Cover not available

In:Causation, Permission, and Transfer: Argument realisation in GET, TAKE, PUT, GIVE and LET verbs
Edited by Brian Nolan, Gudrun Rawoens and Elke Diedrichsen
[Studies in Language Companion Series 167] 2015
► pp. 177–193

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Ditransitive constructions in Gan Chinese

A case study of the Yichun dialect

 | Zhejiang University, P.R. China
Published online: 14 January 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.167.06li
This paper studies ditransitive constructions in Gan Chinese, one of the seven main Chinese language families. Gan dialects have the ‘inverted’ double object construction, as schematized in the order of “verb-DO-IO” (DO stands for direct object and IO for indirect object), as contrasted with the ‘canonical’ double object construction in Mandarin, such as “verb-IO-DO”. According to Zhang (2010), there is no GIVE verb in Gan dialects and they use verbs like take, hold, and obtain in ditransitive constructions instead. On the basis of Zhang, we claim that ditransitives in Gan are often realized by the serial verb construction of V-DO-Directional-IO and that its inverted double object construction is derived from this sequence by deleting a directional element. We diverge from Zhang in claiming that these TAKE-HOLD verbs have developed into three-place predicates, which can be considered as genuine general-purpose GIVE verbs in Gan.
References (22)
References
Baker, Mark C. 1988. Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago IL: the University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa, Huang, James, Li, Audrey & Tang, Jane. 1999. Hoo Hoo Hoo in Taiwanese. In Contemporary Studies on the Min Dialects[Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series 14], Pang-Hsin Ting (ed.), 146–203. Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chin, Andy. 2010. Two types of indirect object marker in Chinese: Their typological significance and development. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 38(1): 1–25.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feng, Shengli. 2003. Prosodically constrained postverbal PPs in Mandarin Chinese. Linguistics 46: 1085–1122.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hashimoto, Mantaro. 1976. Language diffusion on the Asian continent: Problems of typological diversity in Sino-Tibetan. Computational Analyses of Asian and African Languages 3: 49–65.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, Hui-Chi. 2011. Double object construction in Hainan Min. Language and Linguistics 12(3): 501–527.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Y.-H. Audrey. 1990. Order and Constituency in Mandarin Chinese. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lin, Su-E. 2008. Hanyu nanfang fangyan daozhi shuangbin jiegou chutan (A study on inverted double object construction in southern Chinese dialects). Yuyan Kexue 7(3): 308–319.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, Danqing. 2001. Hanyu geiyulei shuangjiwu jiegou de leixingxue kaocha (A typological investigation of GIVE ditranstives in Chinese). Zhongguo Yuwen 5: 387–398.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej L., Haspelmath, Martin & Comrie, Bernard. 2010. Ditransitive construction: A typological overview. In Studies in Ditransitive Constructions: A Comparative Handbook, Andrej L. Malchukov, Martin Haspelmath & Bernard Comrie (eds). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Margetts, Anna & Austin, Peter K. 2007. Three participant events in the languages of the world: Towards a crosslinguistic typology. Linguistics 45(3): 393–451. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paul, Waltraud & Whitman, John. 2010. Applicative structure and Mandarin ditransitives. In Argument Structure and Syntactic Relations. A Cross-linguistic Perspective [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 158], Maia Duguine, Susana Huidobro & Nerea Madariaga (eds), 261–282. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peyraube, Alain. 1981. The dative construction in Cantonese. Computational Analysis of Asian and African Languages 16: 29–65.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Qiao, Yannong. 1966. Guangzhouhua kouyuci de yanjiu (Study on in colloquial words Cantonese). Hong Kong: Overseas Chinese Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tang, C.-C. Jane. 1990. Chinese Phrase Structure and the extended X-bar Theory. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.
Takashima, Ken-ichi & Yue, Anne. 2000. Evidence of possible dialect mixture in oracle-bone inscriptions. In In Memory of Li Fang-Kuei: Essays on Linguistic Change and the Chinese Dialects, Pang Hsin Ting & Anne O. Yue (eds), 1–52. Seattle & Taipei: University of Washington & Institute Linguistics, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tang, Sze-Wing. 1998. On the ‘inverted’ double object construction. In Studies in Cantonese Linguistics, Stephen Matthews (ed.), 35–52. Hong Kong: The Linguistic Society of Hong Kong.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. A Parametric Theory of Chinese Dialectal Grammar. Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yichun Shizhi. 1990. Gazetteer of the Yichun County. Hainan: Nanhai Publishing Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yue-Hashimoto, Anne. 1993. Comparative Chinese Dialectal Grammar. Paris: Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, Min. 2010. Hanyu fangyan jiwuxing jiegou nanbei chayi de chengyin: leixingxue jianjiu yingfa de xinwenti (Revisiting the alignment typology of ditransitive constructions in Chinese dialects). Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics 4(2): 87–270.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Lu, Wen & Man-Shan Hui
2025. Passing is giving. Journal of Historical Linguistics DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Cantonese give and Double-Object Construction [Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse, 15], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue