In:On Diversity and Complexity of Languages Spoken in Europe and North and Central Asia
Edited by Pirkko Suihkonen and Lindsay J. Whaley
[Studies in Language Companion Series 164] 2014
► pp. 381–400
On the evolution of Russian subject reference
Internal factors
Published online: 17 December 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.164.13sid
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.164.13sid
Personal pronouns in Russian have replaced verbal inflection forms as the main reduced referential devices marking subject. Some possible internal scenarios of this process are examined, namely the present perfect reconstruction in Old Russian and the semantic similarity between Old Russian present nominal clauses and present verbal ones. Further testing of both hypotheses is based on the detailed chronological survey on 50 Old Russian texts (about 2000 relevant verbal clauses) from the 11th till the 17th century with the help of statistical methods (Student’s t-test and Lilliefors test). The diachronic study of Old Russian documents disproves the hypothesis of initial perfect tense destruction but admits the possibility of semantic factors as a trigger to the subject reference alternation.
References (25)
Borkovskij, Viktor I. & Kuznecov, Petr S. 2006 [1963]. Istoričeskaja grammatika russkogo jazyka (A Historical Grammar of Russian). Moscow: URSS.
Černyx, Pavel J. 1954. Istoričeskaja grammatika russkogo jazyka (A Historical Grammar of Russian). Moscow: Nauka.
Dahl, Östen. 1990. Standard Average European as an exotic language. In Toward a Typology of European Languages [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 8], Johannes Bechert, Giuliano Bernini & Claude Buridant (eds), 3–8. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dryer, Mattew. 2011. Expression of pronominal subjects. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Ch.101, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. [URL]
Eckhoff, Heine & Meyer, Roland. 2011. Conditions on null subjects in Old Church Slavonic, a contrastive view. Paper presented atthe 20th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Osaka, July 25.
Givón, Thomas. (ed.). 1983. Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-language Study [Typological Studies in Language 3]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gorškova, Klavdija V. & Xaburgaev, Georgij A. 1981. Istoričeskaja grammatika russkogo jazyka (A Historical Grammar of Russian). Moscow: Vysšaja škola.
Haspelmath, Martin. 2001. The European linguistic area: Standard Average European. In Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook 2, Martin Haspelmath (ed.), 1492–1510. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Jakobson, Roman O. 1971[1935]. Les enclitiques slaves. In Selected Writings II, Roman Jakobson, 16–22. The Hague: Mouton. (Original publication: Atti del Congresso di Linguistica tenuto in Roma il 19–26 Settembre 1933. Firenze, 1935).
Keenan, Edward. 1976. Towards a universal definition of ‘Subject’. In Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed.), 303–334. New York NY: Academic Press.
. 2013. Peculiarities and origins of the Russian referential system. In Languages Across Boundaries: Studies in Memory of Anna Siewierska, Dik Bakker & Martin Haspelmath (ed.) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Koivulehto, Jorma. 2002. Contact with non-Germanic languages II: Relations to the East. In The Nordic Languages: An International Handbook of the History of the North Germanic Languages, Oskar Bandle, Lennart Elmevik & Gun Widmark (eds), 583–594. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Kopotev, Mikhail V. 2011. Reconstruction and idiomacity: The origin of Russian verbless clauses reconsidered. Paper presented atthe 20th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Osaka. [URL]
Levšina, Natalia G. 2012. Results of statistical analysis of the data in Pavlova 2010. Ms,University of Jena.
Lindseth, Martina. 1998. Null-subject Properties of Slavic Languages: with Special Reference to Russian, Czech and Sorbian. München: Sagner.
Padučeva, Elena V. 1985. Vyskazyvanie i ego sootnesennost’ s dejstvitelnostiju: referenzial’nyje aspecty semantiki mestoimenij (The utterance and its relation to reality: referential aspects of pronoun semantics). Moscow: Nauka.
Pavlova, Elizaveta K. 2010. Vzaimosvjaz' meždu markirovaniem lica v glagole i v podležaščnom mestoimenii v russkom jazyke (Relationship between person marking on the verb and on subject pronoun in Russian). Year paper. Dept. of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, Moscow State University.
Stone, Gerald. 1993. Cassubian. In The Slavonic Languages, Bernard Comrie & Greville G. Corbett (eds), 759–794. London: Routledge.
. 1993b. Sorbian. In The Slavonic Languages, Bernard Comrie & Greville G. Corbett (eds), 593–685. London: Routledge.
Whorf, Benjamin Lee. 1956. Language, Thought and Reality. In Selected Writings of Benjamins Lee Whorf, John B. Carroll (eds)Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Xaburgaev, Georgij A. 1978. Sud’ba vspomogatel’nogo glagola drevnix slavjanskix analitičeskix form v russkom jazyke (The destiny of the auxiliary verbs in the Old Slavic analytic forms in Russian). Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Philologija 1978(4): 42–53.