In:Events, Arguments, and Aspects: Topics in the Semantics of Verbs
Edited by Klaus Robering
[Studies in Language Companion Series 152] 2014
► pp. 189–226
Aspectual coercion and eventuality structure
Published online: 28 March 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.152.05dol
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.152.05dol
The focus of this paper is on the system of aspectual coercion connected
with durative adverbials (like for one day), time-span adverbials (like in ten minutes), and time-point adverbials (like at seven o’clock) as well as the progressive in English and its roots in the domain of eventualities. Aspectual coercions are regarded as operations which are executed in order to prevent a conflict between the aspects of a verbal expression and the aspectual requirements of the context. The meaning resulting from such an adjustment involves material which is not contributed by the constituents but originates from knowledge of eventualities. Thus, leading questions of the paper are what the overall structure of eventualities is and how this structure determines the aspectual meaning of expressions as well as the way in which it can be contextually shifted. Recurring to prior work in the field of research, several sorts of eventuality and general relations that exist between eventualities of different sorts are distinguished. On this basis, by examining a sample of data, the paper identifies a multitude of operations for systematically transforming the (e.g., iterative coercion, habitual coercion, inchoative coercion, additive coercion, and subtractive coercion). Finally, taking into account that the operations have basically the same formal structure and, therefore, give reason to generalization, a two-stage approach to aspectual coercion is presented. Its most notably features are that, first, the principle of semantic compositionality is entirely maintained in its validity and, second, adjusting by coercion is turned out to be ultimately a pragmatic phenomenon.
References (45)
Bott, Oliver (2010):
The Processing of Events
. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Brennan, Jonathan & Pylkkänen, Liina (2008): “Processing events: Behavioral and neuromagnetic correlates of aspectual coercion.”
Brain & Language
106: 132–143.
Davidson, Donald (1967): “The logical form of action sentences.” In: Nicholas Rescher (ed.)
The Logic of Decision and Action
, Pittsburgh PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. 81–95.
Dölling, Johannes (1995): “Ontological domains, semantic sorts and systematic ambiguity.”
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
43: 785–807.
(1997): “Semantic form and abductive fixation of parameters.” In: Rob van der Sandt, Reinhard Blutner & Manfred Bierwisch (eds.)
From Underspecification to Interpretation. Working Papers of the Institute for Logic and Linguistics
, Heidelberg: IBM Deutschland. 113–139.
(2003a): “Aspectual (re-)interpretation: Structural representation and processing.” In: Holden Härtl & Heike Tappe (eds.)
Mediating between Concepts and Gramma
, Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 303–322.
(2003b): “Flexibility in adverbial modification: Reinterpretation as contextual enrichment.” In: Ewald Lang, Claudia Maienborn & Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen (eds.)
Modifying Adjuncts
, Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 511–552.
(2005b): “Semantische Form und pragmatische Anreicherung: Situationsausdrücke in der Äußerungsinterpretation.”
Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft
24: 159–225.
Dölling, Johannes & Heyde-Zybatow, Tatjana (2007): “Verb meaning: How much semantics is in the lexicon?” In: Andreas Späth (ed.)
Interface and Interface Conditions
, Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 33–75.
Dowty, David (1979):
Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. The Semantics of verbs and Times in generative Semantics and in Montagues’s PTQ
. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Egg, Markus (1995): “The intergressive as a new category of verbal aktionsart.”
Journal of Semantics
12: 311–356.
Engelberg, Stefan (2004): “Lexical event structures for verb semantics.”
Journal of Language and Linguistics
3: 62–108.
Heyde-Zybatow, Tatjana (2008): “What kind of events do achievements describe?” In: Anita Steube (ed.)
The Discourse Potential of Undespecified Structures
, Berlin: de Gruyter. 109–144.
Hobbs, Jerry, Stickel, Appelt & Martin, Paul (1993): “Interpretation as abduction.”
Artificial Intelligence
63: 69–142.
Kamp, Hans & Reyle, Uwe (1993):
From Discourse to Logic. Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language
. Kluwer.
