In:Usage-based Approaches to Japanese Grammar: Towards the understanding of human language
Edited by Kaori Kabata and Tsuyoshi Ono
[Studies in Language Companion Series 156] 2014
► pp. 153–170
The semantic basis of grammatical development
Its implications for modularity, innateness, and the theory of grammar
Published online: 10 June 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.156.12shi
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.156.12shi
This chapter reviews semantic bias observed in the acquisition of grammatical categories, and examines its theoretical implications. It first reviews the acquisition of tense-aspect morphology, in particular of English, and proposes a model of grammatical development called the “input-based prototype formation”, taking examples from cross-linguistic data. I will then discuss semantic bias observed in the acquisition of pronominal case in English, conditionals in Japanese and Korean, causative morphology in Japanese, nominative case omission in Japanese and Korean, and relative clause construction in Japanese. Based on the review, I will argue against modularity and the innateness hypothesis, which constitutes the fundamental assumptions espoused by generative grammar, and argue for further analysis of semantic bias in frequency distribution in the input language that children are exposed to.
References (70)
Akatsuka, Noriko & Clancy, Patricia M. 1993. Conditionality and deontic modality in Japanese and Korean: Evidence from emergence of conditionals.
Japanese/ Korean Linguistics
, Vol. 2, Patricia M. Clancy (ed.), 177-192. Stanford CA: CSLI.
Aksu-Koç, Ayhan. 1988.
The Acquisition of Aspect and Modality: The Case of Past Reference in Turkish
. Cambridge: CUP.
Andersen, Roger W. 1990.
Seminar on the acquisition of tense and aspect
. Unpublished lecture, University of California at Los Angeles.
. 1993. Four operating principles and input distribution as explanations for underdeveloped and mature morphological systems. In
Progression and Regression in Language
, Kenneth Hyltenstam & Åke Viborg (eds), 309-339. Cambridge: CUP.
Andersen, Roger W. & Shirai, Yasuhiro. 1996. Primacy of aspect in first and second language acquisition: The pidgin/creole connection. In
Handbook of Second Language Acquisition
, William C. Ritchie & Tej K. Bhatia (eds). San Diego CA: Academic Press.
Antinucci, Francesco & Miller, Ruth. 1976. How children talk about what happened.
Journal of Child Language
3: 169-189.
Bates, Elizabeth & MacWhinney, Brian. 1989. Functionalism and the competition model. In
The Cross-linguistic Study of Sentence Processing
, Brian MacWhinney & Elizabeth Bates (eds). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Berman, Ruth. 1994. Developmental perspectives on transitivity: A confluence of cues. In
Other Children, Other Languages: Issues in Theory of Language Acquisition
, Yonata Levy (ed.). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
. 1999. Creole languages, the Language Bioprogram Hypothesis, and language acquisition. In
Handbook of Child Language Acquisition
, William C. Ritchie & Tej K. Bhatia (eds). San Diego CA: Academic Press.
Bolinger, Dwight & Sears, Donald A. 1981.
Aspects of Language
, 3rd edn. New York NY: Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich.
Bowerman, Melissa. 1985. What shapes children's grammars? In
The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Vol. 2: Theoretical Issues
, Dan Isaac Slobin (ed.). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Budwig, Nancy. 1986. Agentivity and Control in Early Child Language. PhD dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.
. 1989. The linguistic marking of agentivity and control in child language.
Journal of Child Language
16: 263-284.
. 1996. What influences children's patterning of forms and functions in early child language? In
Social Interaction, Social Cognition and Language: Essays in Honor of Susan Ervin-Tripp
, Dan Isaac Slobin, Julie Gerhardt, Amy Kyratzis & Jiansheng Guo (Eds). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bybee, Joan L. 1985.
Morphology
[Typological Studies in Language 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bybee, Joan L. & McClelland, James L. 2005. Alternatives to the combinatorial paradigm of linguistic theory based on domain general principles of human cognition.
