In:On Diversity and Complexity of Languages Spoken in Europe and North and Central Asia
Edited by Pirkko Suihkonen and Lindsay J. Whaley
[Studies in Language Companion Series 164] 2014
► pp. 339–378
Evidentiality in Dzungar Tuvan
Published online: 17 December 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.164.12rin
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.164.12rin
Dzungar Tuvan is a Turkic language variety spoken in North-West China. This article describes the strategies of Dzungar Tuvan to express information source both in finite and infinite sentences. In finite sentences, the interplay between the suffixes -D, GAn, -(I)pdur and the copula irgin provide the means to distinguish direct-perceptive, inferential and reportive type of evidentiality. The functions of these elements are, however, text type dependent. Regarding infinite or a temporal interpretation, can be subordinated to an omitted sentences, the direct or indirect reading of perception verbs will be discussed, which depends on the aspecto-temporal marking of the complement predicate. Converbial -sA clauses, which allow a conditional perception clause to which the finite main clause constitutes a complement.
References (26)
Comrie Bernard 2000. Evidentials: semantics and history. In Evidentials. Turkic, Iranian and Neighbouring Languages, Lars Johanson & Bo Utas (eds), 1-12. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Chappell, Hillary 1992. Towards a typology of aspect in Sinitic languages. In Zhongguo Jingnei Yuyan ji Yuyanxue: Hanyu Fangyan (Chinese Languages and Linguistics: Chinese dialects) 1.1: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Chinese Languages and Linguistics, July 20–22 1990, 67–106. Taipei: Academia Sinica
Čeremisina, Maja Ivanovna, et al. 1986. Strukturnye tipy sintetičeskix polipredikatnyx konstrukcii v jazykax raznyx sistem. Novosibirsk: Nauka.
Golden, Peter B. 1992. An Introduction to the History of the Turkic Peoples. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Isxakov, Fazil Garifovič & Pal'mbax, Aleksandr Adol‘fovič 1961. Grammatika tuvinskogo jazyka. Fonetika i morfologija. Moskow: Izdatel’stvo vostočnoj literatury.
Johanson Lars 1994. Türkeitürkische Aspektotempora. In Tense Systems in the European Languages, 247–266. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
2000. Turkic indirectives. In Evidentials. Turkic, Iranian and Neighbouring Languages, Lars Johanson & Bo Utas (eds), 61-88. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Johanson, Lars 2003. Evidentiality in Turkic. In Studies in Evidentiality [Typological Studies in Language 54], Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M.W. Dixon (eds), 273-390. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Khiis, Gansux 2009. Ocobennosti tuvinskoj reči žitelej Cengela. Avtoreferat dissertacii na soiskanie učenoj ctepeni kandidata filologičeskix nauk. Novosibirsk.
Mawkanuli, Talant 1999. Phonology and Morphology of Jungar Tuva. PhD dissertation, Indiana University.
2001. The Jungar Tuvas: Language and national identity in the PRC. Central Asian Survey 20(4): 497–517.
Nevskaya, Irina Anatolevna 2005. Polipredikativnyx konstrukcii, obrazuemye formoj na -SA v šorskom jazyke. In Altajskie jazyki i vostočnaja filologija, Bičeldej, et al. (eds), 291-300. Moskow: Vostočnaja literatura, RAN.
Rind-Pawlowski, Monika 2014a. Nebensatzbildung im Dzungar-Tuvinischen. PhD dissertation, Freie Universität Berlin.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
ÜZÜM, Melike
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
