notions of the semantics of argument structure.
References (37)
Agresti, Alan. 2007. An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis, 2nd edn. Hoboken NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
Bernard, Lou (ed.). 2007. Reference Guide for the British National Corpus (XML Edition). Published by Research Technologies Service at Oxford University Computing Services. <[URL]> (12 October 2013)
Biber, Douglas, Conrad, Susan & Reppen, Randi. 1998. Corpus Linguistics. Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: CUP.
Comrie, Bernard. 2000.
Give and person suppletion. LINGUIST List 11.1166. <[URL]> (12 October 2013).
. 2003. Recipient person suppletion in the verb ‘give’. In Language and Life. Essays in Memory of Kenneth L Pike, Mary Ruth Wise, Thomas N. Headland & Ruth Brend (eds), 265–281. Dallas TX: SIL International and The University of Texas at Arlington.
Davies, Mark. 2004–. BYU-BNC (Based on the British National Corpus from Oxford University Press). <[URL]> (15 April 2014).
. 2008–. The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990–present. <[URL]> (15 April 2014).
Dixon, Robert M.W. 1991. A New Approach to English Grammar, on Semantic Principles. New York and Oxford: OUP.
Gahl, Susanne & Garnsey, Susan M. 2004. Knowledge of grammar, knowledge of usage. Syntactic probabilities affect pronunciation variation. Language 80(4): 748–775.
. 2006. Knowledge of grammar includes knowledge of syntactic probabilities. Language 82(2): 405–410.
Gahl, Susanne, Jurafsky, Dan & Roland, Douglas. 2004. Verb subcategorization frequencies: American English corpus data, methodological studies, and cross-corpus comparisons. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 36: 432–443.
Gries, Stefan Thomas. 2006. Exploring variability within and between corpora. Some methodological considerations. Corpora 1(2): 109–151.
. 2013b. Basic significance testing. In Research Methods in Linguistics, Robert J. Podesva & Devyani Sharma (eds), 316–336. Cambridge: CUP.
Hale, Kenneth L. 1972. A new perspective on American Indian linguistics. In New Perspectives on the Pueblos, Alfonso Ortiz (ed.), 87–103. Albuquerque NM: University of New Mexico Press.
Kilgarriff, Adam, Rychly, Pavel, Smrz, Pavel & Tugwell, David. 2004. The Sketch Engine. Proceedings of EURALEX 2004, Lorient, France, 105–116. <[URL]> (12 October 2013).
Knowles, Gerry & Don, Zuraidah Mohd. 2004. The notion of a “lemma”. Headwords, roots and lexical sets. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9: 69–81.
Manning, Christopher D. 2003. Probabilistic syntax. In Probabilistic Linguistics, Rens Bod,
Jennifer Hay & Stefanie Jannedy (eds), 289–341. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Newman, John. 1996. Give. A Cognitive Linguistic Study [Cognitive Linguistics Research 7]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Newman, John & Rice, Sally. 2006. Transitivity schemas of English eat and drink in the BNC. In Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics. Corpus-based Approaches to Syntax and Lexis, Stefan Thomas Gries & Anatol Stefanowitsch (eds), 225–260. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
R Development Core Team. 2014. R. A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria.
Reesink, Ger. 2013. Expressing the GIVE event in Papuan languages. A preliminary survey. Linguistic Typology 17(2): 217–266.
Scheibman, Joanne. 2001. Local patterns of subjectivity in person and verb type in American English conversation. In Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure [Typological Studies in Language 45], Joan Bybee & Paul Hopper (eds), 61–89. Amsterdam: John
Benjamins.
. 2002. Point of View and Grammar. Structural Patterns of Subjectivity in American English Conversation [Studies in Discourse and Grammar 11]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Grammatical Categories in Australian Languages, Robert M.W. Dixon (ed.), 112–171. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Gries, Stefan Thomas. 2003. Collostructions. Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8(2): 209–243.
Tao, Hongyin. 2001. Discovering the usual with corpora: The case of remember. In Corpus Linguistics in North America: Selections from the 1999 Symposium, Rita C. Simpson & John Swales (eds), 116–114. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.
Thompson, Sandra A. and Mulac, Anthony. 1991. A quantitative perspective on the grammaticization of epistemic parentheticals in English. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. II: Focus on Types of Grammatical Markers [Typological Studies in Language 19],
Elisabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 313–329. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Tomasello, Michael. 1998. One child’s early talk about possession. In The Linguistics of Giving [Typological Studies in Language 36], John Newman (ed.), 349–373. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
van Lier, Eva. 2012. Referential effects on the expression of three-participant events across languages. An introduction in memory of Anna Siewierska. Linguistic Discovery 10(3). <[URL]> (12 October 2013).