In:Grammaticalization – Theory and Data
Edited by Sylvie Hancil and Ekkehard König
[Studies in Language Companion Series 162] 2014
► pp. 257–286
“Final hanging but” in American English
Where a formal coordinator meets a functional subordinator
Published online: 24 September 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.162.13izu
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.162.13izu
Mulder and Thompson (2006, 2008) point out that the final hanging but ([X but]) developed from initial but (X [but Y]) through a sequence of formal reanalyses, and insightfully observe the functional and formal parallelism between the development of the hanging type of final but and the final particalization of the Japanese subordinator -kedo. The present article demonstrates that but (and and as well) can perform a terminal bracketing function and serve as functional subordinators in spoken American English, and that they behave like final particles when the sentences are truncated. Although they are not so final-particalized as Australian final but, their interpersonal functions in final position are edging them closer to the status of final particles in spoken American English.
References (55)
Abraham, Werner. 1991. The grammaticization of the German modal particles. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, vol. II, Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 331–380. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar & Couper-Kuhlen, E. 2002. On the development of final though
. In New Reflections on Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 49], Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds), 345-61. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Brinton, Laurel J. 1992. The historical present in Charlotte Bronte's novels: Some discourse functions. Style 26(2): 221-244.
Chin, J. 1987. Syuujoshi: Hanashite-to kikite-no ninshiki-no gyappu-o umeru-tameno bunsetsuji. Nihongogaku 6(10): 93-109.
Christofer, Michael. 1996. Koi-ni Ochite (Falling in Love) [Kadokawa Script Book Series]. Tokyo: Kadokawa.
Culicover, Peter W. & Jackendoff, Ray. 1997. Semantic subordination despite syntactic coordination. Linguistic Inquiry 28(2): 195-217.
Davison, Alice. 1979. Some mysteries of subordination. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 9(1): 105-128.
Du Bois, John W., Schuetze-Coburn, Stephan, Cumming, Susanna & Paolino, Danae. 1993. Outline of discourse transcription. In Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research, Jane A. Edwards & Martin D. Lampert (eds), 45-89. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Du Bois, John W., Chafe, Wallace L., Meyer, Charles & Thompson, Sandra A. 2000. Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part One. Philadelphia PA: Linguistic Data Consortium. [URL] santa-barbara-corpus>
Du Bois, John W., Chafe, Wallace L., Meyer, Charles, Thompson, Sandra A. & Martey, Nii. 2003. Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part Two. Philadelphia PA: Linguistic Data Consortium. [URL]
Du Bois, John W. & Englebretson, Robert. 2004. Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part Three. Philadelphia PA: Linguistic Data Consortium. [URL]
Du Bois, John W., & Englebretson, Robert. 2005. Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part Four. Philadelphia PA: Linguistic Data Consortium. [URL]
Evans, Nicolas. 2007. Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 366–431. Oxford: OUP.
Haselow, Alexander. 2011. Discourse marker and modal particle: The functions of utterance-final then in spoken English. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 3603–3623.
Haspelmath, Martin. 2007. Coordination. In Language Typology and Linguistic Description, II: Complex Constructions, 2nd edn, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 1-51. Cambridge: CUP.
Hooper, Joan B. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1973. On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 4(4): 465-197.
Izutsu, Katsunobu & Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita. 2012. Exaptation and adaptation: Two historical routes to final particles. A paper presented at the 45th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea, Stockholm University, August 2012.
. 2013. From discourse markers to modal particles: Where the position reveals about the continuum. In Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: Categorization and Description, Liesbeth Degand, Bert Cornillie & Paoala Pietrandrea (eds), 217-235. Leuven: University of Louvain.
Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita & Izutsu, Katsunobu. 2014a. Truncation and backshift: Two pathways to sentence-final coordinating conjunctions. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 15(1): 92-122.
. 2014b. ‘Leap’ or ‘continuum’?: Grammaticalization pathways from conjunctions to sentence-final particles. In Language and Creative Mind, Mike Borkent, Barbara Dancygier & Jennifer Hinnell (eds), 83-99. Stanford CA: CSLI.