The Linguistic Review
22: 381-410.
Cameron-Faulkner, Thea, Lieven, Elena & Tomasello, Michael. 2003. A construction based analysis of child directed speech.
Cognitive Science
27: 843-873.
Clahsen, Harald. 1986. Verb inflections in German child language: Acquisition of agreement markings and the functions they encode.
Linguistics
24: 79-121.
Clancy, Patricia. 1989. Form and function in the acquisition of Korean wh-questions.
Journal of Child Language
, 16, 323-347.
Crain, Stephen, & Thornton, Rosalind. 1998.
Investigations in Universal Grammar: A Guide to Experiments in the Acquisition of Syntax and Semantics
. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Crain, Stephen & Wexler, Kenneth. 1999. Methodology in the study of language acquisition: A modular approach. In
Handbook of Language Acquisition
, William C. Ritchie & Tej K. Bhatia (eds). New York NY: Academic Press.
Diessel, Holger & Tomasello, Michael. 2000. The development of relative clauses in spontaneous child speech.
Cognitive Linguistics
11: 131-151.
Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy & Golinkoff, Roberta Michnick. 1996.
The Origins of Grammar: Evidence from Early Language Comprehension
. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Hopper, Paul J. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse.
Language
56: 251-299.
Kuczaj, Stan A. 1976. -ing, -s, and -ed: A Study of the Acquisition of Certain Verb Inflections. PhD dissertation, University of Minnesota.
. 1978. Why do children fail to overgeneralize the progressive inflection?
Journal of Child Language
5: 167-171.
Langacker, Ronald. 2000. A dynamic usage-based model. In
Usage-Based Models of Language
, Michael Barlow & Suzanne Kemmer (eds), 1-63. Stanford CA: CSLI.
Lee, Hyeonjin & Wexler, Kenneth. 2001. Nominative case omission and unaccusatives in Korean acquisition. In Selected Papers from the Twelfth International Conference on Korean Linguistics, Hee-Don Ahn & Nam-Kil Kim (eds), 263-279. Seoul: Kyungjin Munhwasa.
Leone, P. 1990. Tense and aspect in Italian: A bias in the distribution of verbal inherent semantics and verbal morphology. Unpublished paper, Applied Linguistics, University of California, Los Angeles.
Li, Ping & Bowerman, Melissa. 1998. The acquisition of lexical and grammatical aspect in Chinese.
First Language
18: 311-350.
Li, Ping & Shirai, Yasuhiro. 2000.
The Acquisition of Lexical and Grammatical Aspect
. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Lieven, Elena V.M. 1994. Crosslinguistic and crosscultural aspects of language addressed to children. In
Input and Interaction in Language Acquisition
, Clare Gallaway & Brian J. Richards (eds). Cambridge: CUP.
Maratsos, Michael P. & Chalkley, Mary Anne. 1980. The internal language of children's syntax: The ontogenesis and representation of syntactic categories. In
Children's Language
, Vol. 2, Keith E. Nelson (ed.), 127-214. New York NY: Gardner Press
Mayes, Patricia & Ono, Tsuyoshi. 1993. The acquisition of the Japanese subject marker ga and its theoretical implications. In
Japanese/Korean Linguistics
, Vol. 2, Patricia M. Clancy (ed.), 239-247 Stanford CA: CSLI.
Miyamoto, Edson T., Wexler, Ken, Aikawa, Takako & Miyagawa, Shigeru. 1999. Case-dropping and unaccusatives in Japanese acquisition. In Proceedings of the 23rd annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Annabel Greenhill, Heather Littlefield & Cheryl Tano (eds), 443-452. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.
Morikawa, H. & Ono, S. 1997. Children's understanding of causatives in Japanese: A cross-sectional study. Paper presented at the SRCD Biennial Meeting, Washington DC, April 2.
Newmeyer, Frederick. 1983.
