In:Events, Arguments, and Aspects: Topics in the Semantics of Verbs
Edited by Klaus Robering
[Studies in Language Companion Series 152] 2014
► pp. 301–328
The ‘say, do’ verb in Nyulnyul, Warrwa, and other Nyulnyulan languages is monosemic
Published online: 28 March 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.152.08gre
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.152.08gre
A well-known feature of many Australian Aboriginal languages is that the same verb form can mean either ‘say’ or ‘do’ (Rumsey 1990; Dixon 2002: 121). The received story is that this represents a polysemic verb with two distinct though not unrelated meanings. Few linguists, however, have presented arguments for this position. An exception is Knight (2004), who presents a set of arguments couched within the theoretical and methodological framework of Natural Semantic Metalanguage (NSM) that the inflecting verb -MA in Bunuba (Bunuban, Kimberley) is polysemous. Many of these arguments apply to other Australian languages, including languages of the nearby Nyulnyulan family. In this paper I focus on the two Nyulnyulan languages that I have studied most intensively, Nyulnyul (Western Nyulnyulan) and Warrwa (Eastern Nyulnyulan), and discuss the range of meanings and uses of the inflecting verb -J(I) ~ -D(I). These include the senses ‘say’, ‘do’, ‘think’, among a number of more specific senses. I present arguments for a radically monosemic account (e.g., Ruhl 1989; McGregor 1997) of this verb in its lexical uses, arguing in the process that the type of evidence adduced by Knight (2004) does not in fact argue for polysemy. I argue, that is, that a single core meaning is associated with the inflecting verb -J(I) ~ -D(I), and the senses ‘say’ and ‘do’ represent contextual senses or interpretations engendered by the context of use. A consequence of my approach is that the semantic meaning of lexical verbs is more abstract than often thought; indeed, it is so abstract that it is impossible to distinguish between the semantics of lexical and grammatical items in terms of the degree of abstraction.
References (46)
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (2000):
Classifiers: A Typology of Noun Categorisation Devices
. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Alsina, Alex, Bresnan, Joan & Sells, Peter (eds.) (1997):
Complex predicates, volume 64 of CSLI Lecture Notes
. Stanford CAL: CLSI Publications.
Amberber, Mengistu, Baker, Brett & Harvey, Mark (eds.) (2010):
Complex Predicate Formation: Cross-linguistic Perspectives on Event Structure
. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
Bowern, Claire (2004a): “Bardi verb morphology in historical perspective.” Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge MA.
(2004b): “Diagnostic similarities and differences between Nyulnyulan and neighbouring languages.” In: Claire Bowern & Harold Koch (eds.)
Australian Languages: Classification and the Comparative Method
,Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 269–290.
Clark, Herbert H. & Gerrig, Richard J. (1990): “Quotations as demonstrations.”
Language
66: 764–805.
Craig, Colette (1986): “Introduction.” In: Colette Craig (ed.)
Noun Classes and Categorization
:
Proceedings of a Symposium on Categorization and Noun Classification
,
Eugene, Oregon, October 1983,John Benjamins, Typological Studies in Language. 1–10.
Dixon, Robert M.W. (2002):
Australian Languages: Their Nature and Development
. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
Ejai, Tudor (1986): “The killing of the ‘Bilikin’ brothers.” In: Luise Hercus & Peter Sutton (eds.)
This Is What Happened: Historical Narratives by Aborigines,
Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies. 140–149.
Goddard, Cliff (1998):
Semantic Analysis: A Practical Introduction
. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hopper, Paul & Thompson, Sandra (1980): “Transitivity in grammar and discourse.”
Language
56: 251–299.
Hosokawa, Komei (1991): “The Yawuru Language of West Kimberley: A Meaning-based Description.” Ph.D. thesis, Australian National University, Canberra.
Kemmer, Suzanne (1993):
The Middle Voice
. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Knight, Emily (2004): “Aspects of Bunuba Grammar and Semantics.” Master’s thesis, University of New England, Armidale.
Levinson, Stephen C. (2000):
Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature
. Cambridge MA and London: The MIT Press.
McGregor, William B. (1990):
A Functional Grammar of Gooniyandi
. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. (1999): “The medio-active construction in Nyulnyulan languages.”
Studies in Language
23: 531–567.
. (2000): “Reflexive and reciprocal constructions in Nyulnyulan languages.” In: Zygmunt Frajzyngier & Traci S. Curl (eds.)
Reciprocals: Form and Function
,Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 85–122.
. (2002a): “Ergative and accusative patterning in Warrwa.” In: Kristin Davidse & Béatrice Lamiroy (eds.)
The Nominative and Accusative and Their Counterparts
, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 285–317.
. (2006a): “Focal and optional ergative marking in Warrwa (Kimberley, Western Australia).”
Lingua
116: 393–423.
. (2006b): “The grammar of complex predicate constructions in Warrwa and other Nyulnyulan languages.” In:
Workshop on Complex Predicates, ALS 2006 Conference
, University of Queensland.
. (2007a): “A desiderative complement construction in Warrwa.” In: Jeff Siegel, John Lynch & Diana K. Eades (eds.)
Language Description, History and Development: Linguistic Indulgence in Memory of Terry Crowle
y
,Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 27–40.
. (2007b): “Ergative marking of intransitive subjects in Warrwa.”
Australian Journal of Linguistics
27: 201–229.
. (2007c): “On the interface of semantics and pragmatics.” In: Henrik Jørgensen & Peter Widell (eds.)
Det bedre argument: festschrift til Ole Togeby 7. marts 2007
, Århus: Forlaget Wessel and Huitfeldt. 361–380.
Munro, Pamela (1982): “On the transitivity of ‘say’ verbs.” In: Paul In Hopper & Sandra Thompson (eds.)
Studies in Transitivity
, New York: Academic Press. 301–318.
Riemer, Nick (2010): “Sense individuation and syntactic optionality.” In: Brett Baker, Ilana Mushin, Mark Harvey & Rod Gardner (eds.)
Indigenous Language and Social Identity: Papers in Honour of Michael Walsh
,Canberra: Pacific Linguistics. 387–407.
Ruhl, Charles (1989):
On Monosemy: A Study in Linguistic Semantics
. Albany NY: State University of New York Press.
. (1982):
An Intra-sentence Grammar of Ungarinjin, North-western Australia
. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
. (1994): “On the transitivity of ‘say’ constructions in Bunuba.”
Australian Journal of Linguistics
14: 137–153.
Stokes, Bronwyn (1982): “A Description of Nyigina: A Language of the West Kimberley, Western Australia.” Ph.D. thesis, Australian National University, Canberra.
Stokes, Bronwyn & McGregor, William B. (2003): “Classification and subclassification of the Nyulnyulan languages.” In Nicholas Evans (ed.):
The Non-Pama-Nyungan Languages of Northern Australia: Comparative Studies of the Continent’s Most Linguistically Complex Region
,Canberra: Pacific Linguistics. 29–74.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Spronck, Stef & Daniela Casartelli
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