Mann, William C. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1987. Rhetorical Structure Theory: A Theory of Text Organization, USC Information Sciences Institute, Technical Report ISI/RS-87-190.
Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1988. The structure of discourse and ‘subordination.’ In Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 18], John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 275-329. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Mittwoch, Anita. 1979. Final parentheticals with English questions – Their illocutionary function and grammar. Journal of Pragmatics 3: 401-412.
Mulder, Jean & Thompson, Sandra A. 2006. The Grammaticization of but as a final particle in English conversation. In Selected Papers From the 2005 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society, Keith Allan (ed.), 1–18. [URL]
. 2008. The grammaticization of but as a final particle in English conversation. In Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining: The Multifunctionality of Conjunctions [Typological Studies in Language 80], Ritva Laury (ed), 179–204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Mulder, Jean, Thompson, Sandra A. & Williams, Cara Penny. 2009. Final but in Australian English Conversation. In Comparative Studies in Australian and New Zealand English: Grammar and Beyond [Varieties of English around the World G39], Pam Peters, Peter Collins & Adam Smith (eds), 339–359. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Nakano, N. 1992. “Ne”-to “yo”-no hataraki-nitsuite. Bulletin of the Faculty of Education, Yamaguchi University 41(1): 1-18.
. 1995. Shuujoshi “sa”-to “na”-no hataraki-nitsuite. In Tsukishima Hiroshi Hakushi Koki Kinen Kokugogaku Ronsyuu, Tsukishima Hiroshi Hakushi Koki Kinenkai (ed.), 1063-1085. Tokyo: Kyukoshoin.
Noda, Naoshi, Masuoka, Takashi, Sakuma, Mayumi & Takubo, Yukinori. 2002. Fukubun-to Danwa. Tokyo: Iwanami.
Norrick, Neil R. 2009. Conjunctions in final position in everyday talk. In Language in Life, and a Life in Language: Jacob Mey – A Festschrift, Bruce Fraser & Ken Turner (eds), 319-328. Bingley: Emerald.
Ohori, Toshio. 1995. Remarks on suspended clauses: A contribution to Japanese phraseology. In Essays in Semantics and Pragmatics: In Honor of Charles J. Fillmore [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 32], Masayoshi Shibatani & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 201–218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2000a. Framing effects in Japanese non-final clauses: Toward an optimal grammar-pragmatics interface. BLS 23: 471–480.
. 2000b. Gengochishiki-toshite-no koobun: Fukubun-no ruikeiron-ni-mukete. In Ninchigengogaku-no Hatten, Shigeru Sakahara (ed.), 281-315. Tokyo: Hituzi.
Ozaki, Makoto & Saeki, Namie. 1991. Hachigatsu-no Kujira (The Whales of August): English-Japanese Screen Library 6. Tokyo: Nanundoo.
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
Reinhart, Tanya. 1984. Principles of gestalt perception in the temporal organization of narrative texts. Linguistics 22: 779-809.
Ross, Eric & Groom, Winston. 1996. Foresuto Ganpu: Ichigo Ichie (Forest Gump) [Kadokawa Script Book Series]. Tokyo: Kadokawa.
Suzuki, Hideo. 1976. Gendai nihongo-niokeru syuujoshi-no hataraki-to sono soogo shoosetsu-nitsuite. Kokugo-to Kokubungaku 53(11): 58-70.
Tannen, Deborah. 1990. You just don’t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. New York NY: HarperCollins.
Thompson, Sandra A. 1987. “Subordination” and narrative event structure. In Coherence and Grounding in Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 11], Russell S. Tomlin (ed.), 435-454. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Thompson, Sandra A. & Longacre, Robert E. 1985. Adverbial clauses. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, II: Complex Constructions, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 171-234. Cambridge: CUP.
Tomlin, Russell S. 1985. Foreground-background information and the syntax of subordination. Text 5(1-2): 85-122.