Kratzer, Angelika (1996): “Severing the external argument from its verb.” In: Johan Rooryck & Laurie Zaring (eds.)
Phrase Structure and the Lexicon
, Dordrecht: Kluwer. 109–137.
Krifka, Manfred (1992): “Thematic relations as links between nominal reference and temporal constitution.” In: Ivan A. Sag & Anna Szabolcsi (eds.)
Lexical Matters
, Stanford CA: CSLI Publications. 29–53.
(1998): “The origins of telicity.” In: Susan Rothstein (ed.)
Events and Grammar
, Dordrecht: Kluwer. 197–235.
Link, Godehard (1983): “The logical analysis of plurals and massterms: A lattice-theoretical approach.” In: Bäuerle, Christoph Schwarze & Arnim von Stechow (eds.)
Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language
,Berlin and New York: de Gruyter. 303–323.
Maienborn, Claudia (2005): “On the limits of the Davidsonian approach: The case of copula sentences.”
Theoretical Linguistics
31: 275–316.
(2010): “Event semantics.” In: Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds.)
Semantics. An international Handbook of Natural Language Meaning
, Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, volume 1. 802–830.
Moens, Marc & Steedman, Mark (1988): “Temporal ontology and temporal reference.”
Computational Linguistics
14: 15–28.
Mourelatos, Alexander P.D. (1978): “Events, processes, and states.”
Linguistics and Philosophy
2: 415–434.
Parsons, Terence (1990):
Events in the Semantics of English: A Study in Subatomic Semantics
. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Pickering, Martin J., McElree, Brian, Frisson, Steven, Chen, Lillian & Traxler, Matthew J. (2006): “Underspecification and aspectual coercion.”
Discourse Processes
42: 131–155.
Piñango, Maria, Winnick, Rashad, Ullah, Aaron & Zurif, Edgar (2006): “Time-course of semantic composition: The case of aspectual coercion.”
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research
35: 233–244.
(1997): “Achievements in an event semantics.” In: Aaron Lawson & Eun Cho (eds.)
Proceedings of SALT VII
. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications, Cornell University, 273–296.
(2008): “Verbs of creation.” In: Johannes Dölling, Tatjana Heyde-Zybatow & Martin Schäfer (eds.)
Event Structures in Linguistic Form and Interpretation
, Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 493–521.
Pulman, Stephen (1997): “Aspectual shift as type coercion.”
Transactions of the Philological Society
95: 279–317.
Pylkkänen, Liina (2008): “Mismatching meanings in brain and behavior.”
Language and Linguistics Compass
2: 712–738.
Pylkkänen, Liina & McElree, Brian (2006): “The syntax-semantics interface: On-line composition of sentence meaning.” In: Matthew Traxler & Morton A. Gernsbacher (eds.)
Handbook of Psycholinguistics
, New York: Elsevier. 537–577.
Rothstein, Susan (2004):
Structuring Events: A Study in the Semantics of Lexical Aspect
. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
(2008): “Two puzzles for a theory of lexical aspect: Semelfactives and degree achievements.” In: Johannes Dölling, Tatjana Heyde-Zybatow & Martin Schäfer (eds.)
Event Structures in Linguistic Form and Interpretation
, Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 175–197.
Cited by (13)
Cited by 13 other publications
Piñango, Maria M., Yao‐Ying Lai, Ashwini Deo, Emily Foster‐Hanson, Cheryl Lacadie & Todd Constable
Klimek-Jankowska, Dorota, Krzysztof Hwaszcz & Justyna Wieczorek
Saussure, Louis de
2021. Pragmatic resolutions of temporal and aspectual mismatches. Pragmatics & Cognition 28:2 ► pp. 228 ff.
Dölling, Johannes
HOGEWEG, LOTTE & AGUSTIN VICENTE
Spalek, Alexandra Anna & Kjell Johan Sæbø
Sprugnoli, Rachele & Sara Tonelli
Yano, Masataka
Lukassek, Julia, Anna Prysłopska, Robin Hörnig & Claudia Maienborn
Baggio, Giosuè, Giulia Granello, Lorenzo Verriello & Roberto Eleopra
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
