In:Causation, Permission, and Transfer: Argument realisation in GET, TAKE, PUT, GIVE and LET verbs
Edited by Brian Nolan, Gudrun Rawoens and Elke Diedrichsen
[Studies in Language Companion Series 167] 2015
► pp. 107–127
Grammaticalization of ‘give’ in Slavic between drift and contact
Causative, modal, imperative, existential, optative and volative constructions
Published online: 14 January 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.167.03wal
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.167.03wal
This paper gives an overview of grammaticalized constructions involving ‘give’ in the Slavic languages. The most widespread functions concern causatives ranging from permissive (‘letting’) to factitive (‘making’ or ‘having’) and a modal maker constructed with a reflexive (‘let itself’ > ‘it is possible’). These constructions are most widely developed in the West Slavic (Polish, Czech, Slovak and Sorbian) and Western South Slavic (Slovenian and Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian) languages. In Russian and the other East Slavic Languages Ukrainian and Belarusian, the use of hortative and imperative markers is more conspicuous. Further developments include the use of an existential construction closely modeling German ‘es gibt’ and an isolated optative function in Sorbian, as well as a volative construction in Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian.
While some of these developments reflect well known grammaticalization paths, others more clearly reflect idiosyncratic areal patterns converging with German models. An attempt is made to evaluate possible factors and pathways in the development of these constructions, paying special attention to the factor of language contact.
References (33)
BNK: Bulgarian National Corpus. Institute for Bulgarian language, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences. <[URL]>
CNK: Czech National Corpus – SYN2009PUB. Institute of the Czech National Corpus FF UK, Praha 2010. <[URL]>
GigaFida: Gigafida Reference Corpus of Slovenian. Ministry of Education, Science and Sport, Republic of Slovenia. <[URL]>
NKJP
: Przepiórkowski, Adam, Banko, Miroslaw, Górski, Rafał & Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Barbara (eds). 2012. Narodowy Korpus Jezyka Polskiego. PWN, Warsaw. <[URL]>
ParaSol
: von Waldenfels, Ruprecht & Meyer, Roland. 2006-. ParaSol, a Parallel Corpus of Slavic and Other Languages. Bern. <[URL]>
RNC: Russian National Corpus. <[URL]>
References
Barentsen, Adrian. 2003. O pobuditel’nyx konstrukcijax s ispolnitelem 1-go lica, 1–33. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Buzássyová, Klára & Jarošová, Alexandra (eds). 2006. Slovník súcasného slovenského jazyka, A-G. Bratislava: Veda.
Derksen, Rick. 2008. Etymological Dictionary of the Slavic Inherited Lexicon [Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series 4]. Leiden: Brill.
Heine, Bernd, Claudi, Ulrike & Hünnemeyer, Friederike. 1991. Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Janjuševic, Ana. 2009. Inkluzivni imperativ u srpskom jeziku. Srpski Jezik – Studije Srpske i Slovenske 14(1–2): 361–374.
Lehmann, Christian. 1982. Thoughts on grammaticalization [Arbeitspapiere des Seminars für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Erfurt 9]. Erfurt, rev. edn. <[URL]>
. 2002. New reflections on grammaticalization and lexicalization. In New Reflections on Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 49], Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds), 1–18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. .
Lord, Carol, Yap, Foong Ha & Iwasaki, Shoichi. 2002. Grammaticalization of ‘give’: African and Asian perspectives. InNew Reflections on Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 49], Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds), 217–235. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. .
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. 1976. Kausativkonstruktionen [Studien zur deutschen Grammatik 4]. Tübingen: TBL.
Pennanen, Esko V. 1986. On the so-called curative verbs in Finnish. Finnisch-Ugrische Forschungen 47(2–3): 163–182.
Scholze, Lenka. 2007. Das grammatische System der obersorbischen Umgangssprache unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Sprachkontakts. PhD dissertation, University of Konstanz.
Spieß, Gunter. 2002. Niedersorbisch. In Wieser Enzyklopädie des europäischen Ostens, Bd. 10: Lexikon der Sprachen des europäischen Ostens, Miloš Okuka Gerald Krenn (eds), 323–342. Klagenfurt: Wieser Verlag.
Toops, Gary H. 1985. Grammatival Causativity in Slavic. PhD dissertation, Yale University.
. 1989. The syntax and semantics of Lithuanian curative constructions. In The Non-Slavic Languages of the USSR. Linguistic Studies, Howard I. Aronson (ed.), 249–282. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.
. 1992. Causativity in Czech: The verbs dá(va)t and nech(áv)at. Canadian Slavonic Papers 34(1–2): 39–56.
. 1993. Causative constructions in the Upper Sorbian literary language. Die Welt der Slaven 4: 102–136.
. 2012. Causative constructions in colloquial vs. literary Upper Sorbian. Die Welt der Slaven 57: 322–332.
Topolinska, Zuzanna. 1993. The verb dać/dawać in Polish periphrastic constructions. In Studies in Polish Morphology and Syntax, Gerd Hentschel & Roman Laskowski (eds), 229–249. Munich: Otto Sagner.
Vykypel, Bohumil & Rabus, Achim. 2011. From giving to existence: on one remarkable grammaticalization pathway. Linguistica Brunensia 59: 183–187.
von Waldenfels, Ruprecht. 2012. The Grammaticalization of ‘Give’ + Infinitive. A Comparative Study of Russian, Polish and Czech [Trends in Linguistics 256]. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Xrakovskij, Viktor S. & Volodin, Aleksandr P. 1986. Semantika i tipologija imperativa. Russkij imperativ. Leningrad: Nauka.
Žagar Szentesi, Orsolya. 2011. Funkcionalne varijante konstrukcije dati (se) + infinitiv u hrvatskom jeziku – u okviru gramatikalizacije. Suvremena Lingvistika 37(72): 295–318. <[URL]>
