In:Paradigm Change: In the Transeurasian languages and beyond
Edited by Martine Robbeets and Walter Bisang
[Studies in Language Companion Series 161] 2014
► pp. 129–140
Chapter 6. Perceived formal and functional equivalence
The Hungarian ik-conjugation
Published online: 8 October 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.161.12csa
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.161.12csa
Hungarian prefers indirect insertion of copied verbal stems. The few counterexamples of directly inserted verbal stems indicate a high degree of intimacy due to intensive contact or relatedness. András Róna-Tas and Árpád Berta’s work West Old Turkic published in 2011 gives a list of over thirty Turkic verb stems that were inserted directly into Hungarian during the historical period from the sixth to the tenth centuries when Hungarians lived in close contact with Turkic-speaking tribes. The paper discusses the role of perceived formal and functional equivalence in copying and discusses the question of how the evolvement and the irregular pattern of the Hungarian ik-conjugation can be seen in relation with credible copying processes between West Old Turkic and Ancient Hungarian.
References (15)
Abaffy, Erzsébet. 1991. Az igemód és igeidő-rendszer. In A magyar nyelv történeti nyelvtana, Loránd Benkő (ed.), 104–121. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Bartha, Katalin. 1991. Az igeképzés. In In A magyar nyelv történeti nyelvtana, Loránd Benkő (ed.), 60–103. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
Csató, Éva Á. 2012. On copied verbal stems. Turkic loanwords in Hungarian. Talk given at the Workshop dedicated to Professor András Róna-Tas on the occasion of his 80th birthday. The Szeged Committee of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, March 11–13, 2012.
Erdal, Marcel. 1991. Old Turkic Word Formation. A Functional Approach to the Lexicon 1–2 [Turcologica 7]. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
Johanson, Lars. 1993. Das Suffix -mIš als Lehnelement. In Sprach- und Kulturkontakte der türkischen Völker: Materialien der zweiten Deutschen Turkologen-Konferenz, Rauischolzhausen, 13–16. Juli 1990, Jens Peter Laut & Klaus Röhrborn (eds), 87–92. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
. 2000. Linguistic convergence in the Volga area. In Languages in Contact [Studies in Slavic and General Linguistics 28], Dicky Gilbers, John Nerbonne & Jos Schaeken (eds), 165–178. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Ralli, Angela. 2012. Morphology in language contact: verbal loanblend formation in Asia Minor Greek (Aivaliot). In Morphologies in Contact [Studia Typologica], Martine Vanhove, Thomas Stolz, Aina Urdze & Hitomi Otsuka (eds), 177–194. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Robbeets, Martine. 2012. Review of Róna-Tas, András & Berta, Árpád 2011. Turkic Languages 16: 265–293.
Róna-Tas, András. 2010. Morphological embedding of Turkic verbal bases in Hungarian. In Transeurasian Verbal Morphology in a Comparative Perspective: Genealogy, Contact, Chance [Turcologica 78], Lars Johanson & Martine Robbeets (eds), 33–42. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
