In:Paradigm Change: In the Transeurasian languages and beyond
Edited by Martine Robbeets and Walter Bisang
[Studies in Language Companion Series 161] 2014
► pp. 23–60
Chapter 2. On the strength of morphological paradigms
A historical account of radical pro-drop
Published online: 8 October 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.161.07bis
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.161.07bis
This paper will present a historical explanation of radical pro-drop based on the strength of morphological paradigms. It will start out from the observation that East and mainland Southeast Asian languages (EMSEA) with their reduced or absent morphology are radical pro-drop, while West African Niger-Congo languages with similarly reduced or absent morphology have obligatory subject and object arguments. The reason for this is that the ancestor languages of Niger-Congo had a morphological paradigm expressing the features of [person] and [number] on the verb, while the ancestor languages of EMSEA had not. It will be argued that the existence of morphological paradigms keeps the frequency of [person] and [number] features above the critical percentage of 20–30% for linguistic change (s-curve model, Wang & Cheng 1970) and thus blocks the change from non-pro-drop to radical pro-drop in the West African languages concerned by passing on the frequency of the former morphological features to syntax and obligatory pronouns. In EMSEA languages, there is no morphological paradigm that pushes the frequency of these features up to the percentage that would be necessary for a change to non-pro-drop.
References (66)
Ackema, Peter, Brandt, Patrick, Schoorlemmer, Maaike & Weerman, Fred. 2006. Arguments and Agreement. Oxford: OUP.
Adelaar, Alexander. 2005. The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar: A historical perspective. In The Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar, Alexander Adelaar & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann (eds), 1–42. Oxford: Routledge.
Ansaldo, Umberto & Lim, Lisa. 2004. Phonetic absence as syntactic prominence. Grammaticalization in isolating tonal languages. In Up and Down the Cline — The Nature of Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Languag 59], Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde & Harry Perridon (eds), 345–362. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Arcodia, Giorgio Francesco. 2013. Grammaticalization with coevolution of form and meaning in East Asia? Evidence from Sinitic. Language Sciences 40: 148–167.
Baerman, Matthew & Corbett, Greville G. 2010. Introduction: Defectiveness: Typology and diachrony. In Defective Paradigms. Missing Forms and What They Tell Us, Matthew Baerman, Greville G. Corbett & Dunstan Brown (eds), 1–18. Oxford: OUP.
Bailey, Charles-James N. 1973. Variation and Linguistic Theory. Washington DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Benjamin, Geoffrey. 1976. An outline of Temiar grammar. In Austroasiatic Studies I and II, Philip N. Jenner, Laurence C. Thompson & Stanley Starosta (eds), 129–188. Honolulu HI: University of Hawaii Press.
Bisang, Walter. 1992. Das Verb im Chinesischen, Hmong, Vietnamesischen, Thai und Khmer. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
. 1996. Areal typology and grammaticalization: Processes of grammaticalization based on nouns and verbs in East and mainland South East Asian languages. Studies in Language 20(3): 519–597.
. 2004. Grammaticalization without coevolution of form and meaning: The case of tense-aspect-modality in East and mainland Southeast Asia. In What Makes Grammaticalization? - A Look from its Fringes and its Components, Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds), 109–138. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. 2006. South East Asia as a linguistic area. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Vol. 11, Keith Brown (ed.), 587–595. Oxford: Elsevier.
. 2008. Grammaticalization and the areal factor: The perspective of East and mainland Southeast Asian languages. In Rethinking Grammaticalization. New Perspectives [Typological Studies in Language 76], López-Couso, María José & Elena Seoane (eds), 15–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2009. On the evolution of complexity — Sometimes less is more in East and mainland Southeast Asia. In Language Complexity as an Evolving Variable, Geoffrey Sampson, David Gil & Peter Trudgill (eds), 34–49. Oxford: OUP.
. 2011. Grammaticalization and typology. In Handbook of Grammaticalization, Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds), 105–117. Oxford: OUP.
. 2013. Language contact between geographic and mental space. In Linguistic Perspectives on Space: Geography, Interaction, and Cognition, Peter Auer, Martin Hilpert, Anja Stukenbrock & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi (eds), 61–100. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. Forthcoming. Khmer. In Handbook of Austroasiatic, Paul Sidwell & Mathias Jenny (eds). London: Routledge.
Bisang, Walter & Sonaiya, Remi. 1999. The function of the High Tone Syllable in Yoruba. The Journal of African Languages and Linguistics (JALL) 20: 1–19.
Bybee, Joan L. 1985. Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form [Typological Studies in Language 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Déchaine, Rose-Marie. 1993. Predicates across Categories: Towards A Category-neutral Syntax. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts.
Dede, Keith. 2007. The origin of the anti-ergative [xa] in Huangshui Chinese. Language and Lingusitics 8(4): 863–881.
Djamouri, Redouane. 2013. Object incorporation in Tangwang. Paper presented at the ‘1st International Symposium on Linguistic Typology’, Changshu, November 30 – December 01, 2013.
Donegan, Patricia & Stampe, David. 2004. Rhythm and the synthetic drift of Munda. In The Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 2004, Rajendra Singh (ed.), 3–36. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Edmondson, Jerold & Solnit, David. 1988. Introduction. In Comparative Kadai: Linguistic Studies beyondTai, Jerold Edmondson & David Solnit (eds), 1–26. Dallas TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas at Arlington.