Grammatical Theory: Its Limits and Possibilities
. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Newport, Elissa, Gleitman, Henry & Gleitman, Lila. 1977. “Mother, I'd rather do it myself”: Some effects and non-effects of maternal speech style. In
Talking to children: Language Input and Acquisition
, Catherine E. Snow & Charles A. Ferguson (eds). Cambridge: CUP.
Ochs, Elinor. 1985. Variation and error: A sociolinguistic approach to language acquisition. In
The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Vol. 1: The Data
. Daniel Isaac Slobin (ed.). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ozeki, Hiromi & Shirai, Yasuhiro. 2010. Semantic bias in the acquisition of relative clauses in Japanese.
Journal of Child Language
37: 197-215.
Pawley, Andrew & Syder, Frances. 1983. Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Native-like selection and native-like fluency. In
Language and communication
, Jack C. Richards & Richard Schmidt (eds). London: Longman.
Rispoli, Matthew. 2002. Theory and methods in the study of the development of case and agreement: A response to Schutze.
Journal of Child Language
29: 151-159.
. 2005. When children reach beyond their grasp: Why some children make pronoun case errors and others don't.
Journal of Child Language
32: 93-116.
Rowland, Caroline F., Pine, Julian M., Lieven, Elena V.M. & Theakston, Anna L. 2003. Determinants of acquisition order in wh-questions: Re-evaluating the role of caregiver speech.
Journal of Child Language
30: 609-635.
Schütze, Carson T. 1999. Different rates of pronoun case error: Comments on Rispoli (1998).
Journal of Child Language
26: 749-755.
. 2001. Productive inventory and case/agreement contingencies: A methodological note on Rispoli (1999).
Journal of Child Language
28: 507-515.
Shirai, Yasuhiro. 1991. Primacy of Aspect in Language Acquisition: Simplified Input and Prototype. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
. 1993. Inherent aspect and the acquisition of tense/aspect morphology in Japanese. In
Argument Structure: Its Syntax and Acquisition
, Heizo Nakajima & Yukio Otsu (ed.).Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
. 1994. On the overgeneralization of progressive marking on stative verbs: Bioprogram or input?
First Language
14: 67-82.
Shirai, Yasuhiro & Andersen, Roger W. 1995. The acquisition of tense/aspect morphology: A prototype account.
Language
71: 743-62.
Shirai, Yasuhiro, Miyata, Susanne, Naka, Norio, & Sakazaki, Yoshiko. 2000. The acquisition of causative morphology: Why does it correlate with the imperative? In Proceedings of the Thirtieth Annual Child Language Research Forum, Eve V. Clark (ed.). Stanford CA: CSLI.
. 2001. The acquisition of causative morphology in Japanese: A prototype account. In
Issues in East Asian Language Acquisition
, Mineharu Nakayama (ed.), 183-203. Tokyo: Kurosio.
Slobin, Dan Isaac. 1985. Crosslinguistic evidence for the Language-Making Capacity. In
The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Vol. 2: Theoretical issues
, Dan Isaac Slobin (ed.). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
. 1997-a. Why are grammaticizable notions special? A reanalysis and a challenge to learning theory. In
Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development
, Melissa Bowerman Stephen Levinson (eds). Cambridge: CUP.
. 1997-b. The origins of grammaticizable notions: Beyond the individual mind. In
The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Vol. 5: Expanding the Contexts
, Dan Isaac Slobin (ed.). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Slobin, Dan Isaac & Aksu, Ayha A. 1980. Acquisition of Turkish. Ms. Cited in Bickerton 1981.
Stoll, Sabine. 1998. The role of Aktionsart in the acquisition of Russian aspect.
First Language
18: 351-377.
Theakston, Anna L., Lieven, Elena V.M., Pine, Julian M. & Rowland, Caroline F. 2004. Semantic generality, input frequency and the acquisition of syntax.
Journal of Child Language
31: 61-99.
Tomasello, Michael. 2003.
Constructing a Language: A Usage-based Theory of Language Acquisition
. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
