In:Usage-based Approaches to Japanese Grammar: Towards the understanding of human language
Edited by Kaori Kabata and Tsuyoshi Ono
[Studies in Language Companion Series 156] 2014
► pp. 85–108
Subjectivity, intersubjectivity and Japanese grammar
A functional approach
Published online: 10 June 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.156.08shi
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.156.08shi
This survey study intends to show the benefits of adopting the functional linguistic perspectives of emphasizing the non-referential and emotive/subjective aspects of language, which are largely neglected in mainstream formalist linguistics. Specifically, this paper will first point out the fact that both Japanese linguist Haga and French linguist Benveniste independently proposed very similar dichotomies, juttei vs. dentatsu (Haga 1954) and subjectivity vs. intersubjectivity (Benveniste 1971[1958]) for their analyses of the non-propositional parts of language. Subsequently, drawing upon published studies, this paper will point out the relevance of these two dichotomies to syntactic organization (predicate order in particular), soliloquy and dialogue (or mental and speech act) dyad, and diachronic change (namely, the unidirectionality in grammaticalization from subjectification > intersubjectification (Traugott 2003).
References (86)
Akatsuka, Noriko. 1978. Another look at no, koto, and to: Epistemology and complementizer choice in Japanese. In
Problems in Japanese Syntax and Semantics
, John Hinds & Irwin Howard (eds), 178-212. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
. 1979. Epistemology, Japanese syntax, and linguistic theory.
Papers in Japanese Linguistics
6: 7-28.
Ariel, Mira. 1998. Mapping so-called ‘pragmatic’ phenomena according to ‘linguistic-extralinguistic’ distinction. In
Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics, Vol. II: Case Studies
[Studies in Language Companion Series 42] Michael Darnell, Edith A. Moravcsik, Michael Noonan, Frederick J. Newmeyer & Kathleen Wheatley (eds), 11-38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Axelrod, Melissa. 1999. Lexis, grammar and grammatical change. In
Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics, Vol. II: Case Studies
[Studies in Language Companion Series 42] Michael Darnell, Edith A. Moravcsik, Michael Noonan, Frederick J. Newmeyer & Kathleen Wheatley (eds), 39-58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Benveniste, Emile. 1958 [Tr. 1971].
Problems in General Linguistics
, trans. by Mary Elizabeth Meek. Coral Gables FL: University of Miami Press
Bühler, Karl. 1934[Tr. 1990].
Theory of Language: The Representational Function of Language
, trans. by Donald Fraser Goodwin. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bybee, Joan L. & Pagliuca, William. 1985. Cross-linguistic comparison and the development of grammatical meaning. In
Historical Semantics: Historical Word-Formation
, Jacek Fisiak (ed.), 59-83. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bybee, Joan L., Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William. 1994.
The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World
. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Cain, Mark J. 2002.
Fodor: Language, Mind and Philosophy
[Key Contemporary Thinkers]. Oxford: Blackwell.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999.
Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective
[Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax]. Oxford: OUP.
Cook, Haruko Minegishi. 1989. The sentence-final particle ne as a tool for cooperation in Japanese conversation.
Japanese/Korean Linguistics
1: 29-44.
Duchan, Judith F., Bruder, Gail A. & Hewitt, Lynn E. 1995.
Deixis in Narrative: A Cognitive Science Approach
. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Evans, Vyvyan. 2004.
The Structure of Time: Language, Meaning and Temporal Cognition
[Human Cognitive Processing 12]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Finegan, Edward. 1995. Subjectivity and subjectivisation: An introduction. In
Subjectivity and Subjectivisation: Linguistic perspectives
, Stein Dieter & Susan Wright (eds), 1-15. Cambridge: CUP.
Foley, William & Van Valin Jr., Robert D. 1984.
Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar
. Cambridge: CUP.
Fujii, Seiko. 2000. Incipient decategorization of MONO and grammaticalization of speaker attitude in Japanese discourse. In
Pragmatic Markers and Propositional Attitude
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 79], Gisle Andersen & Thorstein Fretheim (eds), 85-118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Givόn, Talmy. 1982. Logic vs. pragmatics, with human language as the referee: Toward an empirically viable epistemology.
Journal of Pragmatics
6: 81-113.
Givόn, T. 1995.
Functionalism and Grammar
. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hayashi, Makoto. 2003.
Joint Utterance Construction in Japanese Conversation
[Studies in Discourse and Grammar 12]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hengeveld, Kees. 2005 [1989]. Layers and operators in functional grammar. In
Crucial Readings in Functional Grammar
, Matthew P. Anstey & J. Lachlan Mackenzie (eds), 1-40. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hopper, Paul J. 1997. Dispersed verbal predicates in vernacular written narrative. In
Directions in Functional Linguistics
[Studies in Language Companion Series 36], Akio Kamio (ed.), 1-18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Iwasaki, Shoichi. 1993.
Subjectivity in Grammar and Discourse: Theoretical Considerations and a Case Study of Japanese Spoken Discourse
[Studies in Discourse and Grammar 12]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kamio, Akio. 1997.
Territory of Information
. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kuno, Susumu. 1987.
Functional Syntax: Anaphora, Discourse, Empathy
. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Kuroda, Sige-Yuki. 1973. Where epistemology, style and grammar meet: A case study from Japanese. In
A Festschrift for Morris Halle
, Stephen R. Anderson & Paul Kiparsky, 377-391. New York NY: Rinehart and Winston.
Langacker, Ronald. 1991.
Foundations of Cognitive Grammar
, Vol. II. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
Laury, Ritva & Ono, Tsuyoshi. 2005. Data is data and model is model: You don’t discard the data that doesn’t fit your model!
Language
81(1): 218-225.
. 1982. Deixis and subjectivity: Loquor, ergo sum? In
Speech, Place, and Action
, Robert J. Jarvella & Wolfgang Klein (eds), 101-124. New York NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Maynard, Senko K. 1993.
Discourse Modality Subjectivity, Emotion and Voice in Japanese Language
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 24]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2002.
Linguistic Emotivity. Centrality of Place, the Topic-Comment Dynamic, and an Ideology of Pathos in Japanese Discourse
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 97], Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Moriyama, Takuro. 1997.
'Hitorigoto' o megutte. Nihongo Bumpoo: Taikei to Hoohoo
, Yoshiaki Kawabata & Yoshio Nitta (eds), 173-188. Tokyo: Hituzi Shobo.
Mushin, Ilana. 2001.
Evidentiality and Epistemological Stance Narrative Retelling
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 97]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 1979. Modaritii to meidai.
Eigo to Nihongo to – Hayashi Eiichi Kyooju Kanreki Kinen Ronbunshuu
, Hayashi Eiichi Kyooju Kanreki Kinen Ronbunshuu Kankoo Iinkai (eds), 223-250. Tokyo: Kuroshio Shuppan.
Narrog, Heiko. 2002. Imironteki kategorii toshite no modaritii.
Cognitive Linguistics II: Categorization
, Toshio Ohori (ed.), 217-251. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.
. 1992. Handan kara hatsuwa dentatsu e – Denbun enkyoku hyoogen o chuushin ni -.
Nihongo Kyoiku
77: 1-13.
Nuyts, Jan. 2001.
Epistemic Modality, Language, and Conceptualization
[Human Cognitive Processing 5]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Onodera, Noriko O. 2004.
Japanese Discourse Markers. Synchronic and Diachronic Discourse Markers
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 132]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Onoe, Keisuke. 2001[1990]. Bunpoo-ron – Chinjutsuron no tanjoo to shuuen.
Bunpoo to Imi
, 278-300. Tokyo: Kurohio Shuppan.
. 2001[1998]. Ichigo-bun no yoohoo: ‘Ima/koko’ o hanarenai bun no kentoo no tame ni.
Bunpoo to Imi
, 217-229. Tokyo: Kurohio Shuppan.
Prevignano, Carlo L. & Thibault, Paul J. 2003.
Discussing Conversation Analysis: The Work of Emanuel A. Schegloff
. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Prinz, Jessee J. 2006. Is the mind really modular? In
Contemporary Debates in Cognitive Science
, Robert J. Stainton (ed.), 22-36. Oxford: Blackwell.
Quinn, Charles J. 1994.
UCHI/SOTO: Tip of a semiotic iceberg? ‘Inside’ and ‘outside’ knowledge in the grammar of Japanese. In
Situated Meaning: Inside and Outside in Japanese Self, Society, and Language
, Jane Bachnik & Charles Quinn Jr. (eds), 247-294. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rijkoff, Jan. 2005. Layers, levels and contexts in Functional Discourse Grammar. In
The Noun Phrases in Functional Discourse Grammar
, Daniel García Velasco & Jan Rijkhoff (eds), 63-115. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Romaine, Suzanne & Lange, Deborah. 1991. The use of like as a marker of reported speech and thought: A case of grammaticalization in progress.
American Speech
66: 227-279.
Sakakura, Atsuyoshi. 1993.
Nihongo Hyoogen no Nagare
. [Iwanami Seminaa Bukkusu 45]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.
Selting, Margret & Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2001.
Studies in Interactional Linguistics
[Studies in Discourse and Grammar 10]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Serafim, Leon A. & Shinzato, Rumiko. 2000. Reconstructing the Proto-Japonic kakari musubi, *…ka…-(a)m-wo
.
Gengo Kenkyu
118: 81-118.
Shinzato, Rumiko. 2003. Experiencing self vs. observing self: The semantics of stative extensions in Japanese.
Language Sciences
25: 211-238.
. 2004. Some observations concerning mental and speech act verbs.
Journal of Pragmatics
36(5): 883-897.
. 2007. (Inter)subjectification, Japanese syntax and scope increase.
Journal of Historical Pragmatics
8(2): 171-206.
Shinzato, Rumiko & Serafim, Leon A. 2003.
Kakari musubi in comparative perspective: Old Japanese ka/ya and Okinawan -ga/-i.
Japanese/Korean Linguistics
11: 189-202.
. 2013.
Synchrony and Diachrony of Okinawan Kakari-musubi in Comparative Perspective with Premodern Japanese
. Leiden: Brill.
Strauss, Susan & Sohn, Sung-ock. 1998. Grammaticalization, aspect, and emotion: The case of Japanese -te shimau and Korean -ia/e pelita
.
Japanese/Korean Linguistics
8: 217-230.
Suzuki, Ryoko. 1998. From a lexical noun to an utterance-final pragmatic particles: Wake
. In
Studies in Japanese Grammaticalization
, Toshio Ohori (ed.), 67-92. Tokyo: Kuroshio Publishers.
Suzuki, Satoko (ed.). 2006.
Emotive Communication in Japanese
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 151]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Tagliamonte, Sali & Hudson, Rachel. 1999.
Be like
et al. beyond America: The quotative system in British and Canadian youth.
Journal of Sociolinguistics
3(2): 147-172.
Tanabe, Masao. 1953. Iwayuru atsurae no joshi ‘namu’ nit suite.
Kindaichi Hakase Koki Kinen Gengo Minzoku Ronsoo
. Tokyo: Sanseido.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2003. From subjectification to intersubjectification. In
Motives for Language Change
, Raymond Hickey (ed.), 124-139. Cambridge: CUP.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Dasher, Richard. 1987. On the historical relation between mental and speech act verbs in English and Japanese. In
Papers from the Seventh International Conference on Historical Linguistics
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 48], Anna Giacalone Ramat, Onofrio Carruba & Giuliano Bernini (eds), 561-573. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Tsuchii, Shoichi & Omori, Akira. 2000. Aizuchi o toosei-shita komyunikeeshon ni okeru joshi ne no hindo no henka.
Ninchi Kagaku
7(1): 107-111.
Watamaki, Toru. 1997. Lack of the particle-ne in conversation by a child with autism: A case study.
Hattatsu ShogaiKenkyu
19: 146-157.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Scivoletto, Giulio
2025. Rethinking intersubjectification through the evolution of discourse markers in Sicilian. In Semantic-Pragmatic Change from Intersubjective to Textual Meanings [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 353], ► pp. 244 ff.
Rost, Michael
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
