In:The Evidential Basis of Linguistic Argumentation
Edited by András Kertész and Csilla Rákosi
[Studies in Language Companion Series 153] 2014
► pp. 271–308
Chapter 10. Data and the resolution of inconsistency in Optimality Theory
Published online: 23 April 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.153.10rak
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.153.10rak
This chapter provides a survey about the most frequent methods of inconsistency resolution in Optimality Theory. With the help of the p-model, inconsistencies in OT are divided into two main groups. The first group includes conflicts that are deemed to be fatal and are solved usually by the modification of the theory: namely, clashes between “linguistic data” (acceptability judgements) and applications of the model (results of the evaluation procedure). The second group consists of conflicts that are, in contrast, tolerable in the view of OT theorists: inconsistencies between constraints and the best output candidates. The author’s analyses result in the conclusion that there is no radical break between OT and “standard” Generative Grammars with respect to the treatment of inconsistencies.
References (5)
Archangeli, Diana. 1997. Optimality Theory: An introduction to linguistics in the 1990s. In
Optimality Theory. An Overview
, Diana Archangeli & D. Terence Langendoen (eds), 1–33. Oxford: Blackwell.
Kertész, András & Rákosi, Csilla. 2012.
Data, Evidence and Plausible Argumentation in Linguistics. A Plausible Argumentation Model
. Cambridge: CUP.
. 2013. Paraconsistency and plausible argumentation in generative grammar: A case study.
Journal of Logic, Language and Information
22(2): 195–230.
. This volume. The p-model of data and evidence in linguistics.