Enfield, Nick J. 2003. Linguistic Epidemiology. Semantics and Grammar of Language Contact in Mainland Southeast Asia. London: Routledge Curzon.
Greenberg, Joseph. 1974. Numeral classifiers and substantival number: Problems in the genesis of a linguistic type. In Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of Linguistics, Bologna - Florence, Aug-Sept 1972, Bologna 1974, 17–37. Reprinted in: Greenberg (1990: 16–93).
Güldemann, Tom. 2007. Bantu in its macro-areal context of Africa and implications for the early typology of Bantu and Niger-Congo. Paper read at the International Conference on Bantu Languages, Gothenburg, Oct. 4–6.
. 2010. Proto-Bantu and Proto-Niger-Congo: Macro-areal typology and linguistic reconstruction. In Geographical Typology and Linguistic Areas. With Special Reference to Africa [Tokyo University of Foreign Studies 2], Osamu Hieda, Christa König & Hirosi Nakagawa (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Huang, C.-T. James. 1984. On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 531–574.
Hyman, Larry Michael. 1999. The historical interpretation of vowel harmony. In Bantu Historical Linguistics: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives, Jean-Marie Hombert & Larry Michael Hyman (eds), 235–295. Stanford CA: CSLI.
. 2010. The Macro-Sudan Belt and Niger-Congo Reconstruction. [URL] (4 September 2011).
Jaeggli, Osvaldo & Safir, Ken. 1989. The null subject parameter in language acquisition. In The Null Subject Parameter, Osvaldo Jaeggli & Ken Safir (eds), 215–238. Dordrecht: Foris.
Jenner, Philipp & Pou, Saveros. 1982. A Lexicon of Khmer Morphology. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Kiparsky, Paul. 1973. ‘Elsewhere’ in Phonology. In A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Stephen R. Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds), 93–106. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Li, Xuping & Bisang, Walter. 2012. Classifiers in Sinitic languages: From individuation to definiteness-marking. Lingua 122: 335–355.
Luo, Yongxian. 1997. The Subgroup Structure of the Tai Languages: A Historical-Comparative Study [Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series 12]. Berkeley CA: University of California.
Neeleman, Ad & Szendrői, Kriszta. 2007. Radical pro drop and the morphology of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 38: 671–714.
Nurse, Derek. 2007. Did Proto-Bantu have a syntactic or an analytic structure? School of Oriental and African Studies Working Papers in Linguistics15: 239–256.
Perlmutter, David. 1971. Deep and Surface Constraints in Generative Grammar. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Pinnow, Heinz-Jürgen. 1960. Über den Ursprung der voneinander abweichenden Strukturen der Munda- und Khmer-Nikobar Sprachen. Indo-Iranian Journal 4(1): 81–103.
Robbeets, Martine. 2012. Shared verb morphology in the Transeurasian languages: copy or cognate? In Copies versus Cognates in Bound Morphology, Lars Johanson & Martine Robbeets (eds), 427–446. Leiden: Brill.
Ross, Malcolm. 2002. The history and transitivity of western Austronesian voice and voice-marking. In The History and Typology of Western Austronesian Voice Systems, Fay Wouk & Malcolm Ross (eds), 17–62. Canberra: The Australian National University.
Sagart, Laurent 1999. The Roots of Old Chinese [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 184]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Seifart, Frank. 2011. Bora Loans in Resígaro: massive morphological and little lexical borrowing in a Moribund Arawakan language. Cadernos de Etnolingüística. Série Monografias 2.
Sidwell, Paul. 2008. Issues in the morphological reconstruction of Proto-Mon-Khmer. In Morphology and Language History. In Honour of Harold Koch [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 298], Claire Bowern, Bethwyn Evans & Luisa Miceli (eds), 251–265. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Speas, Margaret. 1994. Null arguments in a theory of economy of projections. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 17: 179–208.
Van de Velde, Mark L.O. 2009. Eton tonology and morphosyntax: A holistic typological approach. In New Challenges in Typology: Broadening the Horizons and Redefining the Foundations, Vol. 2, Pacience L. Epps & Alexandre Arkhipov (eds), 35–60. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Wang, Jian / 王健. 2013. 类型学视野下的汉语方言“量名”结构研究 (Bare classifier phrases in Sinitic languages: a typological perspective). Language Sciences 12(4): 383–393.
Cited by (30)
Cited by 30 other publications
Jarvis, Rebecca
Li, Fanxi
2021. On the conditional marker “zhě”(者). International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 8:2 ► pp. 204 ff.
Seržant, Ilja A.
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
Ansaldo, Umberto, Walter Bisang & Pui Yiu Szeto
Arkadiev, Peter & Timur Maisak
Coupe, Alexander R.
Dahl, Östen
Esseesy, Mohssen
Haig, Geoffrey
Haspelmath, Martin
Heine, Bernd
Johanson, Lars & Éva Á. Csató
Klamer, Marian
McWhorter, John H.
Mithun, Marianne
Moyse-Faurie, Claire
Mushin, Ilana
Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine
Narrog, Heiko, Seongha Rhee & John Whitman
Smith, Hiram L.
Zariquiey, Roberto
Bisang, Walter
Bisang, Walter
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
