Cover not available

In:Causation, Permission, and Transfer: Argument realisation in GET, TAKE, PUT, GIVE and LET verbs
Edited by Brian Nolan, Gudrun Rawoens and Elke Diedrichsen
[Studies in Language Companion Series 167] 2015
► pp. 1–11

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Introduction

Published online: 14 January 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.167.001int
References (23)
References
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. The syntax of causative constructions: Cross-language similarities and divergences. In Shibatani (ed.), 261–312.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diedrichsen, Elke. 2012. What you give is what you GET? On reanalysis, semantic extension, and functional motivation with the German bekommen-passive construction. In Lenz & Rawoens (eds), 1163–1205Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W. 2010. A typology of causatives: Form, syntax and meaning. In Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity, Robert M.W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds), 30–83. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gronemeyer, Claire. 1999. On deriving complex polysemy: The grammaticalization of get. English Language and Linguistics 3: 1–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kopecka, Anetta & Narasimhan, Bhuvana. 2012. Events of Putting and Taking: A Crosslinguistic Perspective [Typological Studies in Language 100]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lenz, Alexandra N. & Rawoens, Gudrun (eds). 2012. The Art of Getting: GET Verbs in European Languages from a Synchronic and Diachronic Point of View. Special issue of Linguistics 50(6).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Margetts, Anna & Austin, Peter K. 2007. Three participant events in the languages of the world: Towards a cross-linguistic typology. Linguistics 45: 393–451. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato. 2005. English Ditransitive Verbs. Aspects of Theory, Description and a Usage-based Model. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Newman, John. 1996. Give: A Cognitive Linguistic Study [Cognitive Linguistics Research 7]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(ed.). 1998. The Linguistics of Giving [Typological Studies in Language 36]. 
Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nolan, Brian. 2012a. The Structure of Modern Irish: A Functional Account. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012b. The GET constructions of Modern Irish and Irish English: GET-passive and GET-recipient variations. In Lenz & Rawoens (eds), 1111–1162.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Constructional polysemy and argument realisation with the Irish GET verb. In van Gelderen, Barðdal & Cennamo (eds), 87–116.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nolan, Brian & Diedrichsen, Elke. 2013. Linking Constructions into Functional Linguistics: The Role of Constructions in Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series 145]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi (ed.). 1976. The Grammar of Causative Constructions [Syntax and Semantics 6]. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(ed.). 2002. The Grammar of Causation and Interpersonal Manipulation [Typological Studies in Language 48]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Song, Jae Jung. 1996. Causatives and Causation: A Universal-typological Perspective [Longman Linguistics Library]. London: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. I: Concept Structuring Systems. [Language, Speech, and Communication Series]. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tragel, Ilona. 2001. On Estonian core verbs. In Papers in Estonian Cognitive Linguistics [Publications of the Department of General Linguistics 2], Ilona Tragel (ed.), 145–169. Tartu: Tartu University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tragel, Ilona & Habicht, Külli. 2012. Grammaticalization of the Estonian saama ‘get’. In Lenz & Rawoens (eds), 1371–1412.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly, Jóhanna Barðdal & Michela Cennamo. 2013. Argument Structure in Flux. The Naples-Capri Papers [Studies in Language Companion Series 131]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Valin, Jr., Robert D. 2005. Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (ed.). 2008. Investigations of the Syntax–Semantics–Pragmatics Interface [Studies in Language Companion Series 105]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue