In:Usage-based Approaches to Japanese Grammar: Towards the understanding of human language
Edited by Kaori Kabata and Tsuyoshi Ono
[Studies in Language Companion Series 156] 2014
► pp. 55–84
Grammar of the internal expressive sentences in Japanese
Observations and explorations
Published online: 10 June 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.156.07iwa
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.156.07iwa
‘Internal expressive sentences’ such as a! itai ‘Oh, it hurts,’ or aa yokatta ‘Oh, I’m so happy!,’ reveal directly what the speaker perceives or senses internally, and contrast sharply with ‘descriptive sentences,’ such as taroo wa kuma o uchitometa ‘Taro shot the bear.’ This distinction has been noted in both Japanese and European languages but has not received much attention in linguistics in general. This paper explores this neglected type of sentence in terms of their morphosyntactic patterns (co-occurrence with outcry vocalization, such as a!, aa, waa, restricted predicate forms, the clipped adjective form, and inability to code an experiencer), semantic primitives labeled as Experience, Stimulus and Receptor, and extralinguistic factors based on neurological states of perception, emotion and feeling.
References (50)
Basbaum, Allan I. & Jessell, Thomas M. 2000. The perception of pain. In
Principles of Neural Science
(4th edition), Eric R. Kandel, James Schwartz & Thomas M. Jessell (eds), 472-491. New York NY: McGraw-Hill.
Bednarek, Monika. 2006. Bühler, Karl (1879-1963). In
Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics
, 2nd edn, Keith Brown (ed.), 145-147. Oxford: Elsevier.
Bybee, Joan L. & Hopper, Paul. 2001.
Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure
[Typological Studies in Language 45]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Campbell, Nick. 2004. Databases of expressive speech.
Journal of Chinese Language and Computing
14(4): 295-304.
. 2005. Getting to the heart of the matter: Speech as the expression of affect, rather than just text or language.
Language Resources and Evaluation
39(1): 109-118.
Chafe, Wallace L. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In
Subject and Topic
, Charles N. Li (ed.). New York NY: Academic Press.
. 1994.
Discourse, Consciousness, and Time – The Flow and Displacement of Consciousness Experience in Speaking and Writing
. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Daneš, František. 1994. Involvement with language and in language.
Journal of Pragmatics
22: 251-64.
Damasio, Antonio.
Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain
. New York NY: Harcourt.
Dodd, Jane & Castellucci, Vincent F. 1991. Smell and taste: The chemical senses (Ch. 34). In Kandel, Schwartz & Jessell> (eds), 512-529.
Dong, Quang Phuc. 1971. English sentences without overt grammatical subject. In
Studies out in Left Field: Defamatory Essays Presented to James D. McCawley on his 33rd or 34th Birthday
, Arnold M. Zwicky, Peter H. Salus, Robert I. Binick and Anthony L. Vanek (eds), 3-10. Edmonton: Linguistic Research Inc. Reprinted in 1992 by John Benjamins.
Ghez, Claude. 1991. The control of movement (Ch. 35). In Kandel, Schwartz & Jessell (eds), 533-547.
Haiman, John (ed.). 1985.
Iconicity in Syntax
[Typological Studies in Language 6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(ed.). 1994. Ritualization and the development of language. In
Perspectives of Grammaticalization
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 109], William Pagliuca (ed.), 3-28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Innis, Robert E. 1982.
Karl Bühler - Semiotic Foundations of Language Theory
. New York NY: Plenum Press.
Irvine, Judith. 1982. Language and affect: Some cross-cultural issues. In
Georgetown University Roundtable on Languages and Linguistics
, Heidi Byrnes (eds), 31-47. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
Iwasaki, Shoichi. 2006. The structure of internal state expressions in Japanese and Korean. In
Japanese/Korean Linguistics
, Timothy J. Vance & Kimberly A. Jones (eds), 331-342. Stanford CA: CSLI.
Jakobson, Roman. 1960. Linguistics and poetics. In
Style in Language
, Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.), 350-377. Cambridge: CUP.
Kandel, Eric, Schwartz, James A. & Jessell, Thomas M. (eds). 1991.
Principles of Neural Science
, 3rd edn. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Kay, Paul & Fillmore, Charles. 1999. Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalization: The what’s X doing Y? construction.
Language
75: 1-33
Kinsui, Satoshi. 2003.
Vaacharu nihongo: Yakuwarigo no nazo
(Virtual Japanese: A mystery of role specified language). Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.
Kuroda, Sige-Yuki. 1990. The categorical and the thetic judgment reconsidered. In
Mind, Meaning and Metaphysics. The Philosophy and Theory of Language of Anton Marty
, Kevin Mulligan (ed.). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
. 1982. Deixis and subjectivity: Loquor ergo sum? In
Speech, Place and Action: Studies in Deixis and Related Topics
, Robert J. Jarvella & Wolfgang Klein (eds), 101-24. New York NY: Wiley.
Masunaga, Kiyoko. 1988. Case deletion and discourse context. In Papers from the Second International Workshop on Japanese Syntax, William J. Poser (ed.), 145-156. Stanford CA: CSLI.
Matsushita, Daisaburo. 1978[1930].
Kaisen hyoojun nihon bunpoo (teisei saihan)
(Revised Standard Japanese Grammar (corrected and re-published)). Tokyo: Bensei-sha.
Maynard, Senko K. 2000.
Jooi no gengo-gaku: ‘Ba-kooshoo-ron’ to nihongo hyoogen no patosu
. Tokyo: Kuroshio shuppan.
. 2002.
Linguistic Emotivity. Centrality of Place, the Topic-comment Dynamic, and an Ideology of Pathos in Japanese Discourse
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 97]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2007.
Linguistic Creativity in Japanese discourse: Exploring the Multiplicity of Self, Perspectives, and Voice
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 159]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Mio, Isago. 2003[1948].
Kokugohoo bunshoo ron
(A theory of Japanese sentences). Tokyo: Hitsuji-shoboo.
Morishige, Satoshi. 1971.
Nihonbunpoo no shomondai
(Issues in Japanese grammar). Tokyo: Kasama shoin.
Nathan, Peter W. 2004. Human nervous system. In
Encyclopædia Britannica
. [URL] (11 August, 2004).
Sadock, Jerrold M. & Zwicky, Arnold M. Speech-act distinctions in syntax. In
Language Typology and Syntactic Description: Clause Structure
, Timothy Shopen (ed.). Cambridge: CUP.
. 1967.
Nihon-teki hyoogen no gengo kagaku
(Language science of Japanese expression). Tokyo: Koosei-sha Koosei-kaku.
Sato, Masahiko. 2004.
Noo-shinkei to koo doo
(The brain-nervous system and behavior). Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.
Sugiura, Katsumi. 2005. ‘Samu!’ ‘uma!’ nado ni mirareru bunpooka ni kansuru koosatsu: Koobun bunpoo no shiten.
The Japanese Cognitive Linguistics Association Conference Handbook
, 153-156.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Akita, Kimi
Laury, Ritva, Tsuyoshi Ono & Ryoko Suzuki
2019. Questioning the clause as a crosslinguistic unit in grammar and interaction. Studies in Language 43:2 ► pp. 364 ff.
Laury, Ritva, Tsuyoshi Ono & Ryoko Suzuki
2021. Questioning the clause as a crosslinguistic unit in grammar and interaction. In Usage-based and Typological Approaches to Linguistic Units [Benjamins Current Topics, 114], ► pp. 123 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
